Case 3291733

35 Donnington Gardens , Scunthorpe , Lincolnshire, DN15 7RJ

North Lincolnshire Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
8 July 2022
Authority
North Lincolnshire Council
Inspector
Clowes M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
M S A Zaman
LPA reference
PA/2021/1001
ONS LPA code
E06000013
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
20 April 2022

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs against North Lincolnshire Council was dismissed because the Council's decision was reasonable and not unreasonable behaviour as described in the PPG.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

35 Donnington Gardens , Scunthorpe , Lincolnshire, DN15 7RJ — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 15 June 2022 by M Clowes BA (hons) MCD PG CERT (Arch Con) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 8 July 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/Y2003/W/22/3291733 35 Donnington Gardens, Scunthorpe DN15 7RJ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by S A Zaman for a full award of costs against North Lincolnshire Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for ‘extension and alterations to provide a 6 bedroom HMO.’ Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

35 Donnington Gardens , Scunthorpe , Lincolnshire, DN15 7RJ — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision It goes on to state that local planning authorities are at risk of an award of costs if they behave unreasonably with respect to the substance of the matter under appeal, for example, by failing to substantiate each reason for refusal or by making vague, generalised or inaccurate assertions about a proposals impact. 4. The Council’s decision notice is specific and relevant to the proposal. The reasons for refusal are clearly articulated and state the policies of the development plan that the proposal would be in conflict with. Notwithstanding the Officer recommendation, the apportionment of weight is a matter for the decision maker. The minutes from the planning committee meeting indicate that there were a range of speakers on the proposal raising concerns on a number of matters including noise and highway safety. It appears from the evidence, that the committee attached different weight to the site context, residents’ views and Environmental Health and Housing and Highway Authority consultation responses, as is their right.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

35 Donnington Gardens , Scunthorpe , Lincolnshire, DN15 7RJ — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision This matter does not amount to unreasonable behaviour on the part of the Council but instead, highlights the difference of opinion between the parties, in respect of the planning merits of the proposal. 5. In my decision I have found that the Council had reasonable concerns about the impact of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers which justified its decision. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

35 Donnington Gardens , Scunthorpe , Lincolnshire, DN15 7RJ — North Lincolnshire Council — Costs Decision This matter does not amount to unreasonable behaviour on the part of the Council but instead, highlights the difference of opinion between the parties, in respect of the planning merits of the proposal. 5. In my decision I have found that the Council had reasonable concerns about the impact of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers which justified its decision. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/Y2003/W/22/3291733 6. The applicant suggests that planning permission would not be required to change the use of a dwelling to a Class C4 house in multiple occupation (HMO). However, the change of use was part of the development scheme and the description was set out by the applicant on the planning application form. The Council determined the proposal that was before them and in this regard, I do not find unreasonable behaviour. Conclusion 7. I find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the PPG, has not been demonstrated. Therefore, an award of costs is not justified.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 M Clowes

35 Donnington Gardens , Scunthorpe , Lincolnshire, DN15 7RJ — North Lincolnshire Council — M Clowes INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶4

The Council's decision notice was specific and relevant to the proposal, and the reasons for refusal were clearly articulated.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶4

The Council had reasonable concerns about the impact of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.

Other
Against appellant
¶5

The applicant suggested that planning permission would not be required to change the use of a dwelling to a Class C4 house in multiple occupation (HMO), but this was part of the development scheme and the Council determined the proposal accordingly.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 208
Limited
Local Plan D1
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 July 2022 under the Open Government Licence.