Case 3364043

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP

North Warwickshire Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
2 September 2025
Authority
North Warwickshire Borough Council
Inspector
Boughton A
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Mr A Jennings
LPA reference
PAP/2024/0568
ONS LPA code
E07000218
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
15 April 2025

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed as the proposed development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt due to the loss of openness and the introduction of domestic activity. The inspector found that the exception set out in Paragraph 154(h)(iv) of the Framework was not available as the openness of the Green Belt would not be preserved. Other considerations, including the lack of conflict with parts of the development plan, were not sufficient to outweigh the harms identified.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 20 August 2025 by A. J. Boughton MA (IPSD) Dip. Arch. Dip. (Conservation) RIBA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 02 September 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/R3705/W/25/3364043 Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire B46 2LP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr A Jennings against the decision of North Warwickshire Borough Council. • The application Ref is: PAP/2024/0568. • The development proposed is Change of use of an agricultural building to form 1 no. dwelling with associated off street parking and external amenity space. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matter 2. The plans sought to be approved show the proposed development would require use of land beyond the red line boundary of the land relating to the proposed development. Plan PL5, also confirmed by elevations, show an access door which opens from the side (east) elevation directly onto other land, the status of which appears to be subject to regulatory action and a requirement to restore land to its original condition.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision Although these are matters which are not before me to consider, an approval of such plans could be prejudicial and whilst this part of the proposal may arise from an error or oversight which could have been corrected at the appropriate time, given the significance attached to the effect of the proposed development on openness and the use of other land which might thereby be implied, I do not consider it would be possible to approve the plans submitted in their current form. However, given my overall conclusion on the appeal, this is a matter which is not determinative of my decision. Main Issue 3. The main issue is, firstly, whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the West Midlands Green Belt, and, secondly, if so, whether other considerations exist that clearly outweigh the totality of harms which would arise from the development, including the non-Green Belt harms as to highway safety, access to services for users and harm to the character and appearance of the landscape. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/R3705/W/25/3364043 Reasons Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development 4. The appellant proposes to change the use of an existing building to a single dwelling house. The building, stated to be in agricultural use, sits within a parcel of pastureland at the rear of Brook Farm Cottage and its neighbouring houses which lie within the small settlement of Furnace End. This is washed over by the West Midlands Green Belt, although the application site (other than its access) falls outside the built-up area. 5. Furnace End consists of housing clustered around the crossroad junction of the B4116/B4098 (Atherstone Road and Tamworth Road), containing many houses of a suburban typology in well- defined rectangular plots. These are mixed with typically rural, older, house types in a less regular development pattern. Brook Farm Cottage lies at the northern edge of the settlement where land at its rear is in the ownership of the appellant although the residential curtilage of that dwelling and its neighbours sits within a clearly defined area of built development that is well related to respective road frontages and visually separate from the surrounding open land.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision The north-west quadrant of Furnace End is also enclosed by the tree’d watercourse of the River Bourne running through open land with grassed areas to both sides, and, at the rear of Brook Farm Cottage, a substantial pond or lake which access to the proposed dwelling would cross1. 6. The fundamental aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open; the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and their permanence, consequently development in the Green Belt is by definition harmful and therefore inappropriate. However a permitted building2 such as that which is the subject of appeal would benefit from Paragraph 154 (h) (iv) of the Framework which states that the reuse of a building of permanent and substantial construction would not be inappropriate providing the openness of Green Belt is preserved, and it is to the matter of openness I now turn. 7. The existing building is a brick-built structure of a design which lacks the simplicity and economy of a typical recently-constructed agricultural building, being to a design which is a hybrid of residential and commercial built form.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision It has a sheet metal roof and blank elevations on three sides but an unusual central gable in its principal elevation incorporating an entrance door and upper level window. These are both of domestic scale and appearance and visually obtrusive in an approach view of what is otherwise a predominantly rural setting. 