Case 3371445

George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 3BW

Stafford Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
18 November 2025
Authority
Stafford Borough Council
Inspector
Bromley N
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Richard Coleman
LPA reference
25/40650/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000197
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
21 August 2025

Summary AI

The appeal is allowed because the Council would have approved the application subject to conditions, and the proposed development would accord with the policies of the development plan.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 3BW — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 11 November 2025 by N Bromley BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 18 November 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/Y3425/W/25/3371445 George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire ST16 3BW • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a failure to give notice within the prescribed period of a decision on an application for planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr. Richard Coleman, of Housing 21 against Stafford Borough Council. • The application Ref is 25/40650/FUL. • The development proposed is to replace the fencing currently at 1m high to a 1.8m fence to Wright Street and the walkway around the court. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted to replace the fencing currently at 1m high to a 1.8m fence to Wright Street and the walkway around the court at George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire ST16 3BW in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 25/40650/FUL, subject to the following conditions: 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 3BW — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawings numbered, and / or titled: Location Plan; Site Plan; Drawing No 1 – Proposed Elevations; and Drawing No 2 – Proposed Elevations. Procedural Matters 2. In the banner heading above and my formal decision, I have used the description of development taken from the Council's acknowledgement letter, as opposed to the application form, as it more accurately and succinctly describes that for which permission is sought. However, in doing this I have also had full regard in my reasoning to the description on the application form. 3. The appeal is made against the failure of the Council to reach a decision on the planning application within the relevant statutory timeframe. The Council has submitted an appeal statement which confirms that, had it been in a position to do so, it would have approved the application subject to planning conditions. 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 3BW — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision On this basis, the Council request that I allow the appeal as there would be no conflict with Policies N1 and N8 of The Plan for Stafford Borough 2011-2031, which seek to strengthen the continuity of street frontages and be sympathetic, and take into account the amenity of adjacent residential areas, be safe, secure and crime resistant. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 3BW — Stafford Borough Council — Appeal Decision On this basis, the Council request that I allow the appeal as there would be no conflict with Policies N1 and N8 of The Plan for Stafford Borough 2011-2031, which seek to strengthen the continuity of street frontages and be sympathetic, and take into account the amenity of adjacent residential areas, be safe, secure and crime resistant. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/Y3425/W/25/3371445 5. On the evidence before me, and my observations during the site visit, I see no reason to disagree. Therefore, I conclude that the proposed development would accord with the policies of the development plan. Conditions 6. Standard conditions relating to the time limit for implementation and conformity with the approved plans are reasonable and necessary. Conclusion 7. For the reasons given above the appeal is allowed.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 N Bromley

George Hill Court, Fancy Walk, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 3BW — Stafford Borough Council — N Bromley INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
For appellant
¶4

The Council would have approved the application subject to conditions, so there is no conflict with policies.

Heritage impact
For appellant
¶5

The inspector saw no reason to disagree with the proposed development, and it would accord with the policies of the development plan.

Flood risk
Neutral

Not mentioned as a relevant issue.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
N1, N8
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 18 November 2025 under the Open Government Licence.