204A Acton Lane, Chiswick, W4 5DL
London Borough of Ealing — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 26 August 2025
- Authority
- London Borough of Ealing
- Inspector
- Robinson N
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Rebecca Diamond
- LPA reference
- 243686FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E09000009
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 18 June 2025
Summary AI
The appeal for a small balcony with a 1.9-metre-high privacy screen to the rear of 204A Acton Lane was dismissed due to the impact on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings.
PDF text
204A Acton Lane, Chiswick, W4 5DL — London Borough of Ealing — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 19 August 2025 by N Robinson BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 26 August 2025 Section 78 Appeal Ref: APP/A5270/W/25/3367626 Development: Small balcony to rear, French doors for access at 204A Acton Lane, Ealing, Chiswick, London W4 5DL Application Ref is 243686FUL Decision- the appeal is dismissed. Reasons Issue – effect on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area 1. The site comprises a mid-terraced property subdivided into flats. The site is located within a row of similar properties. Some buildings in the surrounding area have been extended and altered to the rear elevations, though roof extensions to other properties within the row don’t appear to project beyond the eaves of these buildings. There are limited street scene views of the rear of the building, however it is visible from the rear elevations of neighbouring buildings. 2. The application is for a balcony with a 1.9-metre-high privacy screen to the sides. The balcony would project beyond the eaves of the roof slope.
204A Acton Lane, Chiswick, W4 5DL — London Borough of Ealing — Appeal Decision This projection, in combination with the bulk of the privacy screens, would result in a bulky, discordant feature which would detract from the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings. 3. I note that the proposal would result in improvements to the appellant’s living conditions. However, this modest benefit does not outweigh the harm identified. 4. The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area and thus conflicts with the policies cited in the decision notice. Conclusion 5. The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole and nothing indicates a decision otherwise.
204A Acton Lane, Chiswick, W4 5DL — London Borough of Ealing — N Robinson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Main issues and findings
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶2
The proposal would result in a bulky, discordant feature detracting from the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings.
Living conditions For appellant ¶3
The proposal would improve the appellant's living conditions, but this is outweighed by the harm identified.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| development plan as a whole |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 26 August 2025 under the Open Government Licence.