Case 3362504

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB

South Cambridgeshire District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
18 July 2025
Authority
South Cambridgeshire District Council
Inspector
Reed D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
C/O Agent Carter Jonas LLP
LPA reference
24/02706/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000012
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
24 March 2025

Summary AI

The inspector dismissed the appeal, finding that the proposed development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt, causing harm to openness, character and appearance, and possibly great crested newts. The inspector gave limited weight to other considerations, such as providing an additional dwelling and making use of an underused site.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 19 June 2025 by David Reed BSc DipTP DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Decision date: 18 July 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/W0530/W/25/3362504 Land between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford, Cambridgeshire CB22 4PB • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Joe Jackson against the decision of South Cambridgeshire District Council. • The application Ref 24/02706/FUL, dated 16 July 2024, was refused by notice dated 18 September 2024. • The development proposed is a 1.5 storey single dwelling with associated garden space, access, parking and associated infrastructure works. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issues 2.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision The main issues are: • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)1 and development plan policy; • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt; • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; • The effect of the proposal on great crested newts; and • If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it. Reasons Whether inappropriate development 3. The site lies within the Cambridge Green Belt as defined by Policy S/4 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2018 (the SCLP) so the first issue is whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt. In relation to NPPF paragraph 154(e), the appellant argues that the proposal comprises infilling in a village. However, the SCLP defines the development 1 December 2024 version, published after determination of the application but applicable to this appeal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/W0530/W/25/3362504 framework of Whittlesford (and the other villages within the Green Belt) where infilling is permitted in principle, and the appeal site lies well outside it. The development plan defines the extent of the village for the purposes of paragraph 154(e). 4. There is no dispute that the site does not strongly contribute to purposes (a), (b) or (d) in NPPF paragraph 143 and that no policies in footnote 7 provide a strong reason for refusing the development. The site is consequently grey belt land. As a single dwelling, the development would not fundamentally undermine the purposes (taken together) of the remaining Green Belt in South Cambridgeshire, thus criterion (a) of NPPF paragraph 155 is satisfied. 5. Criterion (b), whether there is a demonstrable unmet need for further housing, turns on whether the Council can demonstrate five years supply of deliverable housing sites. In accordance with SCLP Policy S/12, the land supply position is assessed in combination with Cambridge City. Unfortunately, the evidence submitted for the appeal on this point is limited2. 6.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision In the appellant’s statement of case dated March 2025 it was said that the land supply position was at best 4.6 years, however the Council’s statement in April 2025 said the position was 5.1 years. The appellant’s final comments in May 2025 accepted this whilst noting that the figure was extremely marginal. On seeking further clarification, the Council submitted the ‘Greater Cambridge Housing Trajectory and Housing Land Supply Report’ dated April 2025 which claims the five-year supply amounts to 13,383 dwellings against a requirement of 12,122 dwellings, some 5.5 years supply. Disputing this, the appellant argues that the supply has been overstated by about 5,000 dwellings due to the lack of clear evidence that completions would begin on sites that fall within category (b) of the NPPF definition. This would mean a supply of about 8,383 dwellings, or some 3.5 years. 7. However, this is put forward as a simple assertion with no individual sites disputed. In fact, the Council’s lengthy 480-page report includes an exhaustive assessment of likely completions on allocated sites and those with planning permission, supported by the responses to an email questionnaire sent to developers and landowners.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Whilst a full exercise to establish the accurate position seems disproportionate to support the case for a single dwelling in the Green Belt, this would be necessary to undermine the Council’s evidence which otherwise must stand. Neither party submit an up-to-date appeal decision addressing housing land supply which might help. 8. In relation to criterion (c), the appeal site lies about 800 m from the main part of Whittlesford to the south-east, a short walk via a continuous footway. The village offers a range of services and facilities including a primary school, shop, recreation ground, public house and regular bus services with the SCLP defining it as a ‘Group Village’ suitable for limited development. The dwelling would thus be in a sustainable location. Whilst criteria (a) and (c) of NPPF paragraph 155 are met, criterion (b) is not3. 9. For these reasons the proposal does not fall within the provisions of NPPF paragraphs 154 or 155 and would consequently comprise inappropriate development in the Green Belt. This would, by definition, be harmful. 2 The housing delivery test is also relevant but is over 75% for both South Cambridgeshire and Cambridge City.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision 3 As the proposal is a single dwelling criterion (d) is not applicable. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision 3 As the proposal is a single dwelling criterion (d) is not applicable. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2 Appeal Decision APP/W0530/W/25/3362504 Openness 10. Openness is an essential characteristic of the Green Belt and can essentially be regarded as the presence or otherwise of built form. According to the Council, the existing single storey garage on the site has a footprint of about 19.5 sq m whilst that of the proposed dwelling would be about 129 sq m, over six times greater. As a three-bedroom chalet bungalow the increase in built volume on the site would be even more. This would amount to a significant reduction in the openness of the site and constitutes a further element of harm to the Green Belt. Character and appearance 11. The site lies amongst an outlier of scattered built development 800 m or so away from the main built-up part of the village. To the west, beyond the wide side garden of No 14 Middlemoor Road, lie a group of terraced and semi- detached properties and to the east, beyond an undeveloped gap, a pair of semi-detached and a further detached house. Opposite however lie an open grass field and woodland, so the area could be described as semi-rural. 12.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision At present the site is occupied by an old prefabricated single garage with a hardstanding in front, a somewhat isolated and disjointed feature in the street scene. However, the proposed 1.5 storey dwelling presenting a front facing gable with first floor window to the road and with long side elevations would significantly urbanise the site and have a greater visual impact than a smaller bungalow previously proposed4. As the street elevation demonstrates5, the single, relatively narrow but long dwelling between two wide undeveloped gaps and with nearby housing having a more traditional two-storey form, the scheme would appear unduly incongruous in its setting. 13. For these reasons the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area in conflict with SCLP Policies S/7 and HQ/1 which restrict new housing outside development frameworks to protect against gradual encroachment on the edges of villages and require high quality design which makes a positive contribution to its local context. 14.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision The grass field and woodland opposite the site form a small peripheral part of the designated Whittlesford Conservation Area (CA) and Rayners Farmhouse, a Grade II* listed building, lies on the North Road frontage about 100 m away. However, the proposal would have a negligible impact on the setting of the CA when considered as a whole and on that of the farmhouse as it lies out of sight with the road and its boundary hedgerow curving around a slight bend. Ecology 15. The site lies in the amber risk zone for great crested newts which are known to be present in the immediate area. To ensure satisfactory mitigation, the appellant plans to join the district level licensing scheme but the necessary payment certificate has not been submitted to date. Accordingly, at least at present, the proposal conflicts with SCLP Policy NH/4 which seeks to conserve or enhance biodiversity. 4 Reference S/4359/18/FL 5 Drawing no. 220 Job Ref 344 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/W0530/W/25/3362504 Other considerations 16. The proposal would provide an additional dwelling which would make a useful contribution towards local housing needs and offer social and economic benefits for the village. It would also make use of a currently underused site and involve the replacement of the existing slightly run down garage. However, even together, these other considerations can only be given limited weight. Conclusion 17. The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt which is by definition harmful; it would also adversely affect the openness of the Green Belt. The NPPF prescribes that substantial weight should be given to any harm to the Green Belt, and in addition the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area and without mitigation could harm great crested newts. In support of the scheme the other considerations can only be given limited weight. Consequently, in this case other considerations do not clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and the other harm that has been identified, which is the relevant test in paragraph 153 of the NPPF.

