Case 3375865

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ

Breckland Council — appeal invalid

Outcome
Invalid
Decision date
27 February 2026
Authority
Breckland Council
Inspector
Fern L
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Davidge Developments Ltd
LPA reference
PL/2025/0463/FMIN
ONS LPA code
E07000143
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
27 November 2025

Summary AI

The appeal is dismissed due to invalidity. The original application did not comply with the DMPO, and the appeal form also had shortcomings. The inspector was unable to determine the appeal and declined to consider its merits.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ — Breckland Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 3 February 2026 by L Fern BA(Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 27 February 2026 Appeal Ref: APP/F2605/W/25/3375865 The Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham NR17 1LQ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Davidge Developments Limited against the decision of Breckland Council. • The application Ref is PL/2025/0463/FMIN. • The development proposed is construction of 3No self-build dwellings. Decision 1. The appeal is invalid and therefore I am unable to determine it. Preliminary Matters 2. The description of development in the banner heading above has been taken from the decision notice and is more accurate than that on the application form. Correspondence has been received from the appellant confirming acceptance. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ — Breckland Council — Appeal Decision Section 79(6) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) provides that if, before or during the determination of an appeal the Secretary of State forms the opinion that planning permission for that development could not have been granted by the local planning authority, they may decline to determine the appeal or to proceed with the determination. Reasons 4. Article 13(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (the DMPO) sets out that an applicant for planning permission must give requisite notice of the application to any person, other than the applicant, who on the prescribed date is an owner of the land to which the application relates. Article 14 of the DMPO requires where an application for planning permission is made, the applicant must certify that the relevant requirements of Article 13 have been satisfied. 5. Furthermore, the Planning Practice Guidance advises that the planning system entitles anyone to apply for permission to develop any plot of land. However, an applicant is required to notify owners of the land, and they must sign an ownership certificate to which the application relates. 6.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ — Breckland Council — Appeal Decision On the application form the appellant has completed Ownership Certificate A which indicates that 21 days before the date of the application nobody except the applicant was the owner of any part of the land and that none of the land is, or is part of, an agricultural holding. Similarly, on the appeal form the appellant has https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ — Breckland Council — Appeal Decision On the application form the appellant has completed Ownership Certificate A which indicates that 21 days before the date of the application nobody except the applicant was the owner of any part of the land and that none of the land is, or is part of, an agricultural holding. Similarly, on the appeal form the appellant has https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ — Breckland Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/F2605/W/25/3375865 completed Ownership Certificate A which indicates the same as above, but 21 days before the date of the appeal instead. 7. However, the introductory paragraphs of the appellant’s Appeal Statement of Case1 state that the appellant is acting as agent on behalf of the landowner. Correspondence with the appellant has confirmed this position. 8. It is acknowledged that members of the landowner’s family are referenced in several supporting documents submitted with the appeal and that the appellant has stated that it is the landowner’s family’s intention to occupy the proposed dwellings. However, the Unilateral Undertaking (UU) before me that seeks to secure the self-build status of the proposed dwellings is incomplete, having not been signed by the landowner. Furthermore, although signed Self-build Confirmation Statements2 have been provided, they are vague in identifying the precise location of the site they relate to on Attleborough Road and do not contain any reference to this proposal, such as the Council’s application reference number. 9. I have found that the original application did not comply with the requirements of the DMPO and thus is invalid.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ — Breckland Council — Appeal Decision Furthermore, the information provided with the appeal is insufficient for me to be satisfied that the failure to comply with statutory requirements has since been rectified. I am therefore unable to determine the appeal, and it is not necessary for me to consider the merits of the development. Conclusion 10. For the reasons given above, I conclude that planning permission could not have been granted by the local planning authority due to the procedural failings that I have identified, and I am unable to consider the planning merits of the appeal. I therefore conclude that the appeal is invalid, I decline to determine it and shall take no further action.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 L Fern

Land Adjacent the Old Queens Head, Attleborough Road, Great Ellingham, Attleborough, Norfolk, NR17 1LQ — Breckland Council — L Fern INSPECTOR 1 Prepared by Limitless Developments. 2 Prepared by Limitless Developments, dated 16 May 2025 and signed by members of the landowner’s family. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶4

The applicant failed to provide requisite notice of the application to the landowner and sign an ownership certificate as required by the DMPO.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶5

The planning system requires applicants to notify owners of the land and sign an ownership certificate. The appellant failed to do so.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶8

The Unilateral Undertaking (UU) was incomplete as it had not been signed by the landowner.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶9

The information provided with the appeal was insufficient to rectify the procedural failings.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
DMPO
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 27 February 2026 under the Open Government Licence.