Case 3369033

Lyngs Farm, Nupers Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Essex, RM4 1JR

Epping Forest District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
15 December 2025
Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Inspector
Ellis D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Louca Kousoulou
LPA reference
EPF/0520/25
ONS LPA code
E07000072
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
17 July 2025

Summary AI

The appeal for a change of use of an agricultural building to a dwellinghouse was dismissed due to the proposal conflicting with the original planning permission's condition.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Lyngs Farm, Nupers Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Essex, RM4 1JR — Epping Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 10 September 2025 by D Ellis MPlan MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 15 December 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/J1535/W/25/3369033 Lyngs Farm, Nupers Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Romford, Essex RM4 1JR • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant approval required under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (the GPDO). • The appeal is made by Mr Louca Kousoulou against the decision of Epping Forest District Council. • The application Ref is EPF/0520/25. • The development proposed is change of use of one agricultural building into a dwellinghouse. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters and Main Issue 2. Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of the GPDO permits the change of use of agricultural buildings to dwellings. This is subject to the proposal meeting the requirements as set out in the GPDO. The main issue is therefore whether the proposal would constitute permitted development. Reasons 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Lyngs Farm, Nupers Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Essex, RM4 1JR — Epping Forest District Council — Appeal Decision The appeal site consists of a stable block which was granted planning permission in 20041. Condition 3 of that permission requires that the development not be used for business or commercial activity, and that it only be used in connection with the keeping of horses for private recreational purposes. There is no evidence before me that this condition is no longer in force. 4. The appellant sets out that the building has not been used for business or commercial activity, and that it has been under an agricultural use for the welfare of grazing horses. However, even if the land and building have been used for agricultural purposes for an extended period of time, it is not for me within the remit of this s78 appeal to determine whether an agricultural use of the building is lawful. 5. Article 3(4) of the GPDO states that “Nothing in this Order permits development contrary to any condition imposed by any planning permission granted or deemed to be granted under Part 3 or Part 13 of the Act otherwise than by this Order.” 6.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Lyngs Farm, Nupers Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Essex, RM4 1JR — Epping Forest District Council — Appeal Decision As such, notwithstanding any current use of the building, its proposed use as a residential dwelling under Class Q would be contrary to Condition 3 and, consequently, the proposal would conflict with Article 3(4). It follows that the 1 Planning application ref. EPF/980/04 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Lyngs Farm, Nupers Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Essex, RM4 1JR — Epping Forest District Council — Appeal Decision As such, notwithstanding any current use of the building, its proposed use as a residential dwelling under Class Q would be contrary to Condition 3 and, consequently, the proposal would conflict with Article 3(4). It follows that the 1 Planning application ref. EPF/980/04 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/J1535/W/25/3369033 appeal building cannot benefit from permitted development under the terms set out in Class Q. 7. I therefore conclude that the proposal would not constitute permitted development as set out in the GPDO. As it would not be permitted development, it is not necessary for me to consider the prior approval matters under Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q. Conclusion 8. For these reasons, the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 D Ellis

Lyngs Farm, Nupers Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Essex, RM4 1JR — Epping Forest District Council — D Ellis INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Conditions
Against appellant
¶3

The proposal would be contrary to Condition 3 of the original planning permission, which requires the development not to be used for business or commercial activity.

Conditions
Against appellant
¶5

The proposal would conflict with Article 3(4) of the GPDO, which prohibits development contrary to any condition imposed by a planning permission.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
GPDO Article 3(4)
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 15 December 2025 under the Open Government Licence.