Case 3360557

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP

Braintree District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
17 June 2025
Authority
Braintree District Council
Inspector
Price J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Mark Gallagher
LPA reference
24/02475/HH
ONS LPA code
E07000067
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
6 March 2025

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the setting of the Grade II listed Old Applecroft Farmhouse. The inspector considered that the proposal would detract from the farmhouse's setting, which is an aspect of its historic significance.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 5 June 2025 by Jonathan Price BA(Hons) DipTP DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 17 June 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/Z1510/W/25/3360557 Old Applecroft Farm, Great Henny, Essex CO10 7NP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Mark Gallagher against the decision of Braintree District Council. • The application Ref is 24/02475/HH. • The development proposed is the construction of a one and a half storey garage block with ancillary accommodation to the main house, along with all associated site works. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed Old Applecroft Farmhouse. Reasons 3. The proposed garage block will form part of a group of buildings originating from a former farmstead and containing the Grade II listed main house. This is in the process of being remodelled and extended in accordance with an approved scheme, with these works reaching quite an advanced stage.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Appeal Decision This proposal is also based on an approved scheme, the only difference being the replacement of rooflights on the rear roof slope with a box dormer on the front. This continuous box dormer would run directly above the three garage doors fronting onto the site entrance, at the same width and containing nine casement windows. The timber frame of this one and a half storey building is already in place and abuts existing outbuildings forming the eastern side of a courtyard arrangement. These buildings face a curtilage listed cottage to the other side of the entrance into the courtyard complex. This cottage has been the subject of unsympathetic twentieth century changes, like those previously affecting the main house and resolved in the current remodelling works. 4. Entering the site from the narrow country road, the listed farmhouse is set back and to the rear of the smaller, lower height cottage. A visual backstop is provided by the north range barn which is linked to and forms part of the extended main house. This defines the northern side of the courtyard arrangement.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Appeal Decision The historic and architectural significance of the listed farmhouse relates to its evolution from an original sixteenth century timber framed dwelling, later clad with nineteenth century flintwork with gault brick quoins and dressings. This significance also derives from the setting of the main house as part of a courtyard of agricultural buildings and https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Appeal Decision The historic and architectural significance of the listed farmhouse relates to its evolution from an original sixteenth century timber framed dwelling, later clad with nineteenth century flintwork with gault brick quoins and dressings. This significance also derives from the setting of the main house as part of a courtyard of agricultural buildings and https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Z1510/W/25/3360557 where, along with the cottage, the residential architecture stands out within a wider group of farm buildings of a plainer, less domestic appearance. 5. With reference to the appellant’s Heritage Statement1, the originally approved one and a half storey garage block would comprise a sympathetically designed structure, with black weatherboarding and pantiles, which will be on the site of a previous outbuilding and neatly frame the approach to the listed building from the south without dominating it. However, the box dormer facing into the farmyard would comprise a somewhat discordant element, detracting from the otherwise, simple, agricultural character of the building. 6. Like the north range to the main farmhouse, the original approval for a building here preserves a barn-like appearance, with rooflights positioned unobtrusively on the rear elevation. The additional of the box dormer feature would be a retrograde step in this regard, adding a rather incongruous, domesticating feature. This would be at odds with the setting of the farmhouse, whereby its association with plainer, farm buildings forms an aspect of its historic significance as part of a small farmstead. 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Appeal Decision Section 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 applies a statutory duty to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the setting of this listed building. The scheme with the box dormer, prominent at the front of one of the buildings framing the entrance to the farmstead, would detract from this setting. Paragraph 212 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) requires great weight be given to the conservation of a designated heritage asset when considering the impact of a development on its significance. This is irrespective of the harm being less than substantial. In such instances, Framework paragraph 215 advises that this be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal including, where appropriate, securing its optimum viable use. Furthermore, the Courts have held that considerable importance and weight needs to be attached to the desirability of preserving the setting of listed buildings when carrying out such a balancing exercise.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Appeal Decision | Such less than substantial harm would not be justified in the interests of realising | | --- | | the optimum viable use of | tthheis .o Tphtimeruem a rvei anbole p uubselic o bf eOnledf iAtsp palsescorcoifat tFeadr mwihtho uthsee ,p wrohpicohs adlo. eTsh enroetf oderep,e tnhde on balance would weigh against allowing the harm from this proposal to the significance of this listed main house. Conclusion 9. For the reasons explained, the proposal would fail to preserve the setting of the Grade II listed Old Applecroft Farmhouse. It would thus be contrary to the Framework, as well as policies SP7, LPP36, LPP47, LPP52 and LPP57 of the Braintree District Local Plan 2013-2033. Therefore, I conclude that the appeal should not succeed.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 Jonathan Price

Old Applecroft Farm , Great Henny, Sudbury, CO10 7NP — Braintree District Council — Jonathan Price INSPECTOR 1 By Andrew Derrick BA AA Dipl Cons IHBC, Director of the Architectural History Practice. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶5

The proposed garage block with a box dormer would detract from the otherwise simple, agricultural character of the building and add a rather incongruous, domesticating feature.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶6

The addition of the box dormer feature would be a retrograde step, adding a feature that is at odds with the setting of the farmhouse and its association with plainer, farm buildings.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶7

Section 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 applies a statutory duty to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the setting of this listed building, and the proposed development would detract from this setting.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶9

For the reasons explained, the proposal would fail to preserve the setting of the Grade II listed Old Applecroft Farmhouse.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 212
Substantial
NPPF 215
Substantial
SP7
Substantial
LPP36
Substantial
LPP47
Substantial
LPP52
Substantial
LPP57
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 17 June 2025 under the Open Government Licence.