Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — by M Aqbal BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 21 October 2025

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — 8HL. • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a grant of planning permission subject to conditions. • The appeal is made by Mr David Firmin against the decision of Somerset Council. • The application Ref is 20/24/0008. • The application Ref 20/2006/038 was approved on appeal, by decision dated 10 March 2008 subject to conditions. • The development permitted is amendment to wording of condition 06 of permission 20/2005/022 at Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St Mary. • The conditions in dispute are Condition 1 and Condition 7, which state that: Condition 1: The chalets shall be occupied for tourism purposes only and shall not be occupied as a persons sole or main residence. The site operator and owners shall maintenance an up to date register of the names of all owners/occupiers, including their guests of individual chalets on site and of their main home addresses, and shall make this information available at all reasonable times to the local planning authority, and Condition 7: Any holiday let cabin that is unoccupied for more than a 24 month period shall be demolished and/or removed including the removal of any foundations and/or floor slabs.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — 8HL. • The reasons given for Condition 1 and Condition 7 are: Condition 1: None specified. Condition 7: The site lies within open countryside in an attractive rural area where new development is strictly controlled by Taunton Deane Local Plan Policy S7. This permission is only acceptable for holiday use to encourage tourism in the area in compliance with Taunton Deane Local Plan Policy EC24 and the retention of the buildings for other residential uses when the holiday use ceases would be contrary to Taunton Deane Local Plan Policy S7.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 nature of the originally approved development. Background and Main Issues 3. The appeal site forms part of a wider development which was initially for the erection of a number of log cabins for holiday use and through subsequent planning permissions has been extended. Some of the plots have been developed and subsequently varied through planning consents, removing the requirement for them to be used solely for holiday use. Collectively, the wider development is known as Mill Meadow. 4. The appeal before me relates to an existing holiday let within Mill Meadow and is one of six linked appeals relating to sites at Mill Meadow that I am currently determining. 5. The application before me was submitted under S73 to remove disputed condition 1 of planning permission Ref: 20/2006/038 and disputed condition 7 which was carried forward from planning permission Ref 20/2005/022. In short, this would allow the approved building plots to be retained as an open market dwelling instead of one approved only for tourism use. 6.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the In summary, the Council’s first reason for refusal says that the proposed development lies outside the designated settlement boundary, placing it within open countryside and that this location is considered unsustainable, as future residents would be heavily reliant on private motor vehicles. 7. Following the December 2024 revision of the National Planning Policy Framework (‘the Framework’), the Council can no longer demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, which on the evidence available to me is about 3.1 years. Consequently, and although the Council maintains that the site is in an unsustainable location, having regard to paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, it has concluded, that the harm does not clearly outweigh the benefits of a new dwelling. Therefore, the Council is no longer pursuing refusal of the proposal based on its location, provided other outstanding issues are resolved. Even so, because this is largely a matter of planning judgement for the decision maker, this remains a main issue for the purposes of my Decision. 8.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Accordingly, and based on the Council’s reasons for refusal, the main issues are: i) Whether a S73 application can be used to vary conditions on an area which relates to part of a wider application site and whether this would conflict with the original description of development; ii) Whether the removal of disputed Conditions 1 and 7 is acceptable with regard to: • Supporting market housing in the proposed location; and • Affordable housing provision. Reasons The validity of the submitted S73 application. 9. Based on the information available, the current proposal relates to a smaller part of the site as approved under planning permission Ref: 20/2006/038. More precisely, https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Accordingly, and based on the Council’s reasons for refusal, the main issues are: i) Whether a S73 application can be used to vary conditions on an area which relates to part of a wider application site and whether this would conflict with the original description of development; ii) Whether the removal of disputed Conditions 1 and 7 is acceptable with regard to: • Supporting market housing in the proposed location; and • Affordable housing provision. Reasons The validity of the submitted S73 application. 9. Based on the information available, the current proposal relates to a smaller part of the site as approved under planning permission Ref: 20/2006/038. More precisely, https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 it concerns a number of plots that were approved as part of the wider development. I have not been directed to any statutory provision or case law that would prohibit a S73 application from being made in respect of only a part of a site originally granted permission. Indeed, if this appeal succeeds, this will result in a new planning permission that applies specifically to the smaller site area and the identified plot within this. 10. The Planning Practice Guidance (‘PPG’) says that S73 cannot be used to change the description of the development. This is supported by several decisions made by the Court of Appeal Judgments including that of Finney v Welsh Ministers & Ors (Rev 1) [2019] EWCA CIV 1868 (Finney). 11. Planning permission Ref: 20/2005/022, included a condition which says, “the occupation of the holiday accommodation shall be restricted to bona fide holidaymakers for individual periods not exceeding 4 weeks in any total period for 12 weeks”. This condition was replaced through a S73 application ref: 20/2006/038, which was allowed at appeal.