Case 3325318

Land to the rear of The Jolly Miller, Brigg Road , Wrawby, DN20 8RH

North Lincolnshire Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
14 May 2024
Authority
North Lincolnshire Council
Inspector
Radcliffe I
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Lincs Design Consultancy
LPA reference
PA/2022/535
ONS LPA code
E06000013
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
2 November 2023

Summary AI

Costs application refused as unreasonable behaviour and unnecessary expense not demonstrated. Decision based on planning judgement and sufficient evidence presented by the Council.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land to the rear of The Jolly Miller, Brigg Road , Wrawby, DN20 8RH — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 4 March 2024 by I Radcliffe BSc(Hons) MRTPI MCIEH DMS an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 14 May 2024 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/Y2003/W/23/3325318 Land to the rear of The Jolly Miller, Brigg Road, Wrawby DN20 8RL • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by J Godfrey-East for a full award of costs against North Lincolnshire Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the erection of 4 dwellings. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process1. 3. There are two claims to assess. Firstly, whether the Council failed to produce adequate evidence to substantiate its reason for refusal by making vague, generalised or inaccurate assertions about the proposal’s impact, which were unsupported by any objective analysis.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land to the rear of The Jolly Miller, Brigg Road , Wrawby, DN20 8RH — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision Secondly, whether the Council prevented development which should clearly have been permitted, having regard to its accordance with the development plan, national policy and any other material considerations. 4. In relation to both claims, the officer recommendation regarding the application was to grant permission. However, planning authorities are entitled not to accept an officer recommendation, so long as reasonable planning grounds are given for taking a different decision. 5. The Council’s reason for refusal explained that the harm that would be caused by virtue of the loss of countryside to development could not be overcome by good design at reserved matters stage. As a result, it explained that the proposal would be contrary to policies of the development plan and a paragraph of the National Planning Policy Framework (‘the Framework’)which seeks high quality design and the protection of the character and appearance of an area. At the time that the application was determined the Council had less than a 5 year housing land supply which meant that the so called ‘tilted balance’ in paragraph 11d) ii. of the Framework applied.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land to the rear of The Jolly Miller, Brigg Road , Wrawby, DN20 8RH — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision Even though the reason for refusal did not refer to this balance, it is evident from the emphatic language used that in the Council’s view the scheme would have failed to pass this test. 1 Paragraph: 028 Reference ID: 16-028-20140306, ‘Appeals’, ‘Why do we have an award of costs?’ https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land to the rear of The Jolly Miller, Brigg Road , Wrawby, DN20 8RH — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision Even though the reason for refusal did not refer to this balance, it is evident from the emphatic language used that in the Council’s view the scheme would have failed to pass this test. 1 Paragraph: 028 Reference ID: 16-028-20140306, ‘Appeals’, ‘Why do we have an award of costs?’ https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/Y2003/W/23/3325318 6. Although for the reasons given in the appeal decision I did not agree with the Council, such matters are a question of planning judgement. Through the wording of its reason for refusal included in the minutes of the Planning Committee meeting on 7 June 2023, and the decision notice that was subsequently issued, the Council presented evidence that was sufficiently respectable to substantiate its decision to refuse permission. As a result, it did not act unreasonably. 7. Taking all these matters into account, I therefore conclude that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in PPG, has not been demonstrated. An award of costs is therefore not justified.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Ian Radcliffe

Land to the rear of The Jolly Miller, Brigg Road , Wrawby, DN20 8RH — North Lincolnshire Council — Ian Radcliffe Inspector https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶5

The Council's reason for refusal was that the proposal would cause harm to the countryside, which could not be overcome by good design at reserved matters stage.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶5

The Council's reason for refusal also mentioned the protection of the character and appearance of an area, citing paragraph of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Housing land supply
Against appellant
¶5

The Council's reason for refusal also mentioned the 'tilted balance' in paragraph 11d) ii. of the Framework, which the scheme would have failed to pass.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 208
Substantial
Local Plan D1
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 14 May 2024 under the Open Government Licence.