Case 3275698

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL

Brighton and Hove City Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
7 January 2022
Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Inspector
Thomas G
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Nick Swirling
Agent
NJA Town Planning Limited
LPA reference
BH2021/00132
ONS LPA code
E06000043
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
23 September 2021

Summary AI

The appeal for a one-bedroom dwelling in the Sackville Gardens Conservation Area was dismissed due to concerns over the impact on the character and appearance of the area, as well as the living conditions of both existing and future occupiers.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL — Brighton and Hove City Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 14 December 2021 by Gareth W Thomas BSc(Hons) MSc(Dist) DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 07 JANUARY 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/Q1445/W/21/3275698 Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge, 60-64 New Church Road, Hove BN3 4FL • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Nick Swirling against the decision of Brighton & Hove City Council. • The application Ref BH2021/00132, dated 14 January 2021, was refused by notice dated 11 March 2021. • The development proposed is Demolition of existing garages and erection of 1no one- bedroom dwelling (C3) Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issues 2. The main issues in this appeal are: • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sackville Gardens Conservation Area; • the effects on the living conditions of neighbouring properties in terms of overlooking; and • the effects on the living conditions of future occupiers in terms of amenity. Reasons Character and appearance 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL — Brighton and Hove City Council — Appeal Decision There is some variety in the style and design of properties along the southern side of New Church Road but generally they are of substantial proportions incorporating robust gable features and full height projecting bays, which provide a clear sense of balance and symmetry to the street scene. These features as well as the spaciousness of plot arrangements add considerably to the significance of the designated Sackville Gardens Conservation Area (SGCA). 4. The introduction of a narrow single storey dwelling squeezed within the remaining space between the neighbouring properties of 64 New Church Road and Windsor House would unbalance the appearance of these properties and remove the sense of symmetry and spaciousness. It would appear as a development that has been shoehorned into the majority of the available space https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL — Brighton and Hove City Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Q1445/W/21/3275698 that exists between the neighbouring houses of elegant architectural quality. As such, it would fail to reflect the prevailing character that exists within the SGCA. 5. I appreciate that a few examples of infill development have occurred elsewhere along New Church Road. However, these fall outside the designated conservation area and I am not aware of the particular circumstances in those cases. However, in any event I must consider the appeal scheme on its own merits. 6. The existence of other schemes even of a similar nature in the locality does not justify the harm that I have identified, and on this basis, the proposed development would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the SGCA. The proposed development would also conflict with Policies HE6 of the Brighton and Hove Local Plan; CP12, CP14 and CP15 of the Brighton and Hove City Plan Part One. Collectively, these policies seek to ensure that new developments reflect the scale and character of the area through the creation of a coherent townscape. Living conditions – existing occupiers 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL — Brighton and Hove City Council — Appeal Decision Abutting the rear gardens of adjoining properties, the Council’s concerns relate both to the impacts from potential overlooking from the high-level lounge windows and from the single bedroom window at first floor. I agree with the appellant that ordinarily, high level windows do not have the same impact as full height windows in terms of overlooking and that bedroom windows are expected features within suburban settings. However, in this particular instance, the intimate relationship that would be created by a dwelling having no private rear garden area means that the perception of overlooking from both sets of windows coupled by the direct overlooking of existing rear garden areas from the proposed first floor window would detract unacceptably from the living conditions of neighbours with respect to privacy. 8. As such, the proposed development would be contrary to Policy QD27 of the Brighton and Hove Local Plan which sets out amongst other things to protect the amenity of adjacent occupiers caused by changes in overlooking and privacy. Living conditions – future occupiers 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL — Brighton and Hove City Council — Appeal Decision The proposed development would marginally fail to meet the Nationally Described Space Standards with respect to internal floorspace serving a two- storey dwelling although would exceed the standards for a one bedroom, two- person dwelling. Although the Council points to the limited internal height and space available to the double bedroom, I would agree with the appellant that overall, the appeal scheme would provide reasonable standards of accommodation. 10. That said, the sides and rear of the proposed dwelling would be built very close to the site boundary with little opportunity to provide any realistic private amenity space. A front garden area in full view of passers-by would fail to provide an acceptable level of privacy whilst outlook would be similarly compromised. The appellant’s reference to flatted developments having little private outdoor space is noted; however, modern flat developments would normally have shared private amenity space of useable quality and utility. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL — Brighton and Hove City Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Q1445/W/21/3275698 11. To conclude on this matter, the proposed development would constitute an overdevelopment of the site which would result in future occupiers not experiencing acceptable living standards in terms of amenity, outdoor space provision and outlook. This would be contrary to Policy QS27, which requires inter alia that future occupiers are provided with adequate levels of amenity. Conclusion 12. For the above reasons I conclude that the appeal is dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Gareth W Thomas

Garages adjacent to Cowdray Lodge , 60-64 New Church Road, HOVE, BN3 4FL — Brighton and Hove City Council — Gareth W Thomas INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶3

The introduction of a narrow single-storey dwelling would unbalance the appearance of the properties and remove the sense of symmetry and spaciousness.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶4

The proposed development would fail to reflect the prevailing character of the Sackville Gardens Conservation Area.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶7

The proposed development would create an intimate relationship between the dwelling and neighbouring properties, detracting from the living conditions of neighbours with respect to privacy.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶11

The proposed development would result in future occupiers not experiencing acceptable living standards in terms of amenity, outdoor space provision, and outlook.

Living conditions
Neutral
¶9

The proposed development would marginally fail to meet the Nationally Described Space Standards, but would provide reasonable standards of accommodation overall.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
HE6
Determinative
CP12
Substantial
CP14
Substantial
CP15
Substantial
QD27
Determinative
QS27
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 7 January 2022 under the Open Government Licence.