Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ
South Oxfordshire District Council — appeal allowed
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Decision date
- 4 November 2025
- Authority
- South Oxfordshire District Council
- Inspector
- Brennan P
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Change of use
- Appellant
- Mr J Quesnel
- LPA reference
- P24/S3577/N4B
- ONS LPA code
- E07000179
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 4 June 2025
Summary AI
The costs application against South Oxfordshire District Council was successful. The Inspector found that the Council's behaviour was unreasonable, leading to unnecessary expense. This decision was made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Local Government Act 1972.
PDF text
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 23 September 2025 by P Brennan BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 04 November 2025 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/Q3115/W/25/3366845 Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham OX39 4LZ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr J Quesnel for a full award of costs against South Oxfordshire District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of prior approval in respect of transport and highway impact, noise, contamination risk, flooding and locational considerations for the conversion of a disused barn last used for the purposes of agricultural into a dwellinghouse (Class Q(a)) and in relation to design and external appearance of the building (Class Q(b)). Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is allowed in the terms set out below. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses.
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The costs application asserts that the Council has prevented and delayed development which should clearly have been permitted. The applicant asserts that the Council made inaccurate assertions regarding the structural integrity of the building, failed to substantiate its reason for refusal, failed to follow case law, and failed to act in a consistent manner. 4. Prior approval has been previously granted for the conversion of the barn to a dwellinghouse which has subsequently expired without the consent having been implemented. The previous consent was granted without the benefit of a structural report of the building or a detailed description of the proposed works. In all other respects, the proposed development is the same as that previously granted consent. 5. The structural report identified that the three-sided barn is structurally sound and, subject to small areas of repair due to corrosion, would be suitable for conversion.
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision The Council however considered the barn as a skeletal structure akin to that within the Hibbitt and Another v SSCLG (1) and Rushcliffe Borough Council (2) [2016] EWHC 2853 (Admin) judgement. In doing so, the Council then reviewed the works required to create a dwelling and concluded that the extent of work required amounted to a rebuild, in line with the Hibbitt judgement, as they went beyond those that would be reasonably necessary. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision The Council however considered the barn as a skeletal structure akin to that within the Hibbitt and Another v SSCLG (1) and Rushcliffe Borough Council (2) [2016] EWHC 2853 (Admin) judgement. In doing so, the Council then reviewed the works required to create a dwelling and concluded that the extent of work required amounted to a rebuild, in line with the Hibbitt judgement, as they went beyond those that would be reasonably necessary. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/Q3115/W/25/3366845 6. Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q, of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (Class Q) and the PPG permit a wide range of works for the benefit of the conversion of agricultural buildings to dwellings, including the provision of windows, doors and exterior walls. The proposed conversion would not go beyond those set out within Class Q. 7. To use the building as a dwelling, the provision of a floor and, an internal structure to create a first floor is also required. The previous consent proposed a similar layout also requiring internal works for the provision of a first floor and new concrete floor slab. The apparent difference between this proposal and the previous consent is that the works proposed are now detailed and defined. The PPG is clear that internal works are not generally development; that they may be required for the use as a dwelling and can include structural internal works. 8.
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision Neither the PPG nor the Order provides a definition or an interpretation of ‘to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out building operations.’ As such, this is a matter of planning judgement based on matters of fact and degree associated with each application’s individual set of circumstances. 9. Neither the structural report nor the schedule of works is a necessary requirement for the submission and validation of a prior approval application, and these were not requested on the previous proposal. Nonetheless, the Council advised that the application would be refused unless the documents were submitted, as it had insufficient information to make a positive recommendation. 10. The Council was entitled to apply its own judgement to the proposed development and form a different conclusion to that it previously made. However, the circumstances relating to the application would need to be materially different to do so. The structural report and detailed description of the works provided more information. This supporting information indicated that the building remained structurally sound, in line with the previous decision.
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision It also identified that the proposed works had not materially changed from those which were previously deemed acceptable. 11. The detailed description may have outlined works that the Council, in its previous decision, had not previously acknowledged were required but are a necessary part of the proposal. However, the proposed development’s internal layout and external appearance were not materially different to the previous decision. 12. The Council has not prevented or delayed development which should clearly have been permitted as Class Q, and the associated case law, is a matter of judgement based on fact and degree. However, whilst the Council has adequately substantiated its reason for refusal, I find that it has acted unreasonably in failing to act in a consistent manner without a material change in circumstances within which to do so. Neither the structural report nor the detailed works presented evidence, when assessed against the previous consent, that supported a different outcome. In this regard, I find that the appeal could have been avoided. 13. For the reasons given above, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has occurred and a full award of costs is therefore warranted.
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — Costs Decision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2 Costs Decision APP/Q3115/W/25/3366845 Costs Order 14. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that South Oxfordshire District Council shall pay to Mr J Quesnel, the costs of the appeal proceedings described in the heading of this decision; such costs to be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. 15. The applicant is now invited to submit to South Oxfordshire District Council, to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.
Dutch Barn at Manor Farm, Brookstones, Sydenham, Oxfordshire, OX39 4LZ — South Oxfordshire District Council — P Brennan INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶11
The Council was found to have acted unreasonably by failing to act consistently without a material change in circumstances, leading to unnecessary expense and the appeal.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶12
The Inspector found that the Council had not prevented or delayed development that should clearly have been permitted, and that the proposed development's internal layout and external appearance were not materially different to the previous decision.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶12
The Council's failure to act consistently without a material change in circumstances was deemed unreasonable, leading to unnecessary expense and the appeal.
Planning obligations For appellant ¶13
The Inspector found that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense had occurred, and a full award of costs was therefore warranted.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| NPPF 208 |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 November 2025 under the Open Government Licence.