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Condition 1 of the appeal permission says: “the chalets shall be occupied for tourism purposes only and shall not be occupied as a person’s sole or main residence…”. This change, as confirmed at paragraph 7 of the appeal decision1, allowed the properties to be occupied as second homes for unlimited period, provided the occupant had a primary residence elsewhere. 12. It follows, from Finney, that where amending a condition would result in a conflict between the new condition and the description of the development, that the particular amendment is beyond the powers under S73 and cannot be made. A fresh planning application is instead required. An amendment can only be made provided the new condition does not fundamentally alter the proposal originally granted permission. As already stated, the planning permission granted under Ref: 20/2005/022, was for the erection of 13 log cabins for holiday lets. 13. As approved, the existing building falls within the C3 use class of the Use Classes Order and is a dwellinghouse, albeit with a condition stating that they should be occupied for tourism/second home use. By removing the occupancy condition the appeal property could be occupied as an unencumbered dwellinghouse.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Notwithstanding this, if the appeal succeeds, there is no planning requirement which would preclude the use of this dwelling as a second home. 14. The term "log cabin" used in the development description on the original permission gives a misleading impression of the nature of the approved building. Based on my observations this is of substantial and permanent construction and this does not affect its suitability for use as an open market dwelling. 15. Given the above, the S73 application does have the ability to amend the disputed conditions for selected plots that formed part of a wider development site. Furthermore, the proposed residential use does not conflict with the approved second home use. Consequently, the proposal can be determined under a S73 application. 1 APP/0315/A/07/2048306 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 Suitability of proposed location 16. There is no dispute between the main parties that the appeal site is outside of settlement boundaries defined under Policy SP1 of the Taunton Deane Core Strategy 2011 – 2028 Development Plan Document, September 2012 (‘CS’). Therefore, the location of the appeal site is treated as countryside for planning policy purposes. Policy KSM9 of the Kingston St Mary Neighbourhood Plan (‘NP’), only supports new build housing within the settlement limits. 17. Policy SB1 of the Taunton Deane Adopted Site Allocations and Development Management Plan (2016) (‘DMP’) says that in order to maintain the quality of the rural environment and ensure a sustainable approach to development, proposals outside of settlement boundaries will be treated as open countryside. It further says that such proposals will be assessed against CS policies CP1, CP8 and DM2 unless it accords with a specific development plan policy. Policy CP8 of the CS, largely relates to environmental matters and is not directly relevant to this main issue. 18.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the CS Policy DM2 specifically supports community uses, business use, holiday and tourism, non-residential agriculture and forestry buildings, replacement dwellings, affordable housing, conversion of existing buildings and essential utilities infrastructure. As a result, and although this Policy does not specifically exclude residential development, this does not offer specific support for the proposal. 19. Policy CP1 of the CS says that development proposals should contribute to a sustainable environment and, among other objectives, minimise the need to travel through strategic locational choices. In support of this, and with regard to accessibility, Policy A5 of the DMP requires that residential developments be situated within walking distance of essential services and facilities. Specifically, acceptable walking distances are defined as up to 400 metres to bus stops and up to 800 metres to local shops. 20. Policies SP1 of the CS, SB1 of the DMP and Policy KSM9 of the NP, appear more restrictive than the Framework, particularly in relation to development outside defined settlements.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Nevertheless, when taken together, these policies form the areas spatial strategy and support key principles such as reducing the need to travel through strategic locational choices, promoting suitable rural uses, and ensuring new residential development is well-connected to essential services and facilities. These aims are consistent with the Framework’s overarching goal of fostering sustainable, inclusive, and well-integrated communities. 21. The village of Kingston St Mary does offer some amenities, including a primary school, village hall, post office, public house and church. While there is a permissive path through “The Spinney” Forest to the northeast of the appeal site towards this village, I do not consider this route suitable for use during inclement weather or for those with mobility issues. A bus stop is located about 300 metres from the entrance to Mill Meadow. Nevertheless, the walk to this bus stop is along a rural lane with limited lighting and pavements and therefore does not appear to be particularly safe for walking. 22. Although the site is located on the designated Taunton Deane Cycle Route, I have limited information regarding the quality of this.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the As such, I cannot be certain that this route is suitable for all cyclists, including the elderly. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the As such, I cannot be certain that this route is suitable for all cyclists, including the elderly. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 23. The appellant advises that the site is within 20 minutes of Taunton by bus. However, the bus service from Kingston St Mary operates only every two hours on weekdays. This level of service is insufficient to support regular, reliable access to employment, education, healthcare, and shopping. Moreover, access to the bus service from the appeal site is via roads, which are largely designed for vehicular traffic. Overall, this route is unattractive and potentially unsafe for pedestrians, further reinforcing car dependency. 24. While the site may be 10 minutes from Taunton by car, this undermines the local and national planning policy aims to reduce reliance on private vehicles. 