34 Mutley Plain, PLYMOUTH, PL4 6LD
Plymouth City Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 8 October 2025
- Authority
- Plymouth City Council
- Inspector
- Oyebade A
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Change of use
- Appellant
- Mr V Singh
- LPA reference
- 25/00541/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E06000026
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 2 July 2025
Summary AI
The appeal for a takeaway in Mutley Plain, Plymouth, was dismissed due to concerns over the health impact on school children. The proposal conflicted with policy DEV6 of the Plymouth and Southwest Devon Joint Local Plan 2014-2034, which aims to protect school children's food environment.
PDF text
34 Mutley Plain, PLYMOUTH, PL4 6LD — Plymouth City Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 22 August 2025 by A Oyebade MSc FCILT an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 8th October 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/N1160/W/25/3368085 34 Mutley Plain, Plymouth PL4 6LD • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr V Singh against the decision of Plymouth City Council. • The application Ref is 25/00541/FUL. • The development proposed is change of use of retail unit (Class E) to restaurant/takeaway (Sui Generis), including installation of rear flue. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the health impact of proliferation of fast-food restaurants in proximity of schools on children. Reasons 3. The appeal building is within a row of 2 and 3 storey mixed-use properties on this side of the road, which comprises a range of shops including cafes and restaurants on the ground floor, plus residential dwellings above. 4.
34 Mutley Plain, PLYMOUTH, PL4 6LD — Plymouth City Council — Appeal Decision Policy DEV6 of the Plymouth and Southwest Devon Joint Local Plan 2014-2034 (Adopted March 2019) states that Plymouth Policy Area will resist proposals to provide hot food takeaways within a 400-metres radius of providers of secondary education, to protect the school’s food environment. It then defines ‘food environment’ as the characteristics of food that is available within a particular locality. 5. The Council officer’s report explains the rationale behind this policy quoting the combined 2021/2022 to 2023/2024 National Child Measurement Programme data, which suggests that childhood obesity is high in the Compton ward where the appeal site lies, with 29.8% of the children who were progressing to secondary schools classed as overweight or obese. The Council also identified 2 schools that are close to the appeal site. 6. Along this road section between the junctions of Mutley Plain with Greenbank Road and Mannamead Road, I have observed much higher number of hot food takeaways than those of varied other retail types. The frequency of these fast-food restaurants makes them particularly noticeable in comparison with other categories of shops. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
34 Mutley Plain, PLYMOUTH, PL4 6LD — Plymouth City Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N1160/W/25/3368085 7. The appellant has stated that the takeaway shop would serve healthy grilled meat, single small size fresh pizza, pasta, baked chips/potatoes, salad and sandwich, with pure fresh ingredients used. However, there is no available nutrition information to confirm that all these foods would be nutritious and effective in curtailing children’s weight and obesity. In addition, there are no mechanisms such as enforceable and reasonable planning conditions or a planning obligation before me, that would control the school children’s choice of foods and associated condiments at the takeaway shop or how many single size pizzas or portions of chips they can buy at any point in time or their rate of visits to the hot food takeaway. 8. I have also considered the appellant’s statement that the takeaway shop would provide both economic and social support to the local community by way of increased employment and assisting vulnerable people. The proposal would make a positive contribution to employment in this area, with related social and economic benefits.
34 Mutley Plain, PLYMOUTH, PL4 6LD — Plymouth City Council — Appeal Decision Nevertheless, I give these benefits a little weight, which would not outweigh the negative effect on the school children’s health of allowing this appeal, 9. Consequently, the development does not accord with Policy DEV6 of the Plymouth and Southwest Devon Joint Local Plan 2014-2034 (Adopted March 2019), as explained above. Conclusion 10. Overall, none of the other considerations material to the proposed development indicate that this appeal decision should be taken otherwise than in accordance with the development plan. Consequently, for the reasons given above, the appeal should be dismissed.
34 Mutley Plain, PLYMOUTH, PL4 6LD — Plymouth City Council — A Oyebade INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶4
The proposed takeaway's proximity to schools and the potential negative impact on children's health breached policy DEV6 of the Plymouth and Southwest Devon Joint Local Plan 2014-2034.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶5
The Council's data on childhood obesity in the Compton ward and the identification of nearby schools supported the Council's decision to reject the proposal.
Character and appearance Neutral ¶3
The proposed takeaway was described as being within a row of mixed-use properties, but this point was not considered crucial in the decision-making process.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| DEV6 |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 October 2025 under the Open Government Licence.