Case 3307120

Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, STAFFORD, ST20 0JQ

Stafford Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
3 April 2023
Authority
Stafford Borough Council
Inspector
Watson S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Mr S Cartmail
LPA reference
21/35219/PAR
ONS LPA code
E07000197
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
14 December 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed due to a procedural error by the local planning authority. The authority failed to notify the applicant of the refusal of prior approval within 56 days, as required by the GPDO. The development can only proceed if carried out in accordance with the submitted plans and the conditions and limitations imposed by the GPDO.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, STAFFORD, ST20 0JQ — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 21 February 2023 by Samuel Watson BA (Hons) MSc MRTPI An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 03 April 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/Y3425/W/22/3307120 Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, Stafford ST20 0JQ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant approval required under a development order. • The appeal is made by Mr S Cartmail against the decision of Stafford Borough Council. • The application Ref 21/35219/PAR, dated 10 November 2021, was refused by notice dated 2 September 2022. • The development proposed is the conversion of existing agricultural building to form dwelling house. The barn will be accessed via an existing gateway and track that will have a new visibility splay formed to meet the highways requirement. The barn sits back from the highway some 30+ metres. The proposed front elevation has a small paddock with hard standing to the rear for parking. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and prior approval is deemed to be granted. Reasons 2.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, STAFFORD, ST20 0JQ — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Under Schedule 2, Part 3, Paragraph W(11) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (the GPDO) the section ‘procedure for applications for prior approval under Part 3’ states that the development must not begin before the occurrence of one of three scenarios. These are (a) the receipt by the applicant from the local planning authority of a written notice of their determination that such prior approval is not required; (b) the receipt by the applicant from the local planning authority of a written notice giving their prior approval; or (c) the expiry of 56 days following the date on which the application under sub-paragraph 2 was received by the local planning authority without the authority notifying the applicant as to whether prior approval is given or refused. 3. The application was submitted on the 10 November 2021 and the Council issued a decision refusing the application on the 2 September 2022. This notification was issued far outside of the 56-day timescale set out above. It is clear that communications were had between the parties before the issuing of this decision, and potentially within 56 days of the Council receiving the application.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, STAFFORD, ST20 0JQ — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision However, the emails I have been provided with are from after the 56-day period and do not demonstrate a decision having been made. 4. Lacking any evidence to the contrary, I find that the Council did not notify the appellant of the refusal of prior approval before the expiry of 56 days from the date of the receipt of the application. Prior approval is therefore deemed to https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, STAFFORD, ST20 0JQ — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision However, the emails I have been provided with are from after the 56-day period and do not demonstrate a decision having been made. 4. Lacking any evidence to the contrary, I find that the Council did not notify the appellant of the refusal of prior approval before the expiry of 56 days from the date of the receipt of the application. Prior approval is therefore deemed to https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, STAFFORD, ST20 0JQ — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Y3425/W/22/3307120 have been granted by virtue of Paragraph W(11) of Schedule 2, Part 3 of GPDO. 5. As a result, I cannot address whether the development is permitted under the GPDO, despite there being dispute between the parties as to whether the development meets the requirements of paragraph Q.1. 6. However, the development can only lawfully proceed if carried out in accordance with the submitted plans and with the conditions and limitations imposed by the GPDO. It is for the appellant to satisfy themselves that the development conforms to these limitations. If it does not conform to these provisions, the GPDO does not grant planning permission and the proposed development will be at risk of enforcement action by the Council. 7. For the reasons set out above, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Samuel Watson

Yew Tree Farm, Lawnhead, STAFFORD, ST20 0JQ — Stafford Borough Council — Samuel Watson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶2

The local planning authority did not notify the applicant of the refusal of prior approval within 56 days, as required by the GPDO.

Planning obligations
Neutral
¶3

The applicant had received emails from the local planning authority, but these were after the 56-day period and did not demonstrate a decision having been made.

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶4

Lacking any evidence to the contrary, it was found that the Council did not notify the appellant of the refusal of prior approval before the expiry of 56 days from the date of the receipt of the application.

Conditions
Neutral
¶5

The development can only lawfully proceed if carried out in accordance with the submitted plans and with the conditions and limitations imposed by the GPDO.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
GPDO Schedule 2, Part 3, Paragraph W(11)
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 3 April 2023 under the Open Government Licence.