Case 3361930

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD

Somerset Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
7 July 2025
Authority
Somerset Council
Inspector
Butcher C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Jason Cooper
LPA reference
2024/1970/FUL
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
9 April 2025

Summary AI

The appeal for a new dwelling in a residential area was dismissed due to material harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed development would result in a cramped and incongruous addition to the street scene, deterring significantly from the appearance of the immediate area. The benefits of the proposal, including the provision of a single new home in a sustainable location, were found to be outweighed by the adverse impacts.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 12 June 2025 by C Butcher BSc MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 7 July 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/E3335/W/25/3361930 11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a failure to give notice within the prescribed period of a decision on an application for planning permission • The appeal is made by Mr J. Cooper against Somerset Council. • The application Ref is 2024/1970/FUL. • The development proposed is application for planning permission for the erection of a new dwelling (resubmission of 2024/0584/FUL). Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. I have determined this appeal on the basis of the Council’s failure to determine the planning application within the statutory timescale. However, I have had regard to the Council’s appeal statement, in so far that it provides clarity on the reasons why the Council would have refused planning permission had it been able to do so. Main Issues 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision The main issues are: (i) the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area; and (ii) the effect of the proposed parking arrangement on highway safety in Housman Road. Reasons Character and Appearance 4. The appeal site is located in a residential area which is predominantly characterised by the presence of detached homes set within large plots. As such, the area has a highly spacious and verdant feel. The site itself currently forms part of the private garden space of No. 11 Housman Road. The undeveloped nature of the site, and the mature planting within it, contributes strongly to the character of the surroundings. 5. The proposal would involve the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling. When looking at the location plan provided by the appellant, it is abundantly clear just how narrow the plot would be in comparison to others in the vicinity. Therefore, while the dwelling to plot size ratio may be similar to neighbouring properties, it is absolutely inevitable that the proposed home would be seen as a highly cramped, contrived and incongruous addition to the street scene. As such, it would clearly detract significantly from the appearance of the immediate area.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361930 6. Part of the existing hedgerow on the boundary of the site would need to be removed in order to provide an access. This would also result in harm as it would erode the existing verdancy of the area to some extent. 7. There are several fruit trees on the site that would need to be removed to facilitate the development. The appellant’s Arboricultural Impact Assessment (October 2024) also notes that two mature trees located just outside of the appeal site, identified as T4 and T5, would also need to be removed. However, while these trees do contribute to the character of the area, they are not protected and so could be removed by the appellant at any time. Moreover, any harm in this regard is mitigated by the comprehensive planting scheme which would provide 13 new trees, both on the appeal site and within the remaining garden of No. 11. 8. Nevertheless, the proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the area. As such, it would conflict with Policies DP1 and DP7 of the Mendip Local Plan, Part 1 Strategy and Policies, December 2014 (the LP).

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision Taken together, the relevant aspects of these policies seek to ensure that new development is well designed and that it preserves character and appearance. Parking 9. The parking standards set out within the Council’s Parking Strategy, September 2013, identify that the proposed development should provide three off-street parking spaces plus visitor parking. The approved plans show that three spaces would be provided, one of which would be within the proposed garage. However, the garage space would not meet the requirement of being 3 metres by 6 metres in size. The appellant has remedied this situation by providing an updated plan as part of their final comments. This shows a revised internal design for the garage in order to meet the required space standard. Given that this amendment would not result in any external changes, it is appropriate to accept it as part of this appeal. 10. With regards to visitor parking, both parties are agreed that this can be provided on street. Based on what I saw during my site visit, I have no reason to disagree. 11. As such, I conclude that the proposed parking arrangement would not lead to highway safety concerns.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision It would therefore conform with LP Policy DP10, which seeks to ensure that adequate parking provision is made as part of new developments. Other Matters 12. I note that the site is located within the catchment that flows into the Somerset Levels and Moors Ramsar site. However, as I am dismissing the appeal, there is no requirement for me to consider this matter further. Conclusion 13. It is not in dispute that the Council cannot currently demonstrate a 5-year supply of deliverable sites for housing. Indeed, at between 3.3 and 3.76 years, the current shortfall is fairly significant, and I have no evidence before me to suggest that this position is likely to improve in the short-term. As a result of the shortfall, policies related to the location and supply of housing are deemed to be out of date. In such circumstances, Paragraph 11d and footnote 8 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) require that permission should be granted unless any https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361930 adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework as a whole. 14. In this instance, the benefits of the proposal include the provision of a single new home in a sustainable location that would assist in meeting need in the area, support for local facilities, and the creation of jobs during the construction phase. Despite the level of shortfall in housing land supply, which leads me to attribute increased weight to the benefits, I still only afford limited weight to them overall given that they are relatively minor in nature. 15. I have concluded that there would be material harm to the character and appearance of the area. The support for the principle of development within the Framework is countered by the importance it places on the provision of development that preserves character and appearance. In this instance, the harm would be significant and enduring. As a result, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, the adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — Appeal Decision Consequently, for the reasons given, the proposed development conflicts with the development plan as a whole, and there are no other considerations, including the provisions of the Framework, that outweigh the identified harm. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 C Butcher

11 Housman Road, Street, Somerset, BA16 0SD — Somerset Council — C Butcher INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶4

The proposed development would involve the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling, resulting in a highly cramped, contrived and incongruous addition to the street scene, detracting significantly from the appearance of the immediate area.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The removal of part of the existing hedgerow and fruit trees on the site would erode the existing verdancy of the area, causing harm to the character and appearance of the area.

Parking
For appellant
¶9

The proposed parking arrangement would provide three off-street parking spaces, plus visitor parking, and would conform with LP Policy DP10.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶10

The proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the area, conflicting with Policies DP1 and DP7 of the Mendip Local Plan.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
LP Policy DP1
Determinative
LP Policy DP7
Determinative
LP Policy DP10
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 7 July 2025 under the Open Government Licence.