Case 3324262

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT

East Hertfordshire District Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
11 March 2024
Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Inspector
Woodwards O
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mrs Jane Crossley
LPA reference
3/23/0108/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000242
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
4 October 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed as the proposal would not harm the special architectural or historic significance of the listed building or its setting. The inspector found that the proposal would not affect the primary setting of the property to the front courtyard and that the proposed house would be one storey and set reasonably distant from the listed house. The detailed design and materials could be controlled by condition.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 23 January 2024 by O S Woodwards BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11 March 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/J1915/W/23/3324262 Old East End House, East End, Furneux Pelham, Hertfordshire, SG9 0JT • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mrs Jane Crossley against the decision of East Hertfordshire District Council. • The application Ref 3/23/0108/FUL, dated 20 January 2022, was refused by notice dated 13 April 2023. • The development proposed is the erection of a detached Eco-House. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for the erection of a detached eco-house at Old East End House, East End, Furneux Pelham, Hertfordshire SG9 0JT, in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 3/23/0108/FL, dated 20 January 2022, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule. Preliminary Matter 2. The appellant submitted a revised elevation drawing with the appeal. However, this only updated the presentation of the proposed works and did not change the nature of the works themselves.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision I have therefore accepted the drawing and did not need to consult the Council on the changes. Main Issue 3. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the special architectural or historic interest of the grade II listed building1, with regard to its setting. Reasons Significance 4. Old East End House is a grade II listed building. It is a timber framed cottage. It has been significantly extended and altered, including a side extension built in different phases that is substantially larger than the original cottage building. The character of the cottage remains most legible from the front and the entrance drive. 5. The cottage was originally a building of modest scale associated with a small subsistence small holding. This was likely the combined Plots 179, 180 and 1 List entry number 1101887 and called ‘Lower Farm Cottage’ in the listing https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/J1915/W/23/3324262 1812. Historic mapping shows that only a small part of the current garden was originally a garden area associated with the house, being the area directly adjacent to the house and road, ie Plot 180. As it stands now, the house has a large garden including outbuildings and a swimming pool, all of which is clearly domesticated, and which includes Plot 179. This loss of the former relationship to agricultural land, combined with the substantial extensions, has eroded the significance of the building in its setting in historic and aesthetic terms. 6. The house was also historically associated with a barn building on the other side of a small courtyard to its west. However, it is now a separate dwelling, with separate access and a separate garden area in the former Plot 181, separated from the appeal property by a substantial and tall hedgerow boundary. Therefore, the former relationship to this building has been severed. 7. The primary significance of the listed building is therefore its intrinsic retained historic fabric within the original part of the cottage. This is best appreciated in its setting to the front as viewed from the courtyard.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision This aspect of setting therefore provides the greatest contribution to heritage significance. Looking at the significance of setting to the side and rear of the building, despite the visible alternations to the listed building, and the changes to land use and internal boundaries, there is still a sense of a farm cottage surrounded by open space and by adjacent farm style buildings, and because the original outer boundaries to the small holding remain. This aspect of the setting to the building contributes moderately, at most, to heritage value and significance. Proposal 8. It is proposed to erect a one storey house with associated vehicular access from the road, using an existing access point. It would sub-divide the plot to create a house with a separate large garden area which would include the existing large shed and swimming pool. Although no details have yet been provided, there would need to be a new internal boundary to separate the garden of the proposed house from the retained garden to the listed property. The outer boundary would remain as existing. Assessment 9. The proposed house, access works and associated landscaping would be most apparent when viewed from the large rear garden area.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision The substantial extensions also sit between the original cottage and the proposed building, reducing intervisibility to the areas of greater historic interest. The proposed works would therefore be seen in the context of the contemporary extension and would not affect the primary setting of the property to the front courtyard. In addition, the proposed house would be one storey and would be set reasonably distant from the listed house. The detailed design and materials could be controlled by condition. The proposed access area is to the far side of the proposed house and would not have any meaningful impact on the appreciation of the listed building or its setting. 10. The existing large garden to the listed building would be divided. However, because both areas would remain as gardens, the green and largely open character of the area would remain substantially the same. The detail of the 2 See Figure 4 of the Heritage Statement, dated January 2023 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/J1915/W/23/3324262 landscaping could be controlled by condition, including the boundary between the gardens, to ensure it would be appropriate for the setting of the building. Conclusion 11. The proposal would not therefore harm the special architectural or historic significance of the listed building or its setting. It therefore complies with Policies HA1 and HA7 of the East Herts Local District Plan 2018, which require proposals to preserve the historic environment and to sustain the significance of listed buildings. It also complies with Paragraph 203 of the Framework, which highlights the desirability of sustaining the significance of heritage assets, and s66 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended). Other Matter 12. One letter of objection has been submitted. In addition to matters covered above, the objector is concerned regarding the precedent that granting permission might set. However, planning applications and appeals must be considered on their own merits. Concern is also raised regarding the effect of the proposal on nature.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision No concerns have been raised by the Council regarding the effect of the proposal on biodiversity and the provision of appropriate measures to enhance habitat and biodiversity on the site could be secured by condition. Conditions 13. In addition to the standard time limit condition, a condition specifying the relevant drawings provides certainty. 14. The Council suggested a number of conditions which I have considered and amended in the light of government guidance on the use of conditions in planning permissions. 15. In particular, I have amended the condition in relation to noise from the proposed air source heat pump so that it requires the same standards as those set out in Class G of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (the GPDO 2015). The requirements originally set out by the Council went beyond this requirement, which was unreasonable in light of the GPDO 2015 and because the nearest sensitive receptors are relatively distant from the proposed heat pump. 16.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision I have also removed the requirement to provide evidence that the water use of the property would meet the Building Regulations 2010 (the Building Regs), because this would duplicate the Building Regs and is therefore unnecessary. Similarly, I have not imposed the electric vehicle charging point condition because this is a requirement of S1, Part 1, Schedule 1 of the Building Regs and is therefore also unnecessary. 17. Conditions relating to landscaping, external materials and boundary features are necessary to protect the character and appearance of the area, and the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building with regard to its setting. 18. The water consumption condition is necessary in achieving a satisfactory efficiency of water consumption in compliance with Policy WAT4 of the LP. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/J1915/W/23/3324262 19. The habitat boxes condition is necessary to protect and enhance biodiversity and to comply with Policy NE3 of the LP. 20. The air source heat pump condition is necessary to protect the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposed dwelling, and the existing occupiers of neighbouring dwellings, both with regard to noise pollution. 21. The landscaping condition is necessarily worded as a pre-commencement condition, as a later trigger for its submission would limit its effectiveness. Conclusion 22. The principle of a dwellinghouse in this location is acceptable in land use planning terms. I have found no material harm arises from the proposal. The proposal complies with the Development Plan when read as a whole and there are no material considerations that indicate I should make a decision otherwise. Therefore, the appeal is allowed.

