SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ
East Hertfordshire District Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Inspector
- Boniface M
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appellant
- Mr Simon Constantine
- Agent
- AGW Architecture
- LPA reference
- 3/21/1364/HH
- ONS LPA code
- E07000242
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Lead
- Start date
- 10 February 2022
Summary AI
The appeals were dismissed due to the proposal's failure to preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II listed building, Sprangewell Centre. The proposed enclosed porch would detract from the building's symmetry and balance, and no public benefits were identified to outweigh the harm.
PDF text
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — by Michael Boniface MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13th September 2022
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — Sprangewell Centre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, Hertfordshire, SG12 0SQ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Simon Constance against the decision of East Hertfordshire District Council. • The application Ref. 3/21/1364/HH, dated 20 May 2021, was refused by notice dated 30 July 2021. • The development proposed is removal of the existing flat roofed porch and replacement with an enclosed porch.
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — Sprangewell Centre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, Hertfordshire, SG12 0SQ • The appeal is made under section 20 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 against a refusal to grant listed building consent. • The appeal is made by Simon Constance against the decision of East Hertfordshire District Council. • The application Ref. 3/21/1365/LBC, dated 20 May 2021, was refused by notice dated 30 July 2021. • The works proposed are removal of the existing flat roofed porch and replacement with an enclosed porch; and internal alterations to remove an existing sliding door and frame and block up opening, insert new door and replace Acrow prop supporting steel beam in the cellar.
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — been removed, the opening blocked, and a new door installed as shown on the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — been removed, the opening blocked, and a new door installed as shown on the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decisions APP/J1915/W/21/3284616, APP/J1915/Y/21/3283908 proposed plans. Notwithstanding this, I have considered the appeal on the basis of the plans submitted. Main Issue 6. The main issue is whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, Sprangewell Centre, Poles Lane, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses. Reasons 7. Sprangewell Centre is listed at Grade II and forms the middle terrace of one of three dwellings within a large former house dating from the early C19 and incorporating a C17 building. The building is an impressive two storey white- painted brick building with pedimented stucco centre Dart framed by pilasters, topped by a large triangular pediment. It presents a high degree of symmetry despite its subdivision into three properties and some later alterations. All of this contributes to the buildings significant architectural and historic interest. 8. There is an existing porch canopy over the door serving Sprangewell Centre that appears to be a relatively modern and rather crude addition to the building, with its plywood and felt roof construction.
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — been removed, the opening blocked, and a new door installed as shown on the That said, its simple supports make it a lightweight structure that obscures the existing building only to a limited extent. Whilst its removal would be a heritage benefit, I am not persuaded by the brief Heritage Statement submitted that this would justify the proposed enclosed porch. The proposed porch would detract from the strong symmetry and balance of the existing building and highlight the multiple entrances now serving the building. 9. A similar porch to that being sought has been constructed at Sprangewell West, but that structure is less prominent when viewed from the public realm, and in any case does not justify further harm to the listed building. 10. The relocation of a doorway to the kitchen within a modern stud partition wall and replacement of relatively modern kitchen units would have a neutral effect on the listed building. The submitted plans are clear that these works would not affect historic fabric and I am therefore satisfied that sufficient information has been provided to assess the proposal. The existing Acrow prop in the cellar is showing signs of corrosion and its replacement with a more permanent solution would protect the longevity of the listed building. 11.
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — been removed, the opening blocked, and a new door installed as shown on the Overall, the harm to the listed building would be less than substantial in the terms of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) but is nevertheless of considerable importance and weight. No public benefits have been identified that would outweigh this harm, notwithstanding that the existing insensitive porch would be removed and the replacement of an existing Acrow prop would be a beneficial measure in the long-term maintenance of the building. 12. The proposal would fail to preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II listed building. This would fail to satisfy the requirements of the Act, paragraph 197 of the Framework and conflict with policies HA1 and HA7 of the East Herts District Plan 2018, which seek to conserve heritage assets. As a result, the proposal would not be in accordance with the development plan. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — been removed, the opening blocked, and a new door installed as shown on the Appeal Decisions APP/J1915/W/21/3284616, APP/J1915/Y/21/3283908
SprangewellCentre, Poles Lane, Thundridge, SG12 0SQ — East Hertfordshire District Council — INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
Main issues and findings
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶7
The existing porch canopy is a relatively modern and crude addition to the building, but its removal would be a heritage benefit. However, the proposed enclosed porch would detract from the building's symmetry and balance.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶9
A similar porch has been constructed at Sprangewell West, but it is less prominent and does not justify further harm to the listed building.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶12
The proposal would fail to preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II listed building, failing to satisfy the requirements of the Act and conflicting with policies HA1 and HA7 of the East Herts District Plan 2018.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| NPPF 208 |
Limited |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 13 September 2022 under the Open Government Licence.