Case 3368690

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN

Swale Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
13 January 2026
Authority
Swale Borough Council
Inspector
Miles H
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Jake Shaw
LPA reference
24/504803/FULL
ONS LPA code
E07000113
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
15 July 2025

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed because the modest harm to the location's accessibility by sustainable transport modes was outweighed by the development's benefits, including its contribution to the undersupply of housing and self-build housing.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 15 October 2025 by H Miles BA (hons), MA, MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13 JANUARY 2026 Appeal Ref: APP/V2255/W/25/3368690 Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent ME9 8NN • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Jake Shaw against the decision of Swale Borough Council. • The application Ref is 24/504803/FULL. • The development proposed is erection of a self-build 2 bed dwelling with associated parking and landscaping. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for erection of a self- build 2 bed dwelling with associated parking and landscaping at Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent ME9 8NN in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/504803/FULL, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule. Preliminary Matters 2. A unilateral undertaking (UU) has been submitted which seeks to secure the property as self-build housing. I will return to this matter later in the decision. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision The description of development is taken from the decision notice and appeal form as it accurately and clearly describes the development proposed. Main Issues 4. The main issues are • Whether the site is a suitable location for housing with particular regard to its accessibility by sustainable transport modes. • The effect of the proposed development on the Medway Estuary and Marshes Special Protection Area (SPA). Reasons Sustainable transport 5. Together policies ST1, ST3 and CP2 of Bearing Fruits 2031, The Swale Borough Local Plan (2017) (LP) set out the settlement strategy for Swale. They seek growth to be focused in existing built up areas with development in the countryside only permitted if it protects the intrinsic value, tranquillity and beauty of the countryside amongst other things, and for development to promote access to sustainable forms of transport. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V2255/W/25/3368690 6. Webbenditch Cottage is located outside the built up area boundaries and in the countryside for the purposes of the development plan. It is on a narrow rural road with no lighting or pavements until it reaches Bobbing Hill, a short distance away. From the corner of Bobbing Hill and Cold Harbour Lane there is a lit pedestrian pavement which leads to the A2, where there are bus stops within a short walk and these provide connections between Chatham and Sittingbourne. From here, there are also pedestrian routes into Sittingbourne, although they cross a busy junction of the A2/A249. From the corner of Bobbing Hill there is also a paved, but partly unlit pedestrian footpath which connects with Sheppey Way where there is a pub, fast food restaurant and convenience store within a petrol station, as well as a school beyond. There are pedestrian refuges to cross Sheppey Way. Also, Newington Train station could be reached by cycle along Bobbing Hill and the A2, and although this is a busy main road the route is direct and mainly lit and therefore it would be suitable for some cyclists. 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision An appeal decision from October 2023 for an annexe at the appeal site (ref: APP/V2255/W/23/3321025) states that accommodation would be heavily dependent on the car. Subsequently, planning permission has been granted for a new dwelling in October 2024 at Pigeon Farm Cottage (LPA ref 24/503217/FULL) which is at the corner of Bobbing Hill and Cold Harbour Lane where the pedestrian footpath ends. The Council determined, from that location, future residents would have reasonable access to a range of facilities and services within a 10 minute walk of the site and would not be solely dependent on the private car. 8. From the appeal site to the corner of Bobbing Hill, occupiers would have to walk along a short, straight, stretch of road with narrow verges but no pavement or streetlighting. This would not be an attractive route for pedestrians when it is dark, or for those with children or mobility issues. Nevertheless, given its character and length, it is likely that some occupiers would take the short walk to access the nearby services and facilities.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Consequently, in this case and based on the evidence before me now, whilst car journeys would be likely to be required for some trips, occupiers would not be solely dependent on private cars. 9. Although there would be an increase in car journeys, the number of movements associated with this two bedroom dwelling would be limited. In these circumstances, there would not be harm to highway safety. 10. There are limitations as to the choice of transport modes for future occupiers and therefore the proposed development would not promote walking, cycling or the use of public transport and would not be in a sustainable location. However, residents would not be wholly dependent on the car and there would be access to some nearby services and facilities by a choice of sustainable transport modes. This would limit the need to travel and minimise any associated effect on the intrinsic value, tranquillity and beauty of the countryside. As such, the harm in this respect would be modest. 11. Consequently, the proposed development would not be a suitable location for housing with particular regard to its accessibility by sustainable transport modes.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, it would conflict with policies ST1, ST3 and CP2 of the LP in this regard, the aims of which are set out above. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, it would conflict with policies ST1, ST3 and CP2 of the LP in this regard, the aims of which are set out above. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V2255/W/25/3368690 Special Protection Area 12. The Medway Estuary and Marshes SPA are designated because of their rare and vulnerable birds and regularly occurring migratory species. Due to the potential for recreational disturbance and without any mitigation in place, in combination with other plans and projects, there would be a likely significant effect on the interest features of the site from the proposed development. 13. The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 require competent authorities before granting consent for a plan or project, to carry out an appropriate assessment (AA) in circumstances where the plan or project is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, alone or in-combination with other plans or projects. I am therefore required to undertake an AA. 14. The Thames, Medway and Swale Estuaries Strategic Access Management and Monitoring (SAMM) Strategy recommends that the pressures from recreational activities can be appropriately mitigated via approaches which include a dog project, wardening and new access infrastructure and parking, amongst other things.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Natural England has been consulted on this specific application and indicated that the SAMM will provide appropriate mitigation. I have taken these comments into account. As such, the mitigation measures proposed within it would be effective in this case. 15. I have clear evidence that a payment towards this strategic scheme has already been made. Consequently, I am satisfied that there would be adequate mitigation for the effect on the SPA and as such, I can be certain that there would be no adverse effect on the integrity of the SPA. 16. The development would therefore be in accordance with policies ST1, DM14 and DM28 of the LP. Together these require that development conserves biodiversity and natural environments with the highest level of protection for internationally designated sites. Albeit the lack of harm in this regard would be a neutral matter in any planning balance. Other Matters 17. The surrounding area is characterised by clusters of built form within the countryside. The proposed development would introduce a new building which would be subordinate to the existing property and set away from the site boundaries.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision The pair of properties would be suitably spacious and appropriate to the existing character and appearance of this area. Any noise associated with a single new dwelling would not significantly differ from the existing residential use. Nevertheless, the lack of harm from these matters does not weigh in favour of the development. 18. A UU has been submitted which seeks to secure that the property would be self- build housing. Given the nature of this requirement, a planning obligation is an appropriate method of securing this type of housing. All persons with a registered interest in the land are now parties to the agreement and therefore it would be enforceable against them. The obligation secures that the development would be in accordance with the definition of self-build housing in the Self Build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015, and first occupation would be by the applicant, with occupation for three years. It does not expressly state that the initial owner must have primary input into its final design and layout. However, it is stated on the self- https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V2255/W/25/3368690 certified proforma, and this is an appeal made by an individual for a single dwelling. Along with the restrictions set out, I am satisfied that, based on the evidence in this case, the proposed property would be suitably secured as self- build housing. The biodiversity net gain condition would also not apply to certain types of self-build and custom build development. 19. The Council cannot demonstrate a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites, and the main parties put to me that there is around a 4 year supply. Evidence has also been submitted by the appellant that there is a shortfall of 134 self-build plots in Swale, and there is little to dispute this figure by the Council. Particularly when considered together, there is a clear shortfall for the type of development proposed. 20. The written ministerial statement entitled ‘Planning Reform: Next Phase’ supports bringing forward small and medium sites and a diverse mix of homes.

