Case 3363307

Land off Icknield Way, Sundon

Central Bedfordshire — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
11 July 2025
Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Inspector
Bowden N
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Constantin Nitii
LPA reference
CB/25/00620/AG
ONS LPA code
E06000056
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
8 April 2025

Summary AI

The appeal against Central Bedfordshire Council's refusal to grant approval for an agricultural storage container was dismissed as the development would not be permitted development due to the land size.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land off Icknield Way, Sundon — Central Bedfordshire — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 8 July 2025 by N Bowden BA(Hons) Dip TP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11th July 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/P0240/W/25/3363307 Land off Icknield Way, Sundon, Luton LU3 3PE • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant approval required under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 6, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). • The appeal is made by Mr Constantin Nitii against the decision of Central Bedfordshire Council. • The application Ref is CB/25/00620/AG. • The development proposed is an agricultural storage container. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The appellant did not use an application form in the original submission but provided sufficient information in a written statement. I have used the description of development given in this statement in the banner heading above. Main Issues 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land off Icknield Way, Sundon — Central Bedfordshire — Appeal Decision The main issue is whether the proposed development would be lawful having regard to the requirements of Class A, Part 6 of Schedule 2 of the of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (the Order) such that it would constitute permitted development. Reasons 4. Under Class A, Part 6 of Schedule 2 of the of the Order, the carrying out on agricultural land comprised in an agricultural unit of 5 hectares or more in area of works for the erection, extension or alteration of a building is permitted development, thus meaning it benefits from deemed planning permission. In this instance, the area of land is approximately 0.5 hectares. Therefore, a new building would not be permitted development and planning permission is required. As the proposed development has failed this test, it is not necessary for me to go on to consider the remaining implications of the proposal. Conclusion 5. For the reasons given above the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 N Bowden

Land off Icknield Way, Sundon — Central Bedfordshire — N Bowden INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Housing land supply
Against appellant
¶4

The development would not be permitted development due to the land size, which must be 5 hectares or more.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 11 July 2025 under the Open Government Licence.