Case 3374879

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP

Somerset Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
13 February 2026
Authority
Somerset Council
Inspector
Marigold O
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Mrs Dide Lucas
LPA reference
2025/0887/PAA
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
28 October 2025

Summary AI

The appeal for a change of use of an agricultural building to a residential use was dismissed due to non-compliance with the GPDO's curtilage requirements. The proposal was determined under the old rules, as the application was made before the May 2025 deadline for transitional arrangements. The inspector considered the original plans and information as determined by the Council, and found that the proposal did not comply with the GPDO's curtilage requirements.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 2 February 2026 by O Marigold BSc DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13 February 2026 Appeal Ref: APP/E3335/W/25/3374879 Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Hoares Lane, Babington, Frome, Somerset BA11 3RP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant approval required under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). • The appeal is made by Mrs Dide Lucas against the decision of Somerset Council. • The application Ref is 2025/0887/PAA. • The development proposed is Prior Approval for a proposed change of use of agricultural building to 1no. dwellinghouses (Class C3) and for associated operational development. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Background and Main Issue 2. Class Q of the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO) permits the change of use of an agricultural building, and any land within its curtilage, to a residential use, and any building operations reasonably necessary to convert the building. Amendments to Class Q took effect from 21 May 2024.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision However, under temporary transitional arrangements, applications could be made until May 2025 for development which would have been compliant with the previous rules. The appeal involves such a scheme, and I shall determine it under the old rules. 3. The proposal seeks to convert an existing modern barn to form a single dwelling. The Council’s Decision Notice contained no reasons for refusal. However, Its concerns were set out in the Officer Report and subsequently, and are agreed between the Council and the appellant. I am satisfied that no party would be prejudiced by my determining the appeal on this basis. 4. For the purposes of Class Q, under Paragraph X of Part 3 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO, ‘curtilage’ means the lesser of (a) the piece of land, immediately beside or around the building, closely associated with it and serving its purposes; or (b) an area of land immediately beside or around the building no larger than the land area occupied by the agricultural building. Amongst other things, a matter of dispute is whether the proposal accords with the curtilage requirements of the GPDO. 5.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision The main issue is whether the proposal complies with the description of permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of the GPDO in respect of its curtilage. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision The main issue is whether the proposal complies with the description of permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of the GPDO in respect of its curtilage. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3374879 Reasons 6. The application submission included plans with a red line encompassing land around the appeal site, and the access track. A Site Block Plan showed landscaping and hardstanding around the building, within the red line. The appellant’s Planning Statement specifically states that the red line boundary defines the residential curtilage. There is no dispute that the area shown thus in the originally submitted Site Block Plan significantly exceeds the limit set out at GPDO Paragraph X of Part 3. 7. At appeal stage, the appellant has provided an amended plan. This has the same red line as previously, but shows sub-divisions within the site, and a defined residential curtilage no larger than the appeal building. The remaining areas of land would be used in connection with agricultural activities. The landscaping and hardstanding areas outside of the revised curtilage are not shown on the amended plan. 8. The hardstanding and landscaping works may not have required planning permission.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision Even so, in the context of the proposal before me, the amendments including to the curtilage would amount to a fundamental change to the scheme which was before the Council, and on which third parties were consulted. 9. The Planning Practice Guidance1 advises that appeals should be determined as if the application had been made to the Secretary of State in the first instance. That said, it makes clear that, in general, appeals are determined on the same basis as the original application. The Inspectorate’s Guidance2 similarly states that the appeal process should not be used to evolve a scheme. Consequently, I will make my decision based on the plans and information as determined by the Council. 10. Based on the original plans, it follows that the proposal does not comply with the requirements of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of the GPDO in respect of curtilage, and so does not constitute permitted development. As such, I could not lawfully grant prior approval. Other Matter 11. Whether the proposal would amount to a conversion is also a matter of dispute. However, as I have found that it does not comply with the description of permitted development, I do not need to consider this issue further.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision The appellant states that the Council did not advise of its concerns prior to determination. However, this does not change my findings above. Conclusion 12. For the reasons given above, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 O Marigold

Babington Stables, Lowerfield Farm, Babington, FROME, BA11 3RP — Somerset Council — O Marigold INSPECTOR 1 Paragraph: 006 Reference ID: 16-006-20140306. 2 Planning Inspectorate ‘Procedural Guide: Planning Appeals – England’. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶10

The proposal does not comply with the GPDO's curtilage requirements, which means it does not constitute permitted development. The inspector considered the original plans and information as determined by the Council, and found that the proposal does not comply with the GPDO's curtilage requirements.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
GPDO Paragraph X of Part 3
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 13 February 2026 under the Open Government Licence.