Case 3359131

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS

Birmingham City Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
1 July 2025
Authority
Birmingham City Council
Inspector
Simms S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Krekar Kawani
LPA reference
2024/07309/PA
ONS LPA code
E08000025
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
11 February 2025

Summary AI

The appeal for a change of use from a dwelling house to a small HMO was dismissed due to harm caused to the character and appearance of the area, and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. The development was also found to harm the provision of needed housing types.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 15 April 2025 by S Simms BSc (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 1st July 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/P4605/W/25/3359131 467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham B17 0PS • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Krekar Kawani of KKawani Limited against the decision of Birmingham City Council. • The application ref. is 2024/07309/PA. • The development proposed is a change of use from dwelling house (Use Class C3) to small 4-bed HMO (Use Class C4). Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The description of development on the application form contained narrative that did not comprise development. For clarity and brevity, I have instead used the description on the decision notice, subject to the point below. 3. It is common ground that the change of use has occurred, and I have dealt with the appeal on that basis but removed that part of the description of development on the decision notice as it does not itself comprise development. Main Issues 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision The main issues in this appeal are the effect of the development on the: • character and appearance of the area • effect on the living conditions of neighbours, having particular regard to noise and disturbance • provision of needed housing types Reasons Character and appearance 5. The appeal property is a two-storey four-bedroom mid-terrace Victorian house with loft conversion located in a residential area near to the hospital and university. The short front garden is at a higher level than the street. Access to the front door is via steps and to the rear garden is via a covered and gated alleyway. 6. Larger front gardens that are level with the street have been surfaced, had their front boundary treatments removed and are parked with cars. During my site visit, https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/P4605/W/25/3359131 several gardens were overgrown or had rubbish in them and many wheelie bins were on the street or in gardens, creating an unkempt appearance. 7. The Council has provided evidence that over 28% of properties within 100m of the site are houses in multiple occupation (HMOs). This may explain the pressure on parking and refuse services, albeit industrial action at the time of my visit may account for the more recent domestic waste and bins. 8. The development converts a four-bedroom dwellinghouse to a house in multiple occupation, which is more likely to be occupied at or near capacity and by more than one household. It further intensifies the residential use of an area already subject to such a trend, increases comings-and-goings, decreases permanent population and runs contrary to its single-family household character. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision Consequently, the development harms the residential character of the area, contrary to Policy DM11 of the Development Management in Birmingham Development Plan Document (DPD), which seeks to avoid over-concentrations of HMOs, and Policies PG3, TP27, TP28, TP30 and TP35 of the Birmingham Development Plan, which, amongst other things, require development to be locally sensitive, sustainable, adequately serviced, of appropriate density, and to protect the existing housing stock. I attach significant weight to these conflicts. Living conditions 10. The above-described intensification and its effects, particularly the additional comings-and-goings are likely to lead to increased disturbance to neighbouring occupiers. The appellant does not dispute the Council’s evidence as to the density of HMOs or that a single-family dwellinghouse would be sandwiched by them but argues that the combination of an existing HMO licence and a management plan will minimise disturbance. 11. HMO licences are issued under separate legislation and cannot be relied upon to be renewed or to secure planning objectives.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision Furthermore, as the property could be occupied by several people comprising four households, I am not persuaded that a management plan could adequately mitigate the effects of the resulting variability of activity. Combined with the wider effects of an already-high proportion of HMOs, I consider that this would harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers to an unacceptable degree. 12. This is contrary to Policy DM11 of the Development Management in Birmingham Development Plan Document (DPD), which seeks to avoid dwellinghouses being sandwiched by HMOs, and Policies PG3, TP27, TP28, TP30 and TP35 of the Birmingham Development Plan, which, amongst other things, require development to be locally sensitive, sustainable, adequately serviced, of appropriate density, and to protect the existing housing stock. I attach significant weight to this. Needed housing types 13. The Council has identified a shortfall of 3-bedroom and 4+ bedroom dwellings by reference to its 2022 Housing and Economic Development Needs Assessment and completions data.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision The appellant does not dispute this, but highlights strong demand for shared housing, particularly near the hospital and university, and states that the internal layout is more suitable for shared accommodation. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision The appellant does not dispute this, but highlights strong demand for shared housing, particularly near the hospital and university, and states that the internal layout is more suitable for shared accommodation. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/P4605/W/25/3359131 14. The development converts a larger dwellinghouse into an HMO. I accept that this may satisfy demand for accommodation by students and key workers. However, the focus of policy is on meeting need rather than demand. I find, on balance, that the development would harm the provision of the greater-needed housing type. 15. This would be contrary to Policy DM12 of the Development Management in Birmingham DPD, which allows such conversions only where they do not result in the loss of a use that contributes to the Council’s objectives, strategies and policies; and Policies PG3, TP27, TP28, TP30 and TP35 of the Birmingham Development Plan, which, amongst other things, require development to be locally sensitive, sustainable, adequately serviced, of appropriate density, and to protect the existing housing stock. I attach significant weight to these conflicts with policy. Conclusion 16. For the reasons given above the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 S Simms

467 Harborne Park Road, Birmingham, B17 0PS — Birmingham City Council — S Simms INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The development intensifies the residential use of an area already subject to such a trend, increases comings-and-goings, decreases permanent population and runs contrary to its single-family household character.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶11

The development would lead to increased disturbance to neighbouring occupiers due to the additional comings-and-goings, and a management plan could not adequately mitigate the effects.

Housing land supply
For appellant
¶13

The development converts a larger dwellinghouse into an HMO, which may satisfy demand for accommodation by students and key workers.

Housing land supply
Against appellant
¶14

However, the focus of policy is on meeting need rather than demand, and the development would harm the provision of the greater-needed housing type.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy DM11
Determinative
Policy DM12
Determinative
Policies PG3, TP27, TP28, TP30 and TP35
Significant

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 1 July 2025 under the Open Government Licence.