Page 4 · Chunk 11 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision The National Planning Policy Framework: draft text for Consultation (2025) provides a list of exceptions to assess development outside settlements including with regard to previously developed land and criteria to be met in situations where there is an evidenced unmet need for development. However, it is in draft and therefore may be subject to change before the final document is published. As such, I afford it limited weight. Nonetheless, the proposed development would provide a new dwelling in this area and would make a contribution towards the undersupply of housing including custom and self-build housing. The development would also be on Brownfield land, albeit outside a settlement. Overall, the appeal scheme makes a valuable positive contribution to these multiple important matters. Planning Balance 21. The Council does not have a five year housing land supply. Consequently, the presumption in favour of sustainable development contained within paragraph 11 d) of the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 (Framework) would be engaged.

Page 4 · Chunk 12 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision This requires that planning permission be granted unless the adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the development, when assessed against the policies within the Framework taken as a whole having particular regard to key policies. 22. The proposed development would provide one new self-build dwelling. This would make a small but positive contribution to the provision of housing, including towards these specific housing requirements, and would be an effective use of land in this regard. Given the shortfall in both these respects, these are important benefits which weigh in favour of the appeal scheme. 23. On the other hand, for the reasons above, harm is identified with respect to the location for housing with particular regard to the accessibility of the development by sustainable transport modes. There is therefore some conflict with the Framework’s aim to direct development to sustainable locations and the relevant local plan policies. However, for the reasons set out above the harm associated with the appeal scheme would be modest. 24.

Page 4 · Chunk 13 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Consequently, overall, the modest adverse impacts of the development would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh its important benefits. As a result, the application of paragraph 11 d) of the Framework indicates that permission should be granted, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole having particular regard to key policies. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Page 4 · Chunk 14 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Consequently, overall, the modest adverse impacts of the development would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh its important benefits. As a result, the application of paragraph 11 d) of the Framework indicates that permission should be granted, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole having particular regard to key policies. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Page 5 · Chunk 15 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V2255/W/25/3368690 Conditions 25. Regard has been had to the planning conditions that have been suggested by the Council and they have been considered against the tests in the Framework and the advice in the Planning Practice Guidance. I have made such amendments as necessary to comply with those documents. 26. The standard implementation condition is attached and in the interests of certainty a condition to define the plans with which the scheme should accord. Details of hard and soft landscaping are required along with their implementation and replacement if needed, in the interests of the character and appearance of the area and biodiversity. The first two parts have been combined for brevity. However, reference to Fig Tree House has been removed as this does not relate to the scheme under consideration. 27. Details of sustainable construction techniques are required to promote water and energy efficiency, and details of ecological enhancements are also needed for biodiversity reasons. The provision and retention of parking spaces is necessary in the interests of highway safety, and cycle parking in the interests of sustainable transport.