25. In light of the above, I do not consider the site’s location to be easily accessible and therefore the occupiers of the development would be largely reliant on private vehicles to access day to day services. It follows from this that the site is not suitable for market housing development with regard to the spatial strategy for the area. 26. As previously noted, the existing building at the appeal site has been approved for use as a second home.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the According to the appellant’s submissions, second homeowners often use such properties in a similar fashion to their main residences, albeit in a different location. However, it is important to recognise that permanent residents typically require regular access to essential day-to-day services such as healthcare, employment, education, and local amenities. These needs are generally less frequent or absent in the case of second home occupation. As a result, while the appellant suggests there may be minimal differences in traffic patterns and journey destinations, the nature and frequency of trips associated with permanent residency are likely to be more intensive and service-oriented than those generated by second home use. 27. As such, the proposal is contrary to the requirements of policies CP1, SP1 and DM2 of the CS, policies A5 and SB1 of the DMP, and Policy KSM9 of the NP. Affordable housing 28. Policy CP4 of the CS, seeks to deliver around 4000 new affordable housing units. A target of 25% of new housing should therefore be in the form of affordable units over the Plan Period. Therefore, affordable housing is sought on sites of 5 or more dwellings.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the The Council’s Housing SPD, adopted May 2014 says: Affordable Housing maybe secured via on-site or off-site affordable housing provision, whether provided in-kind or an equivalent financial contribution. 29. Because Mill Meadow was originally granted planning permission for holiday accommodation, this was not subject to affordable housing requirements. As already stated through subsequent planning permissions, several individual units are no longer restricted to holiday use and have been approved for full residential occupation. In this context, the Council considers that the cumulative effect of these permissions alongside other applications and appeals relating to Mill Meadow has resulted in the rural affordable housing threshold being exceeded. In accordance with paragraph 65 of the Framework, policies in designated rural areas may apply a lower threshold of five units or fewer. The Council therefore maintains that the scale of residential development now proposed across Mill Meadow triggers the requirement for an affordable housing contribution. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 5

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 30. In respect of the above, I have been referred to case law2 that provides three criteria to determine and assess the piecemeal development of sites or/and aggregation of sites for the purposes of applying an affordable housing policy threshold. The three criteria include: a. the ownership of the site; b. whether the land could be considered to be a single site for planning purposes; and c. whether the development should be treated as a single development. Whilst these criteria are not determinative, they are useful in forming an overall planning judgement as to whether proposals would be aggregate development or not. 31. With regard to the first criteria, since the original permissions were granted in 2005 and 2006, Mill Meadows has been divided up into individual plots some of which have been constructed and sold. The constructed plots are all in private freehold ownership. I am also advised that the owners of all of the sites for the current applications are different. Fragmentation of legal ownership over time indicates that the original planning unit has evolved into distinct, individually managed plots. 32.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the In terms of the second criteria, the appeal site is considered to be a single site for planning purposes. This is because other than a shared road into Mill Meadow and a management company responsible for maintaining its wider grounds, in general each plot would have its own access and services. 33. With respect of the final criteria, given the above, the current proposal relates to an individual plot. The division of ownership at Mill Meadows occurred well before the introduction of the designated rural area threshold in 2014. In any case, this proposal falls below the present threshold in the development plan and therefore does not trigger affordable housing requirements. 34. Drawing on the above reasons, the original permissions at Mill Meadow are historic and given the changes in plot ownership over time, separate planning units have been created that should not be pooled for the purposes of affordable housing thresholds. As such, affordable housing is not necessary to make the proposal acceptable in planning terms. Therefore, the proposal does not conflict with CS Policy CP4. Other Considerations 35.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Because the Council is currently unable to demonstrate a 5-year supply of housing land, Paragraph 11d) of the Framework is engaged. 36. If the appeal were to succeed the proposal would support the provision of a new dwelling. This would support the governments aims of boosting the supply of homes. Occupiers of the development would support local services and contribute to the economy. As such, there would be some social and economic benefits. Given the small scale of the proposal (1 dwelling). This, and the benefits associated with it attract more than limited weight. Conditions 37. The Planning Practice Guidance states that decision notices granting planning permission under Section 73 of the Act should repeat relevant conditions from the original permission unless those conditions have already been discharged. S73 is drafted broadly and, in addition to reviewing the disputed condition, provides the 2 R (Westminster City Council) v First Secretary of State & Brandlord Limited [2003] JPL 1066 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 6

