Case 3376145

2A Church Road, Bengeo, HERTFORD, SG14 3DP

East Hertfordshire District Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
23 April 2026
Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Inspector
Simms S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr & Mrs A & J Yendall
LPA reference
3/25/1411/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000242
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
26 November 2025

Summary AI

The costs application made by the applicant against East Hertfordshire District Council was dismissed. The inspector found that the applicant failed to justify exemptions from biodiversity net gain requirements and that the Council did not behave unreasonably in not having a standard template for unilateral undertakings.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

2A Church Road, Bengeo, HERTFORD, SG14 3DP — East Hertfordshire District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 20 January 2026 by S Simms BSc (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 23rd April 2026 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/J1915/W/25/3376145 2A Church Road, Hertford, Hertfordshire SG14 3DP • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr & Mrs A & J Yendall for a partial award of costs against East Hertfordshire District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the demolition of existing house and erection of a new detached, replacement dwelling with air or ground source heat pump and replacement greenhouse. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

2A Church Road, Bengeo, HERTFORD, SG14 3DP — East Hertfordshire District Council — Costs Decision In the case of appeals determined via written representations, the costs application must be normally made in writing by any party no later than the final comments stage. However, in this instance, the circumstances to which the application relates arose after that stage and I have therefore exceptionally accepted it. 4. The Council suggested a planning condition requiring the proposal to be built as a self- or custom-build dwelling. This was to ensure that it would meet the exemption claimed from biodiversity net gain requirements. However, such a condition is unlikely to be enforceable and so I invited views on a way forward. 5. This resulted in the applicant submitting a unilateral undertaking to secure the same objective as the suggested condition. The applicant considers the Council behaved unreasonably in not having a standard template for such an undertaking and thereby causing them to incur legal costs in drafting one. 6. Whilst I sympathise that biodiversity net gain is a relatively new area of law, it is for applicants and appellants to justify exemptions from its requirements and, more generally, to bear their own and the Council’s reasonable legal costs in drafting planning agreements or undertakings.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

2A Church Road, Bengeo, HERTFORD, SG14 3DP — East Hertfordshire District Council — Costs Decision The claim therefore fails.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 S Simms

2A Church Road, Bengeo, HERTFORD, SG14 3DP — East Hertfordshire District Council — S Simms INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Affordable housing
Against appellant
¶6

The applicant failed to justify exemptions from biodiversity net gain requirements, which is their responsibility to do. The Council did not behave unreasonably in not having a standard template for unilateral undertakings.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5)
Unclear

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 23 April 2026 under the Open Government Licence.