Case 3373103

Unit 19 Bolney Grange Industrial Park, Bolney, HAYWARDS HEATH, RH17 5PB

Mid Sussex District Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
4 June 2026
Authority
Mid Sussex District Council
Inspector
Woolcock J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Appellant
UK Helix
LPA reference
DM/25/0096
ONS LPA code
E07000228
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
8 October 2025

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs against Mid Sussex District Council was refused. The inspector considered that the council's application of policy was reasonable and that the harm identified could not be overcome by planning conditions.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Unit 19 Bolney Grange Industrial Park, Bolney, HAYWARDS HEATH, RH17 5PB — Mid Sussex District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 19 May 2026 by J Woolcock BNatRes MURP PGDipLaw MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 4th June 2026 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/D3830/W/25/3373103 Unit 19 Bolney Grange Industrial Park, Bolney, Haywards Heath, RH17 5PB • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by UK Helix for a full award of costs against Mid Sussex District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for rear extension to existing industrial unit. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Unit 19 Bolney Grange Industrial Park, Bolney, HAYWARDS HEATH, RH17 5PB — Mid Sussex District Council — Costs Decision In summary, the applicant considers that the Council acted unreasonably because it failed to critically analyse the comments made by West Sussex Lead Local Flood Authority and did not properly assess the proposal against Policy DP41 or consider the imposition of a planning condition to overcome any harm, which prevented development that should have clearly been permitted. The Council considers that the decision notice clearly sets out the reasons for refusal and that these have been substantiated with relevant policies from the Development Plan and West Sussex Lead Local Flood Authority Culvert Policy. 4. For the reasons set out in my appeal decision, I have come to a different judgement about the practicality of ditch maintenance and the application of relevant policy in the specific circumstances that apply in this case. But it was not unreasonable for the Council to exercise its judgement in the way that it did on these matters. Given the Council’s application of policy, it was not unreasonable for the planning authority to conclude that the harm it identified could not be overcome by the imposition of planning conditions. Furthermore, I consider that the Council’s case at appeal did not lack substance.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Unit 19 Bolney Grange Industrial Park, Bolney, HAYWARDS HEATH, RH17 5PB — Mid Sussex District Council — Costs Decision Therefore, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not occurred and an award of costs is not warranted.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 J Woolcock

Unit 19 Bolney Grange Industrial Park, Bolney, HAYWARDS HEATH, RH17 5PB — Mid Sussex District Council — J Woolcock INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Flood risk
For appellant

The appellant considered that the council failed to critically analyse the comments made by West Sussex Lead Local Flood Authority and did not properly assess the proposal against Policy DP41.

Flood risk
Against appellant

The inspector considered that it was not unreasonable for the council to exercise its judgement in the way that it did on these matters.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy DP41
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 June 2026 under the Open Government Licence.