Case 3295702

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL

Erewash Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
19 August 2022
Authority
Erewash Borough Council
Inspector
Moulton E
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Danny Jackson
LPA reference
ERE/1121/0064
ONS LPA code
E07000036
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
1 June 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for a detached bungalow on a backland site was dismissed due to harm to the character and appearance of the area. The Inspector found that the proposal would be in marked contrast with the surrounding houses and cause a cramped appearance. The proposal was also found to provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, but this was outweighed by the harm to the character and appearance of the area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 19 July 2022 by Elaine Moulton BA (Hons) BPl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 19 August 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/N1025/W/22/3295702 Land to the rear of 36 Portland Road, Sawley, Nottingham NG10 3FL • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Danny Jackson against the decision of Erewash Borough Council. • The application Ref ERE/1121/0064, dated 22 November 2021, was refused by notice dated 3 March 2022. • The development proposed is the erection of a detached bungalow. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issues 2. The main issues are: • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and • Whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling and maintained for neighbouring occupants, with particular regard to garden area, privacy and light. Reasons Character and appearance of the area 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Appeal Decision The appeal site was formerly part of the rear garden of 36 Portland Road but now forms a separate parcel of land accessed off a short highway spur that provides vehicular access to a few existing dwellings. The site is unused and overgrown. 4. Whilst there is some variation to the design of properties on Portland Road, the predominant character comprises two-storey semi-detached, hipped roof dwellings of similar proportions. They are set back from the road with small front gardens and have a generally consistent building line except for corner plots and a limited group of dwellings set behind a grass verge. The dwellings that front onto the short highway spur, from which the proposal gains access, form a continuation of the line of dwellings along one side of the stretch of Portland Road that joins with Draycott Road. 5. The proposed bungalow would be sited to the rear of No 36, projecting out to the side and occupying a central position at the end of the stretch of Portland Road off Draycott Road. It would be prominent in such views, even if the mature boundary planting is retained. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N1025/W/22/3295702 6. The absence of windows and the extent of blank brickwork on the elevation facing towards the street would be in marked contrast with the appearance of the surrounding houses. Moreover, the proposed backland form of development would give rise to a cramped appearance at odds with the prevailing character of the area, due to the limited space around it and its close proximity to the rear of No 36. It would have a jarring and unacceptable relationship with the street scene which would be harmful to the character and appearance of the area. Such harm is not reduced by it being sited broadly in line with the existing dwelling to the rear, which is accessed off a different road and does not form a key component of the appeal site context. 7. Therefore, the proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, contrary to the design aims of Policy 10 of the Erewash Core Strategy (CS), Saved Policy H12 of Erewash Borough Local Plan (LP) and the National Planning Policy Framework. Living conditions 8. The Council consider that the resulting garden area for No 36 and the development would be inadequate.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Appeal Decision I consider that both garden areas, although not extensive, would provide sufficient space to be utilised and enjoyed by the occupants of the respective property for incidental purposes, such as play, sitting out and drying laundry. As such the quantity of space is appropriate for the existing dwelling as well as the proposed. 9. The rear windows of No 36 would look towards the rear garden of the proposed dwelling over the rear garden of No 36 and the driveway of the proposed dwelling. Overlooking of rear gardens is typical and accepted within most residential areas. In this case the distance attained, when the driveway of the appeal property is factored in, is similar to that between the existing dwellings on the corner opposite No 36 and the properties they back onto. As such a comparable level of overlooking already occurs in this area. 10. The separation distance that would be achieved from first floor windows of No 36 and the development would ensure that the degree of overlooking and loss of privacy would not be so unacceptable to justify dismissing the appeal on these grounds.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Appeal Decision The erection of a suitable boundary treatment, which could be secured by condition, would prevent overlooking from ground floor windows of No 36. The relationship between No 36 and the development is acceptable, therefore. 11. Concern has been expressed about the potential loss of privacy enjoyed by occupants of 32 and 34 Portland Road. The development includes windows on the elevation looking toward the windows in the front elevations of these dwellings. However, the windows already experience some passive overlooking given that they front onto a road, notwithstanding that they are sited on a spur off the main carriageway. In such circumstances the development would not materially and unacceptably reduce levels of privacy. 12. The development is single storey with a hipped roof that reduces the overall bulk and massing of the building. Given the scale of the development and the separation distance that is achieved the occupants of No 32 and 34 would not experience an unacceptable loss of daylight or sunlight. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N1025/W/22/3295702 13. Taking the factors set out in the preceding two paragraphs into consideration I conclude that the effect of the development on the occupants of No 32 and 34, having regard to privacy and light, would be acceptable. 14. The occupants of 292 Tamworth Road would not experience an unacceptable loss of light as the proposal is located to the side of that property. Its main outlook is to the front and rear and would largely be unaffected by the proposed building. 15. Any noise or disturbance during construction would be for a temporary period only and the effects could be appropriately controlled by condition. 16. Accordingly, the proposal would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling. It would also maintain appropriate living conditions for neighbouring occupiers. This would be compliant with Policy 10 of the CS and Saved Policies H12 and DC1 of the LP which seek to ensure that there is no detrimental effect on residential amenity of adjacent properties from new development. Other Matters 17.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Appeal Decision I have had regard to other matters raised including flood risk, the impact of the widening of the highway and provision of additional parking on the accesses to existing properties, and highways safety. However, I have not pursued these matters further as I am dismissing the appeal. Conclusion 18. Whilst I have found that the proposal would provide and maintain appropriate living conditions this does not outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the area that I have identified. The proposed development conflicts with the development plan when considered as a whole and there are no material considerations, either individually or in combination, that outweighs the identified harm and associated development plan conflict. 19. I hereby dismiss this appeal.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Elaine Moulton

36 Portland Road, Long Eaton, NOTTINGHAM, NG10 3FL — Erewash Borough Council — Elaine Moulton INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶3-5

The proposed bungalow would be in marked contrast with the surrounding houses and cause a cramped appearance, due to its limited space and close proximity to the rear of No 36.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6-7

The proposal would have a jarring and unacceptable relationship with the street scene, and would harm the character and appearance of the area.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶8-10

The Inspector found that the garden area for No 36 and the development would be sufficient, and that the separation distance would ensure that the degree of overlooking and loss of privacy would not be unacceptable.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶11-12

The Inspector found that the development would not materially and unacceptably reduce levels of privacy, and that the occupants of No 32 and 34 would not experience an unacceptable loss of daylight or sunlight.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶13-16

The Inspector concluded that the effect of the development on the occupants of No 32 and 34, having regard to privacy and light, would be acceptable.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy 10 of the Erewash Core Strategy (CS)
Substantial
Saved Policy H12 of Erewash Borough Local Plan (LP)
Substantial
Saved Policy DC1 of the LP
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 19 August 2022 under the Open Government Licence.