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 authority to impose new conditions, omit previously imposed ones, or modify existing conditions. 38. The Inspector allowed planning permission Ref 20/2006/038, subject to disputed condition 1 and all the other conditions on permission Ref 20/2005/022, which were still subsisting and capable of taking effect. Because these were not specifically listed in the appeal decision, I have had regard to all these in determining this appeal. 39. As part of the original development has already commenced, it is not necessary to include the standard implementation condition (1) of planning permission Ref: 20/2005/022. However, in the interests of certainty I have specified a new condition identifying a plan showing the site of the development. 40. Since it is unclear whether conditions 2, 4, 5, 10 and 14 of planning permission Ref: 20/2005/022 have been discharged, I have reimposed them for the same reasons as originally stated. If they have already been discharged, this is a matter for the main parties to clarify. I have also restated those undisputed conditions that are still subsisting and capable of taking effect. 41.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Condition 8 of planning permission Ref: 20/2005/022, relates to visibility splays and refers to an unspecified drawing. Therefore, this condition is unenforceable and I have not specified this for the purposes of my Decision. 42. Where necessary and in the interests of clarity and precision, I have altered the conditions to better reflect the relevant guidance. Planning Balance and Conclusion 43. The proposal would introduce an open market dwelling in a location which is not easily accessible and is contrary to the spatial strategy for the area. Therefore, the occupiers of the development would be heavily reliant on private vehicles to access day to day services. That said, when compared to the approved second home use, the extent of this is likely to be modest. As such, any harm resulting from the proposal would be limited. On the other hand, the proposal would provide benefits which are consistent with the Framework and these are afforded more than limited weight. 44. As a result, when assessed against the policies in the Framework, the adverse impacts associated with the proposal (removal of disputed conditions 1 and 7), would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits arising from this.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — on planning permission Ref 20/2005/022, because this more accurately reflects the Consequently, the presumption in favour of sustainable development applies and this indicates that planning permission should be granted, and the appeal is allowed. 45. Accordingly, condition 1 and 7 of planning permission Ref: 20/2006/038 are not necessary.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — M Aqbal INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 7

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — M Aqbal INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 7 Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 Schedule of Conditions 1) This permission relates to the following approved plans and drawings: Location Plan - Plan Reference Number:TQRQM24068154135144, dated 8 March 2024. 2) Before the commencement of any works hereby permitted, details or samples of the materials to be used for all the external surfaces of the building(s) shall be submitted to and be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, and no other materials shall be used without the written consent of the Local Planning Authority. 3) The recommendations of the Flood Risk Assessment received 18th July, 2005 shall be carried out prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority. Any variation of the recommendations implementation shall be agreed and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. 4) (i) Before any part of the permitted development is commenced, a scheme of planting of trees, shrubs and hedges, which shall include details of the species, siting and numbers to be planted, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — M Aqbal (ii) The scheme shall be completely carried out within the first available planting season from the date of commencement of the development, or as otherwise extended with the agreement in writing of the Local Planning Authority. (iii) For a period of five years after the completion of the planting scheme, the trees, shrubs and hedges shall be protected and maintained to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority and any trees, shrubs or hedges that cease to grow shall be replaced by trees, shrubs or hedges of similar size and species, or the appropriate trees, shrubs or hedges as may be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. 5) Before any part of the development hereby permitted is commenced detailed drawings showing which trees are to be retained on the site shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and none of the trees so shown shall be felled, lopped, topped, lifted or disturbed without the prior written consent of the Local Planning Authority. 6) Soakaways shall be constructed in accordance with Building Research Digest 365 (September 1991).

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — M Aqbal 7) Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved details of the western stream bank levels and the emergency spillway construction shall be agreed and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. 8) Badgers are known to be active in the vicinity of the approved development site. All contractors and site personnel shall be briefed on the presence of badgers and the relevant legal protections under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and the Protection of Badgers Act 1992. As a precautionary measure, any open excavations shall be securely covered overnight or fitted with escape ramps to prevent accidental harm to wildlife. 9) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1995 (or any subsequent order amending or revoking and re-enacting that Order) there shall be no addition or extension to https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 8

Heron Lodge, 9 Mill Meadow, Parsonage Lane, Kingston St. Mary, TAUNTON, TA2 8HL — Somerset Council — M Aqbal Appeal Decision APP/E3335/W/25/3361033 the existing building (including the insertion of dormer windows) unless an application for planning permission is first submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. 10) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1995 (or any subsequent order amending or revoking and re-enacting that Order), there shall be no further building, structure or other enclosure constructed or placed on the site unless an application for planning permission is first submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. 11) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1995 (or any subsequent Order amending or revoking and re-enacting that Order), no gate, fence, wall or other means of enclosure shall be erected on the site unless an application for planning permission is first submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 9