Case 3368031

Caprinos Pizza, 14 North Road, ST. HELENS, WA10 2TL

St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
19 November 2025
Authority
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
Inspector
Unwin N
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor retail and services
Appellant
Caprinos Pizza St Helens
LPA reference
P/2025/0180/FUL
ONS LPA code
E08000013
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
16 July 2025

Summary AI

The Council's application for costs was refused due to a lack of demonstration of unreasonable behaviour. The Inspector considered that the Council's application of policy was correct and that the appellant's concerns were not justified.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Caprinos Pizza, 14 North Road, ST. HELENS, WA10 2TL — St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 16 October 2025 by N Unwin BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 19 November 2025 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/H4315/W/25/3368031 14 North Road, St. Helens WA10 2TL • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr H Thullibelli (Caprinos Pizza St Helens) for a full award of costs against St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of the Council to issue a notice of their decision within the prescribed period on an application for planning permission for the change of use from cafe/hot food takeaway to sui generis (for sale of oven baked foods-pizza) including replacement business signage and repainting shopfront. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Caprinos Pizza, 14 North Road, ST. HELENS, WA10 2TL — St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. Costs may be awarded where a party has behaved unreasonably and the unreasonable behaviour has directly caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. Unreasonable behaviour in the context of an application for an award of costs may be either procedural relating to the process, or substantive relating to the issues arising from the merits of the appeal. 4. Policy LPD10 of the St Helens Borough Local Plan up to 2037 (2022) (the Local Plan) states that permission for a hot food takeaway will only be granted if it would be located outside a 400m exclusion zone measured from the boundary of any primary or secondary school or sixth form college. The policy then makes reference to the exclusion zones within the Supplementary Planning Document Hot Food Takeaways (2011) (the SPD). The hot food takeaway exclusion zone on page 26 of Annexe 1 of the SPD clearly encompasses the appeal site.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Caprinos Pizza, 14 North Road, ST. HELENS, WA10 2TL — St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Whilst the SPD was adopted some time ago, it is referenced by the Local Plan which was adopted in 2022 and it has not been superseded. Therefore, the SPD remains relevant to the determination of the original application and appeal. 5. The appellant contends that the proposed development will not involve frying, include a range of healthy eating options, and only accept customers who are 18 years old or above. Nevertheless, there was no mechanism presented to secure this at application or appeal stage. Further, Policy LPD10 of the Local Plan encompasses all hot food takeaways regardless of the eating options available. As https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Caprinos Pizza, 14 North Road, ST. HELENS, WA10 2TL — St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Whilst the SPD was adopted some time ago, it is referenced by the Local Plan which was adopted in 2022 and it has not been superseded. Therefore, the SPD remains relevant to the determination of the original application and appeal. 5. The appellant contends that the proposed development will not involve frying, include a range of healthy eating options, and only accept customers who are 18 years old or above. Nevertheless, there was no mechanism presented to secure this at application or appeal stage. Further, Policy LPD10 of the Local Plan encompasses all hot food takeaways regardless of the eating options available. As https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Costs Decision

Caprinos Pizza, 14 North Road, ST. HELENS, WA10 2TL — St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/H4315/W/25/3368031 such, I do not consider that the Council have behaved unreasonably in the application of policy. 6. Whilst I sympathise with the appellant’s position that the nature of a retrospective application has lead to worry, uncertainty, cost and time, this is the risk of carrying out development prior to the grant of planning permission and does not justify departure from policy. Conclusion 7. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as defined in the PPG, has not been demonstrated. Accordingly, the application for costs is refused.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 N Unwin

Caprinos Pizza, 14 North Road, ST. HELENS, WA10 2TL — St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — N Unwin INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶4

The Inspector considered that the Council's application of policy was correct, and that the hot food takeaway exclusion zone in the Supplementary Planning Document clearly encompasses the appeal site.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶5

The Inspector noted that the appellant's proposed development would still be subject to policy LPD10, which encompasses all hot food takeaways regardless of the eating options available.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶6

The Inspector sympathised with the appellant's position, but considered that the risk of carrying out development prior to the grant of planning permission does not justify departure from policy.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
LPD10
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 19 November 2025 under the Open Government Licence.