Case 3360269

Land off Hanover Street , Mossley, Ashton-Under-Lyme, OL5 0EZ

Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
11 June 2025
Authority
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Inspector
Fern L
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Andrew Rhodes
LPA reference
23/00497/FUL
ONS LPA code
E08000008
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
28 February 2025

Summary AI

The costs application by Premier Land and Homes Limited against Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council was refused, as the inspector found no unreasonable behaviour by the council that would justify an award of costs. The council's decision not to grant planning permission was deemed reasonable, given the site-specific circumstances and the potential for slope instability.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land off Hanover Street , Mossley, Ashton-Under-Lyme, OL5 0EZ — Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 27 May 2025 by L Fern BA(Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11 JUNE 2025 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/G4240/W/25/3360269 Land off Hanover Street, Mossley, Ashton-Under-Lyme OL5 0EZ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Andrew Rhodes of Premier Land and Homes Limited for a full award of costs against Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council. • The appeal was against the failure of the Council to issue a notice of their decision within the prescribed period on an application for planning permission for 6No. detached dwellings. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land off Hanover Street , Mossley, Ashton-Under-Lyme, OL5 0EZ — Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision This application essentially relies on a case that the Council has not determined similar cases in a consistent manner and has unnecessarily prevented and/or delayed development. 4. It is acknowledged that the appeal proposal is similar to that granted planning permission in 20151, which was subjected to a condition requiring further slope stability assessments to be prepared and submitted for approval, in lieu of providing the information upfront, as has been required by the Council in this case. 5. However, I agree with the Council that issues surrounding land stability should be dealt with early in the planning process and due to the site-specific circumstances of this case, the matter of slope stability sits at the crux of whether this site is suitable for the proposed development. Accordingly, I found conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) as I could not be convinced that the proposed development would not lead to unacceptable levels of slope instability. 6.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land off Hanover Street , Mossley, Ashton-Under-Lyme, OL5 0EZ — Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Furthermore, in coming to their decision, the Council rightly had regard to the evidence submitted by interested parties, their own site visit observations and their own knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the slope stability issues at Mossley Park, although only briefly set out in evidence. I therefore find that the Council had the right to come to an alternative conclusion with regards to this 1 Council Ref 15/00878/FUL for development of 6 No. detached houses. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land off Hanover Street , Mossley, Ashton-Under-Lyme, OL5 0EZ — Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Furthermore, in coming to their decision, the Council rightly had regard to the evidence submitted by interested parties, their own site visit observations and their own knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the slope stability issues at Mossley Park, although only briefly set out in evidence. I therefore find that the Council had the right to come to an alternative conclusion with regards to this 1 Council Ref 15/00878/FUL for development of 6 No. detached houses. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/G4240/W/25/3360269 appeal case given a perceived change in circumstances since the 2015 permission was granted. Conclusion 7. I therefore conclude that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process, as described in the PPG, has not been demonstrated. Therefore, the application for an award of costs is refused.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 L Fern

Land off Hanover Street , Mossley, Ashton-Under-Lyme, OL5 0EZ — Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council — L Fern INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶5

The inspector could not be convinced that the proposed development would not lead to unacceptable levels of slope instability, conflicting with the National Planning Policy Framework.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
National Planning Policy Framework
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 11 June 2025 under the Open Government Licence.