Page 4 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, very special circumstances do not exist to justify the proposal and the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 11 David Reed

Land Between 4 and 14 Middlemoor Road, Whittlesford , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire, CB22 4PB — South Cambridgeshire District Council — David Reed INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶3

The site lies within the Cambridge Green Belt and the development would comprise inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Green belt
Against appellant
¶8

The appeal site does not strongly contribute to purposes (a), (b) or (d) in NPPF paragraph 143 and would not fundamentally undermine the purposes (taken together) of the remaining Green Belt in South Cambridgeshire.

Green belt
Against appellant
¶9

The proposal does not fall within the provisions of NPPF paragraphs 154 or 155 and would comprise inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Other
Against appellant
¶10

The increase in built volume on the site would be even more, constituting a significant reduction in the openness of the site and constituting a further element of harm to the Green Belt.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶11-12

The proposed dwelling would significantly urbanise the site and have a greater visual impact than a smaller bungalow previously proposed, appearing unduly incongruous in its setting.

Ecology and biodiversity
Against appellant
¶15

The site lies in the amber risk zone for great crested newts and the necessary payment certificate has not been submitted to date, conflicting with SCLP Policy NH/4 which seeks to conserve or enhance biodiversity.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 154
Substantial
NPPF 155
Substantial
S/4 (South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2018)
Determinative
S/7 (South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2018)
Substantial
HQ/1 (South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2018)
Substantial
NH/4 (South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2018)
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 18 July 2025 under the Open Government Licence.