Case 3362395

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB

Bedford Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
29 May 2025
Authority
Bedford Borough Council
Inspector
Pannell G
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
AMP Clean Energy
LPA reference
24/02430/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000055
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
25 March 2025

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed due to the proposed development's compatibility with the surrounding area's character and appearance, and its contribution to a net zero future. The development would not appear dominant or incongruous, and would be in accordance with local policies.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 7 May 2025 by G Pannell BSc (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 29 May 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/K0235/W/25/3362395 Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by AMP Clean Energy against the decision of Bedford Borough Council. • The application Ref is 24/02430/FUL. • The development proposed is Construction and operation of a micro energy storage project and surrounding fence. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for Construction and operation of a micro energy storage project and surrounding fence at Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/02430/FUL, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area Reasons 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision The appeal site comprises an area of amenity land on the corner of Woodcote Road and Overdale Road which contains a number of trees. Directly adjacent to the appeal site is a block of residential flats, Oakdale Place and the site is separated from this by an existing palisade fence. The area is predominantly residential and urban in character. 4. The notable form and scale of the surrounding development compared to the proposal means that the latter would not appear overly dominant within its surroundings, despite its utilitarian appearance. The form of the nearby buildings and the sites location within the existing trees means that the development would not appear incongruous within its surroundings and being within a built up area, the proposal would not be unduly obtrusive. 5. Whilst the presence of renewable energy structures are not evident, there are a number of other infrastructure related developments within the locality such as broadband boxes and the electricity substation associated with Oakdale Place.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision I am not of the view that the proposed development, comprising a storage facility of approximately 6.05 by 3.9m, with an approximate height of 2.4m, would appear alien in such a context and the proposal would not be overly dominant within wider https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision I am not of the view that the proposed development, comprising a storage facility of approximately 6.05 by 3.9m, with an approximate height of 2.4m, would appear alien in such a context and the proposal would not be overly dominant within wider https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K0235/W/25/3362395 views, noting its location within a group of existing trees, to be considered harmful to the character and appearance of the area. 6. Whilst I accept that the storage facility would be visible through the existing vegetation, especially during winter months, it would not be overly prominent and would be viewed in association with the existing street furniture and the backdrop of the palisade fencing and car park of Oakdale Place. 7. The National Planning Policy Framework at paragraph 161 highlights that the planning system should support the transition to net zero by 2050 whilst improving resilience. The proposal would enable the storage of energy during periods of high renewable generation, enabling it to be exported to the grid when demand is high and renewable power is not otherwise available. This reduces the amount of carbon used, with the proposal expected to save 160 tonnes of carbon each year and 4,800 over the projects lifetime. 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Paragraph 168 sets out that when determining applications for all forms of low carbon energy development and their associated infrastructure, significant weight should be given to the benefits associated with the proposal’s contribution to a net zero future and I have had regard to these benefits of the scheme in my considerations. 9. Therefore, for the reasons given, the proposal would not cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and would accord with policies 28S (i) and (ii); 29(i) and (ii); 30(i) and (ii) and 57(i) of the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030. These policies collectively seek development to contribute positively to the area’s character and identity having regard to the context, visual appearance and landscape character of the area. Conditions 10. The Council has suggested 3 conditions which I have considered against the advice in the Framework and Planning Practice Guidance. As well as the standard implementation condition, I have imposed a condition to ensure that the proposal is carried out in accordance with the approved plans to provide certainty.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision I have also imposed a condition requiring details of any external lighting to be submitted and agreed in order to protect both the character and appearance of the area and to ensure any lighting would not be harmful to the amenity of nearby residents. 11. Given the proximity of the proposed development to the existing trees I have also found it necessary to require the protection of the existing trees during the construction period. Conclusion 12. For the reasons given above the appeal should be allowed.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 G Pannell

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — G Pannell INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 8 G Pannell

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — G Pannell INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2 Appeal Decision APP/K0235/W/25/3362395 Schedule of Conditions 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision. 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos 1A, 2A, 4, 5, 7, P1 Paldin Wood Fencing, P2 Paldin Wood Fencing 3) Details of any lighting shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority before the development hereby permitted is first brought into operational use. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. 4) All the trees shown on the location plan and site layout plan and/or any trees whose canopies overhang the site shall be protected by strong fencing, the location and type to be previously approved in writing by the local planning authority. The fencing shall be erected in accordance with the approved details before any equipment, machinery or materials are brought onto the site for the purposes of the development, and shall be maintained until all equipment, machinery and surplus materials have been removed from the site.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 G Pannell

Land on the North-East side of Woodcote Road, Bedford, MK41 8FB — Bedford Borough Council — G Pannell Nothing shall be stored or placed within any fenced area, and the ground levels within those areas shall not be altered, nor shall any excavation be made. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶3

The proposed development would not appear alien in the context of existing trees and infrastructure, and would not be overly dominant within its surroundings.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶4

The storage facility would not be overly prominent and would be viewed in association with existing street furniture and the backdrop of the palisade fencing and car park of Oakdale Place.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶8

The benefits of the proposal's contribution to a net zero future and its reduction of carbon usage would outweigh any harm to the character and appearance of the area.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 161
Determinative
NPPF 168
Determinative
Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030 28S
Determinative
Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030 29
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 29 May 2025 under the Open Government Licence.