Case 3279322

11-15 London Road, Sawbridgeworth, CM21 9EH

East Hertfordshire District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
7 February 2022
Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Inspector
Miles H
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Geoff Hewson
Agent
Architecture Shop
LPA reference
3/21/0539/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000242
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
9 November 2021

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs against East Hertfordshire District Council was dismissed as the inspector found no unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense during the appeal process.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

11-15 London Road, Sawbridgeworth, CM21 9EH — East Hertfordshire District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 19 January 2022 by H Miles BA(hons), MA, MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 07 FEBRUARY 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/J1915/W/21/3279322 11, 13, 15 London Road, Sawbridgeworth CM21 9EH • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Geoffrey Hewson of Swayprime Ltd for a full award of costs against East Hertfordshire District Council. • The appeal was against the failure of the Council to issue a notice of their decision within the prescribed period on an application for creation of a crossover to the newly levelled parking area and 2 off-street parking spaces for the 11, 13 and 15 London Rd properties. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is dismissed. Reasons 2. An award of costs may be allowed where it is found that a party behaves unreasonably, and the unreasonable behaviour has directly caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

11-15 London Road, Sawbridgeworth, CM21 9EH — East Hertfordshire District Council — Costs Decision The appellant’s case is that the Council did not determine the planning application within the statutory time limit, and therefore the appellant has incurred wasted costs in submitting the appeal. 4. It can be seen in the Council’s evidence that if they had determined the application, it would have been refused. Therefore, although it is unfortunate that the application was not determined within the statutory time limit, the appeal would have been necessary in any case. Furthermore, it can be seen in my main decision that I do not find that this is development that should clearly be permitted. 5. Consequently, for the reasons set out above, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense during the appeal process has not been demonstrated. 6. For this reason, neither a full nor partial award of costs is justified.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 H Miles

11-15 London Road, Sawbridgeworth, CM21 9EH — East Hertfordshire District Council — H Miles INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Parking
Against appellant
¶3

The appellant's case that the council did not determine the planning application within the statutory time limit and thus incurred wasted costs is not supported by the inspector's main decision.

Parking
Against appellant
¶4

The inspector notes that even if the council had determined the application within the statutory time limit, it would have been refused, making the appeal necessary in any case.

Parking
Against appellant
¶5

The inspector concludes that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense during the appeal process has not been demonstrated.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 7 February 2022 under the Open Government Licence.