Yew Tree Cottage Eastland Gate, Lovedean, WATERLOOVILLE, Hants, PO8 0SR
East Hampshire District Council — appeal allowed
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Inspector
- Worley E
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Other
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Mr Martin Price
- LPA reference
- 26982/019
- ONS LPA code
- E07000085
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 19 February 2025
Summary AI
The application for costs against East Hampshire District Council was allowed in full due to unreasonable behavior in refusing planning permission. The Council failed to correctly assess the proposal and consider the merits of the case, leading to unnecessary and wasted expense for the applicant.
PDF text
Yew Tree Cottage Eastland Gate, Lovedean, WATERLOOVILLE, Hants, PO8 0SR — East Hampshire District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 10 June 2025 by E Worley BA (Hons) Dip EP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 17 June 2025 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/M1710/W/25/3359798 Yew Tree Cottage Eastland Gate, Lovedean, Waterlooville, Hampshire PO8 0SR • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Martin Price for a full award of costs against East Hampshire District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the change of use of agricultural fields to private equestrian paddocks, creation of associated manege and horse walker without complying with condition 4 attached to panning permission Ref 26982/018, dated 27 June 2024. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs against East Hampshire District Council is allowed in full. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses.
Yew Tree Cottage Eastland Gate, Lovedean, WATERLOOVILLE, Hants, PO8 0SR — East Hampshire District Council — Costs Decision However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The PPG sets out that unreasonable behaviour on the part of a local planning authority may include preventing or delaying development which should clearly be permitted, having regard to its accordance with the development plan, national policy and any other material considerations. The applicant for costs contends that in refusing planning permission the Council failed to correctly assess the proposal having regard to the earlier deemed discharge of the external lighting/floodlighting details, which the appeal proposal did not seek to amend. 4. By determining the application based on a lack of information, the Council failed to consider fully the merits of the proposal and the specific circumstances of the case, having regard to the information previously submitted to discharge the earlier condition. Thus, by failing to take into account matters already the subject of the deemed discharge of the condition, the Council has behaved unreasonably.
Yew Tree Cottage Eastland Gate, Lovedean, WATERLOOVILLE, Hants, PO8 0SR — East Hampshire District Council — Costs Decision This led to the unnecessary and wasted expense on behalf of the applicant in lodging an appeal. A full award of costs is therefore justified. Costs Order 5. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that East Hampshire District Council shall pay to Mr Martin Price, the costs of the appeal https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Yew Tree Cottage Eastland Gate, Lovedean, WATERLOOVILLE, Hants, PO8 0SR — East Hampshire District Council — Costs Decision This led to the unnecessary and wasted expense on behalf of the applicant in lodging an appeal. A full award of costs is therefore justified. Costs Order 5. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that East Hampshire District Council shall pay to Mr Martin Price, the costs of the appeal https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/M1710/W/25/3359798 proceedings described in the heading of this decision; such costs to be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. 6. The applicant is now invited to submit to East Hampshire District Council, to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.
Yew Tree Cottage Eastland Gate, Lovedean, WATERLOOVILLE, Hants, PO8 0SR — East Hampshire District Council — E Worley INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶3
The Council failed to consider the merits of the proposal and the specific circumstances of the case, having regard to the information previously submitted to discharge the earlier condition.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶4
By failing to take into account matters already the subject of the deemed discharge of the condition, the Council has behaved unreasonably.
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 17 June 2025 under the Open Government Licence.