Case 3368209

Ice 'n' Spice, 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8DN

London Borough of Harrow — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
27 October 2025
Authority
London Borough of Harrow
Inspector
Harrison F
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
VBL ENTERPRISE LTD
LPA reference
PL/0870/25
ONS LPA code
E09000015
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
27 June 2025

Summary AI

The appeal for a retractable canopy with timber flower bed to front elevation and bi-folding doors was dismissed due to harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposal's design was found to be uncharacteristic and cluttered, conflicting with development plan policies.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Ice 'n' Spice, 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8DN — London Borough of Harrow — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 7 October 2025 by F Harrison BA(Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 27 October 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/M5450/W/25/3368209 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow HA3 8DN • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Lakhani of VBL ENTERPRISE LTD against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Harrow. • The application Ref is PL/0870/25. • The development proposed is the installation of retractable canopy with timber flower bed to front elevation, installation of bi-folding doors on side and front part of new canopy at ground floor level front forecourt to be used for siting of removable tables and removable chairs between the times 09:00 to 21:00. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary matter 2. The appellant indicates they are seeking retrospective permission however I did not observe any development as described above. As such, I have determined this appeal on the basis of the submitted plans. Main Issue 3. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Ice 'n' Spice, 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8DN — London Borough of Harrow — Appeal Decision The appeal site is a mid-terrace property within a parade of commercial premises which at ground floor level have deep forecourts that meet a relatively wide footpath. The area has a mixed-use character with a varied appearance where canopies of varying designs are a feature. Despite the differences in appearance, the similarity in the general scale of the built form creates a sense of balance that contributes positively to the area 5. The proposal is said to replace an outdated and visually tired fabric canopy with a modern canopy supported by an aluminium frame with retractable bi-folding doors with glazed panels attached to the front and side of the frame. It would be set back from the footpath, and the canopy and doors would be retractable. However, the permanent aluminium frame would be a dominant protrusion that would neither reinforce the existing character and appearance of the area or relate positively to the local environment and would not achieve a well-designed place as required by the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Ice 'n' Spice, 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8DN — London Borough of Harrow — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/M5450/W/25/3368209 6. Some of the canopies nearby have permanent elements, including low level and small-scale timber planters and screens. In comparison, the proposal’s permanent aluminium frame would be of a considerable height, drawing the eye. Despite the relatively slimline frame and the use of glazing, the frame’s height and the added bulk of the bi-folding doors would result in an uncharacteristic, cluttered appearance that would unbalance the prevailing character and appearance of the area. While canopies and outdoor seating areas are a feature of the area I did not observe any of the same design as the scheme before me, including the appeal scheme at 36-37 Kenton Park Parade1 which was found to be an acceptable height and does not include an aluminium frame. As such, the visual intrusion of the proposal would be readily apparent in views along Kenton Park Parade and to the occupiers of the dwellings on the opposite side of the road. 7. There are several other examples of canopies elsewhere in the Borough, some of which have a similar design to the appeal scheme. However, the context of these examples differs in both overall appearance, scale and relationship with the street scene.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Ice 'n' Spice, 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8DN — London Borough of Harrow — Appeal Decision Any comparison with other examples, does not therefore, indicate that the form of this proposal would sit comfortably within its setting. In any event, I have come to my own view. 8. For the reasons given, I conclude that the proposal would be unduly harmful to the character and appearance of the area and would be in conflict with Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CS1 of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012) and Policy DM1 of the Harrow Council Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013). These policies include a requirement for development to optimise site capacity through a design led approach that includes positively responding to the existing character of a place and achieving a high standard of design. 9. On the decision notice, the Council also refer to the Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010). However, as this relates to residential development it is not determinative in this appeal. Other Matters 10.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Ice 'n' Spice, 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8DN — London Borough of Harrow — Appeal Decision The purpose and design of the proposal would offer customers with protection from the elements during inclement weather which would lead to clear benefits to this particular business, allowing year-round use of the seating area and supporting economic growth in line with Framework paragraph 85. However, it has not been shown that the appeal scheme is the only way to meet the appellants aims and the precise extent of benefit has not been clearly articulated. This benefit therefore attracts limited weight and is insufficient to outweigh the harm and conflict with the development plan. Conclusion 11. My above findings bring the proposal into conflict with the development plan, read as a whole. There are no material considerations that indicate a decision should be made other than in accordance with it. Therefore, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 F Harrison

Ice 'n' Spice, 30 Kenton Park Parade, Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8DN — London Borough of Harrow — F Harrison INSPECTOR 1 Appeal Ref: APP/M5450/W/23/3333697 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The permanent aluminium frame would be a dominant protrusion that would neither reinforce the existing character and appearance of the area or relate positively to the local environment.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The proposal's visual intrusion would be readily apparent in views along Kenton Park Parade and to the occupiers of the dwellings on the opposite side of the road.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The proposal would be unduly harmful to the character and appearance of the area and would be in conflict with Policy D3 of the London Plan and Policy CS1 of the Harrow Core Strategy.

Other
Neutral
¶10

The benefit of offering customers protection from the elements during inclement weather was limited and insufficient to outweigh the harm and conflict with the development plan.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)
Determinative
Policy CS1 of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012)
Determinative
Policy DM1 of the Harrow Council Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013)
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 27 October 2025 under the Open Government Licence.