Case 3367500

Amurfields The Green, Ashbocking, IPSWICH, IP6 9JT

Mid Suffolk District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
9 September 2025
Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Inspector
Phillips A
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Reserved Matters
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Paul Moss
LPA reference
DC/24/04613
ONS LPA code
E07000203
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
4 July 2025

Summary AI

The appeal for a two-dwelling development was dismissed due to harm to the rural character and appearance of the local area, despite the site being outside of the settlement boundary. The proposal would detract from a visual gap between two groups of development within the village, and would not be possible to blend into the countryside setting via landscaping. The inspector concluded that the proposal would not comply with policies SP03 and LP01 of the Local Plan, which seek to control where and the type of new residential development located within the countryside.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Amurfields The Green, Ashbocking, IPSWICH, IP6 9JT — Mid Suffolk District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 26 August 2025 by A Phillips MPlan BA CertHE MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 09 SEPTEMBER 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/W3520/W/25/3367500 Amurfields The Green, Ashbocking, Suffolk IP6 9JT • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Moss against the decision of Mid Suffolk District Council. • The application Ref is DC/24/04613. • The development proposed is erection of two dwellings. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The Council has stated that the third reason for refusal regarding land contamination has now been overcome. With this no longer a point of conflict, I will not deal with this issue as part of my decision. Main Issues 3. The main issues are: • Relevant policies for the location of housing in line with the Council’s spatial strategy. • effect on the character and appearance of the local area. Reasons Character and appearance 4. The site is located on a field between two groups of houses and is outside of the settlement boundary. There is a public footpath that runs adjacent to this field.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Amurfields The Green, Ashbocking, IPSWICH, IP6 9JT — Mid Suffolk District Council — Appeal Decision On the opposite side of the road there is a smaller field, with also visually connected dwelling and barns. The proposal seeks a couple of two storey dwellings on part of the field. 5. The wider field of appeal site and the small field on the opposite side of the road form an important visual gap between the two groups of development within the village. The proposed two dwellings would substantially detract from this break in built form and therefore would harm the overall appearance and character of the countryside. Given the scale and location of the two dwellings it would not be possible to blend this development into the countryside setting via landscaping. 6. I therefore conclude on this issue that the proposal would harm the rural character and appearance of the local area. On this basis the proposal does not comply with Policies SP03, LP01, LP17, LP23 and LP24 of Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Amurfields The Green, Ashbocking, IPSWICH, IP6 9JT — Mid Suffolk District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/W3520/W/25/3367500 Plan – Part 1 November 2023 (Local Plan) that seek to protect the character and appearance of the area and be sensitive to the landscape. 7. Policy LP23 was mentioned in the decision notice. However, from the evidence before me it is not clear why the proposal would not be constructed to minimise the dependence on fossil fuels. Spatial Strategy 8. Policy SP03 of Local Plan allows development outside of settlement boundaries in certain circumstances. One of these being Policy LP01 of the Local Plan, which allows for filling of a small undeveloped plot in an otherwise built up frontage where these is at least 10 dwellings and is not to the detriment of the character and appearance of the countryside. 9. The site forms part of a significant break in development between two separate clusters of dwellings located to the north and southwest of the site. On this basis, the site does not meet the requirement of infilling a small undeveloped plot in an otherwise built up frontage. In addition, as detailed above the proposal would be to the detriment of the character and appearance of the countryside. 10.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Amurfields The Green, Ashbocking, IPSWICH, IP6 9JT — Mid Suffolk District Council — Appeal Decision I therefore conclude on this issue that the proposal would not comply with the spatial strategy of the Local Plan. On this basis the proposal does not comply with Policies LP01 and SP03 of the Local Plan, which seek to control where and the type of new residential development located within the countryside. Other Matters 11. The proposal would lead to limited benefits regarding the economy and socially by providing new homes within the village. In addition, there could be limited environmental benefits via Biodiversity Net Gain. These benefits do not outweigh the harm identified above. Conclusion 12. The proposal conflicts with the development plan and the material considerations do not indicate that the appeal should be decided other than in accordance with it.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 A Phillips

Amurfields The Green, Ashbocking, IPSWICH, IP6 9JT — Mid Suffolk District Council — A Phillips INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶5

The proposed two dwellings would substantially detract from a visual gap between two groups of development within the village, and would not be possible to blend into the countryside setting via landscaping.

Other
Against appellant
¶10

The site does not meet the requirement of infilling a small undeveloped plot in an otherwise built up frontage, and the proposal would be to the detriment of the character and appearance of the countryside.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The proposal would harm the rural character and appearance of the local area, and not comply with policies to protect the character and appearance of the area.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
SP03
Determinative
LP01
Determinative
LP23
Limited
LP24
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 9 September 2025 under the Open Government Licence.