Page 5 · Chunk 16 Appeal Decision

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — Appeal Decision A condition to ensure the access adjacent to the highway is made of bound material is also required for highway safety purposes. However, the installation of electric vehicle charge points in new homes is covered by building regulations and as such a condition requiring this provision would not be necessary, and it has not been included. Hours of construction are controlled by other legislation and there is little before me to indicate that there are specific circumstances at this site, which would require further limitations. 28. During the course of this appeal a UU has been submitted which secures the property as self-build housing. This is an appropriate mechanism to ensure the house is built and occupied in this way. Therefore, the suggested condition relating to this matter is not included. Conclusion 29. The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole, but in this case the provisions of the Framework indicate that planning permission should be granted otherwise than in accordance with the development plan. 30. For this reason, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed, subject to conditions.

Page 5 · Chunk 17 H Miles

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — H Miles INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 5

Page 5 · Chunk 18 H Miles

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — H Miles INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 5

Page 6 · Chunk 19 H Miles

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — H Miles Appeal Decision APP/V2255/W/25/3368690 Schedule of Conditions 1) The development to which this permission relates must be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date on which the permission is granted. 2) The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing title numbers: 22_147-PL-11 Site Location Plan, 22_147-PL-13 Proposed Floor Plan and Block Plan, 22_147-PL-14 Proposed East and North Elevations, 22_147-PL-15 Proposed West and South Elevations. 3) No development beyond the construction of foundations shall take place until details of sustainable construction techniques such as water conservation and recycling, renewable energy production including the inclusion of solar thermal or solar photo voltaic installations, and energy efficiency have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be incorporated prior to the first occupation of the development. 4) No development beyond the construction of foundations shall take place until full details of both hard and soft landscape works have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Page 6 · Chunk 20 H Miles

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — H Miles These details shall include boundary treatment and all other means of enclosure, hard surfacing details and materials including pathways, trees, shrubs and other features, planting schedules of plants, noting species (which shall be native species and of a type that will encourage wildlife and biodiversity), plant sizes and numbers where appropriate, and an implementation programme of works. All hard and soft landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details prior to the first occupation of the development or in accordance with the approved implementation programme. 5) Upon completion of the approved landscape works, if any trees or shrubs are removed, dying, severely damaged or becoming seriously diseased within five years of planting, details of the size, species and an implementation programme for replacement trees or shrubs shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Replacement planting shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. 6) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby approved, the vehicle parking spaces as shown on the approved plans shall be provided and permanently retained thereafter.

Page 6 · Chunk 21 H Miles

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — H Miles The parking areas shall be kept available for such use at all times and shall not be used for any other purpose. 7) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby approved, secure and covered cycle parking facilities for a minimum of two bicycles shall be provided and permanently retained as such thereafter. 8) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby approved an ecological enhancement plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The plan shall detail what ecological enhancements will be incorporated in to the site. The ecological enhancement plan shall be carried out prior to the first occupation of the development and the enhancements shall be permanently retained as such thereafter. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 6

Page 7 · Chunk 22 H Miles

Webbenditch Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, Kent, ME9 8NN — Swale Borough Council — H Miles Appeal Decision APP/V2255/W/25/3368690 9) The first 5 metres of the access from the edge of the highway shall be constructed using a bound surface material and shall be permanently retained as such thereafter. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 7

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶10

The development would not promote walking, cycling or the use of public transport and would not be in a sustainable location, but residents would not be wholly dependent on the car and there would be access to some nearby services and facilities by a choice of sustainable transport modes.

Flood risk
Neutral
¶15

The proposed development would not have a significant effect on the Medway Estuary and Marshes Special Protection Area, due to the mitigation measures proposed within the Thames, Medway and Swale Estuaries Strategic Access Management and Monitoring (SAMM) Strategy.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶12

The proposed development would have a likely significant effect on the interest features of the site from the proposed development, but this would be mitigated by the SAMM Strategy.

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶18

The unilateral undertaking (UU) submitted by the appellant secures that the property would be self-build housing, and this is an appropriate mechanism to ensure the house is built and occupied in this way.

Housing land supply
For appellant
¶19

There is a clear shortfall of self-build plots in Swale, and the proposed development would provide a new dwelling in this area and would make a contribution towards the undersupply of housing including custom and self-build housing.

Other
Against appellant
¶4

The proposed development would not promote walking, cycling or the use of public transport and would not be in a sustainable location, but residents would not be wholly dependent on the car and there would be access to some nearby services and facilities by a choice of sustainable transport modes.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
ST1, ST3 and CP2 of Bearing Fruits 2031
Moderate
NPPF 11 d)
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 7 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 13 January 2026 under the Open Government Licence.