Case 3376007

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR

Wyre Forest District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
15 June 2026
Authority
Wyre Forest District Council
Inspector
Boughton A
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr and Mrs A Ness
LPA reference
25/0623/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000239
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
24 February 2026

Summary AI

The appeal for a live-work unit in the green belt was dismissed due to insufficient information on building levels and potential impact on character and appearance of the area. The proposal would have resulted in a replacement building with a larger footprint and increased height, which could have impaired openness and harmed character and appearance.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 22 May 2026 by A. J. Boughton MA (IPSD) Dip.Arch. Dip.(Conservation) RIBA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date:15 June 2026 Appeal Ref: APP/R1845/W/25/3376007 Foxwood Manor 204-206 Wilden Lane Stourport-on-Severn DY13 9JR • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr & Mrs A Ness against the decision of Wyre Forest District Council. • The application Ref is 25/0623/FUL • The development proposed is Demolition of ancillary office building and replacement with a live-work unit. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed Preliminary Matter 2. The Council have provided two refusal reasons in which the first refers to impact upon openness arising from the increased size of the proposal compared to what they identify as a fallback position, a previously granted consent for a similar development (Ref:25/0120/FUL) making reference to Paragraph 154(g) of the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework).

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Although the Council have justified their refusal on that basis, the development would amount to a replacement building in the green belt and main issues are identified accordingly. Main Issues 3. The main issues are: • whether the proposed live-work unit would be inappropriate development in the green belt and if so, whether very special circumstances exist to clearly outweigh harms arising, and • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area Reasons Green Belt 4. The appeal site is a single storey ancillary workshop/office building within the large curtilage of Foxley Manor in a part of the Green Belt that lies between the towns of Kidderminster and Stourport on Severn, featuring sporadic development or small clusters of housing within a generally undeveloped and often undulating terrain. The building to be replaced sits in a relatively elevated position on sloping ground against the backdrop of woodland behind (east), the frontage area sloping down to https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/R1845/W/25/3376007 the general ground level at the entrance to the larger site and the main house. It is not disputed that the appeal site is previously developed land, and it is apparent that the proposal would be a complete redevelopment, resulting in a building with an enlarged footprint and an additional storey. 5. The National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) requires that substantial weight is given to any harm to the Green Belt stating that development, subject to specified exceptions, is inappropriate and by definition harmful to the Green Belt. Paragraph 154(g), which the Council acknowledge as a relevant exception to inappropriateness in this matter, allows that partial or complete redevelopment of previously developed land is not-inappropriate development subject to the provision that it would not cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt. 6. Openness has both spatial and visual components which may be perceived contextually. The wider area is generally open and partly wooded land following the River Stour but inset with pockets of development, some of which are large.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision In this case the appeal site and adjoining curtilage of Foxwood Manor presents as a small isolated incursion into the enclosing wooded area having negligible impact upon the openness of this part of the Green Belt. Consequently, the insertion of a bulkier, taller, or high-placed building could significantly impair openness. 7. The proposal would replace a small building with a much larger one in terms of footprint and height. Although it seems intended that the additional storey would be set down into the sloping ground, it is not clear to me whether the larger roof area would be set at the same level as the existing building and that is a significant uncertainty. However, were that to be the case1, an assumption I address subsequently, there would be limited harm to openness and on that basis the proposal would be not-inappropriate development in the Green Belt by virtue of paragraph 154(g) of the Framework. Character and Appearance 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision The proposed development would result in a two storey live-work building although, as the original much smaller building would be demolished, it is not clear from the very limited information provided, topographical information being wholly absent, how the proposal would relate to the ground levels surrounding the building. The existing building and its curtilage is largely hidden from users of the adjacent lane, being screened by perimeter planting and a high fence and set within enclosing woodland. In terms of the impact of the proposed development upon character and appearance of the area the existing setting is sensitive to change from the insertion of built form and I consider it to be a matter of great importance to establish whether the resulting building would be more prominent in terms of height2 than the existing building. 9. The proposed building has a defined height3 but no existing or proposed ground/floor levels are provided.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision In addition, the absence of suitable topographical information prevents consideration as to the proposed building’s position and level in relation to surrounding land and whether significant other works of retention 1 That the ridge of the proposed building would be no higher than that of the building to be demolished 2 Meaning here, the level of the proposed building, and in particular its roof, in relation to surrounding land 3 If scaled from the plans provided https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision In addition, the absence of suitable topographical information prevents consideration as to the proposed building’s position and level in relation to surrounding land and whether significant other works of retention 1 That the ridge of the proposed building would be no higher than that of the building to be demolished 2 Meaning here, the level of the proposed building, and in particular its roof, in relation to surrounding land 3 If scaled from the plans provided https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/R1845/W/25/3376007 walling and/or excavation might arise. Such works would likely impact upon the character and appearance of the resulting development but are not addressed in the submission. Levels information absent the result could, in the alternative, be a building which, when constructed, exceeds an acceptable height. Consequently I am unable to conclude whether the proposal would be a satisfactory form of development which, having regard to the required ordinary planning balance, would not conflict with the relevant policies of the development plan as set out in the Council’s second refusal reason. Conclusion 10. I have concluded that the development would be not-inappropriate development in the Green Belt with the important provision that the level of the new roof would be no higher than that of the existing building to be demolished. However, levels information absent, a condition to that effect would not be enforceable. For that same reason I have also been unable to conclude that the development would not harm the character and appearance of the area. 11.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Although matters of detail may usually be addressed through the application of suitable conditions, in this case there is insufficient information provided to indicate that the resulting building would have a suitable relationship with the surrounding land and that a grant of consent would not result in unforeseen harm. The question of height, position and layout go to the heart of the decision to be made and it would be an improper use of my power to grant consent with such a high degree of uncertainty as to the outcome of that permission due to deficiencies in information. On that basis the appeal is dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Andrew Boughton

Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR — Wyre Forest District Council — Andrew Boughton INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶4

The appeal site is previously developed land, and the proposal would be a complete redevelopment, resulting in a building with an enlarged footprint and an additional storey. The National Planning Policy Framework requires substantial weight to be given to any harm to the Green Belt, and the proposal would cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt.

Character and appearance
Neutral
¶8

The proposed development would result in a two-storey live-work building, and it is not clear from the limited information provided how the proposal would relate to the ground levels surrounding the building. The existing setting is sensitive to change from the insertion of built form, and it is a matter of great importance to establish whether the resulting building would be more prominent in terms of height than the existing building.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 154(g)
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 15 June 2026 under the Open Government Licence.