44 Dewsbury Gate Road, DEWSBURY, WF13 4DD
Kirklees Metropolitan Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 8 May 2025
- Authority
- Kirklees Metropolitan Council
- Inspector
- Walker C
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- Mr Abid Shiraz
- LPA reference
- 2024/62/92026/E
- ONS LPA code
- E08000034
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 17 February 2025
Summary AI
The costs application against Kirklees Metropolitan Council was refused due to insufficient evidence of unreasonable behaviour. The Council's refusal of planning permission was deemed fair and reasonable.
PDF text
44 Dewsbury Gate Road, DEWSBURY, WF13 4DD — Kirklees Metropolitan Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 22 April 2025 by C Walker BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 8 May 2025 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/Z4718/W/25/3359558 44 Dewsbury Gate Road, Dewsbury WF13 4DD • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Abid Shiraz for a full award of costs against Kirklees Metropolitan Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of the Council to grant planning permission for a new detached dwelling. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The applicant has submitted a costs application with a brief reference only to a chartered architect’s fee for preparing and submitting the appeal.
44 Dewsbury Gate Road, DEWSBURY, WF13 4DD — Kirklees Metropolitan Council — Costs Decision No evidence has been provided to demonstrate how, either substantively or procedurally, the Council has acted unreasonably to cause the applicant unnecessary expense. 4. Unreasonable behaviour may include preventing or delaying development which should clearly be permitted, having regard to its accordance with the development plan, national policy and other material considerations, acting contrary to, or not following, well-established case law, or not determining similar cases consistently. The reasons for refusal are set out in the officer report and decision notice and they are complete and relevant to the planning application. The reasons for refusal are linked to the policies in the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework. Therefore, the Council has not acted unfairly or unreasonably in refusing planning permission. Conclusion 5. In view of the above, no unreasonable behaviour has been demonstrated. Therefore, an award of costs is not justified against the Council.
44 Dewsbury Gate Road, DEWSBURY, WF13 4DD — Kirklees Metropolitan Council — C Walker INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶3
The applicant failed to provide evidence of unreasonable behaviour by the Council, specifically how they acted unreasonably to cause unnecessary expense.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶4
The Council's reasons for refusal were complete, relevant, and consistent with the development plan and National Planning Policy Framework, demonstrating no unreasonable behaviour.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶5
The lack of unreasonable behaviour justified the refusal of an award of costs against the Council.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| development plan and National Planning Policy Framework |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 May 2025 under the Open Government Licence.