8. Development may have both visual and spatial impacts on the Green Belt. The proposed conversion would introduce additional fenestration to elevations which are currently blank and create a garden area which would project into agricultural land3. I have noted the comments of the appellant and whilst the visual impacts of the existing building have characteristics more associated with residential than agricultural buildings and, notwithstanding the spatial effect of the building as an existing built form within the Green Belt4, these effects would be significantly 1 The bridge or causeway currently exists and provides access to the appeal site and other land. 2 The Council report various matters which suggest breaches of planning control in relation to the permitted use and compliance with approved plans, however such matters are not before me to consider. 3 As confirmed by the Council’s officer report.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision 4 Even if permitted development rights were restricted as the appellant suggests https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision 4 Even if permitted development rights were restricted as the appellant suggests https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/R3705/W/25/3364043 increased by the introduction of domestic activity and its associated paraphernalia, car parking and the associated coming and goings into an area which otherwise would be open land in some form of agricultural or equine use. The result would be an anomalous, if small, extension to the built-up area of Furnace End5. I therefore conclude the effect of the development proposed would be that the openness of the Green Belt would not be preserved such that the exception set out in Paragraph 154 at (h) (iv)6 is not available. I conclude the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt. Other considerations 9. The Council’s reasons for refusal include conflict with Policy LP2 of the North Warwickshire Local Plan 2021 which seeks to direct development to more sustainable locations. In that regard the introduction of one additional dwelling to the existing settlement, despite its lack of facilities and a small degree of conflict with the spatial strategy, would be insufficient to undermine the Council’s spatial strategy. 10. The third reason for refusal refers to the effect of the development on landscape character.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision In that regard whilst it is clear that the Council’s concerns arise from the design of the building and its position, some of that harm arises as a result of permitting a building which lacks the qualities of simplicity and economy usually found in agricultural buildings and exemplified in the examples provided at page 27 of the appellant’s statement. The visual harm I have already identified as to the appearance of the building would conflict with the Development Plan in the way described resulting in detriment to the verdant landscape character which forms the setting of the north-western parts of Furnace End. The proposal would thereby contribute to the overall harms of the development which is currently found. 11. The fourth reason for refusal relates to the safety of the access. As an existing access already in use within an area of 30mph speed restriction my observations of traffic and use of accesses in the settlement indicate that the effect of the proposal in terms of movements arising from one additional dwelling would not present a risk to highway safety. 12. The appellant acknowledges that the benefits of the proposal are limited, relating to the provision of one additional dwelling.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Appeal Decision The lack of conflict with parts of the development plan are of neutral effect such that, overall, these do not amount to the very special circumstances which are required to clearly outweigh the cumulation of harms I have identified to the Green Belt and landscape character. 13. On that basis, for the reasons given and taking all matters raised into account, the appeal cannot succeed.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 Andrew Boughton

Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP — North Warwickshire Borough Council — Andrew Boughton INSPECTOR 5 The Courts have made clear that urban sprawl is not necessarily associated with additions only to large built-up areas 6 The appellant refers to (h) (i) presumably in error as this relates to mineral extraction. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶4

The proposed conversion would result in the loss of openness in the Green Belt, as the existing building has characteristics more associated with residential than agricultural buildings, and the introduction of domestic activity and its associated paraphernalia would create an anomalous extension to the built-up area of Furnace End.

Housing land supply
For appellant
¶9

The introduction of one additional dwelling to the existing settlement would be insufficient to undermine the Council's spatial strategy.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶10

The design of the building and its position would result in some harm to the landscape character, but this harm arises as a result of permitting a building which lacks the qualities of simplicity and economy usually found in agricultural buildings.

Highway safety
For appellant
¶11

The effect of the proposal in terms of movements arising from one additional dwelling would not present a risk to highway safety.

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶12

The benefits of the proposal are limited, relating to the provision of one additional dwelling, and the lack of conflict with parts of the development plan are of neutral effect.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 154(h)(iv)
Unclear
Policy LP2 of the North Warwickshire Local Plan 2021
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 2 September 2025 under the Open Government Licence.