Page 4 · Chunk 9 O S Woodwards

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — O S Woodwards INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Page 4 · Chunk 10 O S Woodwards

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — O S Woodwards INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4 Appeal Decision APP/J1915/W/23/3324262 ANNEX: CONDITIONS SCHEDULE 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision. 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 21-98-01A and 02. Pre-commencement 3) Prior to commencement of development, details of landscaping shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. The details shall include: full details of soft and hard landscape proposals, retained landscape features, planting plans, schedules of plants, species, planting sizes, density of planting and implementation timetable. Thereafter the development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details. Pre-specific part of development 4) Prior to commencement of above ground works, the external materials of construction for the development shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

Page 5 · Chunk 11 O S Woodwards

Old East End House East End, Furneux Pelham, BUNTINGFORD, SG9 0JT — East Hertfordshire District Council — O S Woodwards 5) Prior to the commencement of above ground works, details of habitat boxes/structures to be installed shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be installed prior to the first occupation of the dwelling and maintained throughout the lifetime of the development. Pre-occupation 6) Prior to the first occupation of the development, details of all boundary walls, fences or other means of enclosure to be erected shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the development should be implemented in accordance with the approved details. For observation 7) The air source heat pump must be installed so as to comply with the Microgeneration Certification Scheme standards, or equivalent standards, and be maintained as such for the lifetime of the development. 8) The dwelling hereby approved shall be fitted out so that the potential consumption of wholesome water by persons occupying the dwelling will not exceed 110 litres per person per day. ============ END OF SCHEDULE ============ https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 5

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶11

The inspector found that the proposal would not harm the special architectural or historic significance of the listed building or its setting.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶21

The inspector found that the proposal would protect the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposed dwelling, and the existing occupiers of neighbouring dwellings, both with regard to noise pollution.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
HA1 and HA7 of the East Herts Local District Plan 2018
Determinative
Paragraph 203 of the Framework
Determinative
Policy WAT4 of the LP
Determinative
Policy NE3 of the LP
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 5 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 11 March 2024 under the Open Government Licence.