Case 3375345

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS

Ashford Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
12 February 2026
Authority
Ashford Borough Council
Inspector
Jolly J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mrs Andrea Saunders
LPA reference
PA/2025/1205
ONS LPA code
E07000105
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
14 November 2025

Summary AI

The appeal for the conversion of an annex to a dwelling was allowed due to the suitability of the location, despite being outside the settlement boundary. The inspector considered the proximity to Bethersden village and the access to amenities in Ashford and Tenterden as key factors in their decision.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 9 February 2026 by J E Jolly BA (Hons) MA MSc MCIH MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12th February 2026 Appeal Ref: APP/E2205/W/25/3375345 Little Etchden, Etchden Chase, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent TN26 3DS • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mrs A Saunders against the decision of Ashford Borough Council. • The application Ref is PA/2025/1205. • The development proposed is for the conversion of an annex to a dwelling. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the conversion of an annex to a dwelling at Little Etchden, Etchden Chase, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent TN26 3DS in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref PA/2025/1205, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the conditions set out in the attached schedule. Preliminary Matters 2. It is noted that a draft Ashford Local Plan 2042 has been subject to a regulation 18 consultation.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — Appeal Decision However, as this Plan is yet to be adopted, the Council have relied upon Policies contained within the extant Ashford Local Plan (2019) (ALP) on its decision notice. I have proceeded accordingly. Main Issue 3. The main issue in this appeal is whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location. Reasons 4. The appeal building faces onto Etchden Road and is located outside a settlement boundary approximately 1km from the village of Bethersden. The village includes a post office/village shop, a butchers, a hairdressers, a village hall, a public house, a bus service to the towns of Ashford and Tenterden, a play park and a primary school. 5. The site is linked to Bethersden by Fridd Lane and Old Surrenden Manor Road/Pluckley Road both of which are unlit with grass verges. Made footways for pedestrians walking along the highway from the appeal site commence adjacent to the built form along Mill Road as it runs towards the centre of Bethersden. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/E2205/W/25/3375345 6. The appellant has brought to my attention a number of schemes in support of her case1. However, I have limited detail of those schemes before me, some of which are in a different location altogether. Moreover, I concur with the Council that every application should be considered on its own planning merits. 7. As such, I note that the appellant regularly makes her way to the village by foot. However, as the occupation of the proposed dwelling is likely to change over time, the partially lit national speed limit and mostly grass-verged route that leads from Little Etchden to Bethersden village is likely to be unattractive to some pedestrians and cyclists, particularly at certain times of the day and during the colder months of the year. 8. Moreover, given the relatively limited choice of shops in Bethersden, the wide range of facilities, services and the rail links for wider travel which can be found further afield in Ashford and Tenterden would be very desirable to occupiers of the new dwelling. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Consequently, both the shops of Bethersden and the comprehensive day to day services found in Ashford and Tenterden are likely to be accessed by the future occupiers of the new dwelling by using a motor vehicle rather than by foot/cycle or the relatively limited bus service. 10. Nonetheless, the use of a motor vehicle to access those services would be similar to the occupiers of recent developments nearby2. Furthermore, as set out in the appellant’s submitted transport note, the total number of journeys generated by one new dwelling, even when combined with the vehicle movements associated with the host dwelling and the other residential properties along this section of Etchden Road, would be very modest. 11. Overall, and in the planning judgement, I conclude that the proposal would meet the aims of Policies SP1 and HOU5 of the ALP which say, amongst other things, that development should provide a mix of housing types and sizes to meet the changing needs of the Borough’s population, as supported by Paragraph 83 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) which says housing should be located where it will enhance or maintain the vitality of rural communities. Conditions 12.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — Appeal Decision I have considered Paragraph 56 of the Framework, and the national Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) and imposed the following conditions: 13. For certainty a standard time limit condition, and for the avoidance of doubt, a condition requiring that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans. 14. In the interests of amenity and wildlife there are conditions related to landscaping, lighting and boundary treatments. To encourage sustainable travel there are conditions for cycle storage and electric vehicle charging. To manage the risk of flood on the site, a drainage condition is necessary. 1 PA/2024/0975, PA/2023/2108, PA/2025/0486, PA/2024/0820 and APP/E2205/W/24/3342137 2 22/00875/AS, 12/01230/AS and 16/01271/AS https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/E2205/W/25/3375345 15. As the self-build scheme is exempted from the requirements of Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG), an ecological enhancement condition would not be reasonable for a scheme of this size. 16. In addition, the Framework states that planning conditions should not be used to restrict national permitted development rights unless there is clear justification to do so. As any future development would be subject to a separate application to the Council, and as there is no substantiated justification before me, this condition is not imposed. Conclusions 17. The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted, subject to the conditions set out in Schedule A.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 J E Jolly

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — J E Jolly INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 3 · Chunk 7 J E Jolly

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — J E Jolly INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3 Appeal Decision APP/E2205/W/25/3375345 Schedule A – Conditions 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision. 2) The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans: • Site Location - 01 Rev 00, • Proposed Plans - 05 Rev 00, • Proposed Elevations - 06 Rev 00; and, • Proposed Site Layout Plan 07. 3) Prior to first occupation of the dwelling details of both hard and soft landscape works must have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. These details shall include a statement setting out the design objectives for lighting and floodlighting, boundary treatments, fencing and soft landscaping, including their positions, height, design and materials. 4) The approved soft landscaping scheme shall be carried out fully within 12 months of the completion of the development. Any trees or other plants which within a period of five years from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of a similar size and species.

Page 4 · Chunk 8 J E Jolly

'Etchden Chase' at Little Etchden, Etchden Road, Bethersden, Kent, TN26 3DS — Ashford Borough Council — J E Jolly 5) Prior to the first occupation of the development, bicycle storage shall be provided in accordance with details which shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority and thereafter shall be retained solely for that purpose. 6) Prior to the first occupation of the dwelling, at least one all electric vehicle charger point shall be provided to a specification agreed in writing by the local planning authority and be retained in working order thereafter. 7) The dwelling hereby permitted shall not be occupied until the sustainable drainage system for the site has been agreed in writing by the local planning authority. *****End of Conditions***** https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶4

The appeal building faces onto Etchden Road and is located outside a settlement boundary approximately 1km from the village of Bethersden.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶7

The partially lit national speed limit and mostly grass-verged route that leads from Little Etchden to Bethersden village is likely to be unattractive to some pedestrians and cyclists.

Housing land supply
For appellant
¶9

The future occupiers of the new dwelling are likely to access the wider range of facilities, services, and rail links in Ashford and Tenterden using a motor vehicle, rather than by foot/cycle or the relatively limited bus service.

Flood risk
For appellant
¶11

The total number of journeys generated by one new dwelling, even when combined with the vehicle movements associated with the host dwelling and other residential properties along this section of Etchden Road, would be very modest.

Heritage impact
Neutral

No specific mention of heritage impact in the decision letter.

Parking
Neutral

No specific mention of parking in the decision letter.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
SP1 and HOU5 of the ALP
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 12 February 2026 under the Open Government Licence.