Case 3358335

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD

Bedford Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
2 June 2025
Authority
Bedford Borough Council
Inspector
Walker C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Wilstead Evangelical Church
LPA reference
24/01124/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000055
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
7 February 2025

Summary AI

The inspector found that the proposed development would result in the loss of a valued community facility and would have a significant adverse effect on the living conditions of existing occupiers, including the loss of privacy and outlook for the occupiers of No. 143 Cotton End Road. The inspector also found that the development would conflict with the development plan taken as a whole, including policies requiring developments to minimise the effects on neighbours and to enable the retention of community facilities.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 6 May 2025 by C Walker BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 02 JUNE 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/K0235/W/25/3358335 Wilstead Evangelical Church, 141 Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford MK45 3DD • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Wilstead Evangelical Church against the decision of Bedford Borough Council. • The application Ref is 24/01124/FUL. • The development proposed is erection of a detached dwelling following the demolition of the existing church building. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The Council’s second reason for refusal indicates harm to ‘existing neighbours’ in a plural sense. However, the committee report, upon which the Council rely, only identifies perceived harm to 143 Cotton End Road. I have proceeded on that basis. 3. The appellant has submitted alternative drawings contained within Appendix 1 of their Statement of Case. The changes relate to the design of the south facing first- floor window. The appellant has not asked for the plans to be substituted.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Rather, they have asked that the revised window be secured by condition should the appeal be allowed. I have dealt with this matter in my reasoning below. However, in the interests of clarity, I have determined the appeal based on the original plans. Main Issues 4. The main issues in determining this appeal are, the effect of the development on: • community facilities within the locality; and • the living conditions of the occupiers of 143 Cotton End Road, with particular regard to privacy and outlook. Reasons Community facilities 5. The appeal site is currently used as a place of worship by the Evangelical Church. The proposal would result in the loss of the existing church in favour of a newly erected dwelling. 6. Policy 99 of the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030 (2020) (Local Plan) permits the loss of community facilities, provided that the facility is surplus to existing and https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K0235/W/25/3358335 future needs, or it is to be relocated and is of a similar scale to the current facility, of an equivalent standard and able to serve the community. 7. Policy CF1 of the Wilshamstead Neighbourhood Plan 2021-2035 (2022) (Neighbourhood Plan) only supports the loss of valued community facilities if it can be clearly demonstrated that its continued use is no longer viable or that appropriate alternative arrangements are more suitable for commercial uses. It goes on to say that this will require evidence that the property has been actively marketed, commensurate with its use, at an open market value for a period of at least 12 months. Amongst the facilities listed specifically in the policy are the 3 village churches. 8. The evidence before me states that the Wilstead Evangelical Church has recently acquired the larger Wilstead Methodist Church that was previously vacant and is a short distance from the appeal site. There is agreement between the main parties that, as the Evangelical Church is due to relocate to an alternative premises which has a greater internal floorspace, it complies with Policy 99 of the Local Plan. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision The dispute lies in respect of Policy CF1 of the Neighbourhood Plan. As the 3 village churches are listed within Policy CF1, and named explicitly within the supporting text, it is clear to me that the Wilstead Evangelical Church does indeed constitute a ‘valued community facility’ and the policy should apply. Moreover, the Neighbourhood Plan is relatively recent, having been found to meet the Basic Conditions and other legal requirements. I therefore attribute it full weight. 10. The policy drafting does not lend itself particularly well when considering a place of worship as it is not necessarily commercial in nature. However, the supporting text explains the policy is intended to retain the community facilities and services to maintain Wilstead as a sustainable village. It goes on to say that demolition of any of the facilities listed which are not for the community, will be resisted unless replacement would prove more suitable for the needs of the community. It also states that the applicant will need to put forward evidence that the existing use is no longer commercially viable and, prove that a genuine attempt has been made to market the enterprise as a going concern for at least a year. 11.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision The policy requires the facility to be actively marketed for disposal commensurate with its use. No evidence of the building having been marketed for disposal is presented. Therefore, based on the evidence before me, I cannot be certain that the continued use of the building is no longer viable as this has not been properly tested. 12. Whilst noting that Wilstead Parish Council and the Local Ward Member support the loss of the church in principle, this appears to be predicated on the Evangelical Church moving to their recently acquired Methodist Church premises, for which I am not aware of any mechanism to secure this. Furthermore, allowing the loss of the facility, risks undermining the views of local residents. They voted by majority in the referendum for the Neighbourhood Plan, for which protection of the 3 churches was part of. Consequently, I give this counter argument limited weight. 13. The appeal proposal would result in the loss of a valued community facility in the locality, without having properly demonstrated with evidence, that its continued use is no longer viable.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision As a more recent and specific policy than Policy 99 of the Local Plan, given the circumstances of this case I attach greater weight to Policy CF1 of the Neighbourhood Plan, with which the appeal conflicts. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision As a more recent and specific policy than Policy 99 of the Local Plan, given the circumstances of this case I attach greater weight to Policy CF1 of the Neighbourhood Plan, with which the appeal conflicts. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K0235/W/25/3358335 Living conditions of occupants of No. 143 Cotton End Road 14. The appeal property, Wilstead Evangelical Church, comprises a modern building located on the northern side of Cotton End Road in Wilstead. This single storey building benefits from a clear glazed window above its main entrance doors allowing light into the open plan congregation space below. It is set further away from the roadside than its immediate residential neighbours at 137 and 143 Cotton End Road, projecting back into the site and sitting just off the northern boundary. 15. No.143 is a two-storey dwelling with a rear outrigger served by west facing windows, a glazed entrance door and patio doors. It is separated from the appeal site by a close boarded timber fence topped with trellis to a height of approximately 1.8m and has a modest patio area immediately west of the two storey-outrigger. At my site visit I observed it provides for a seating and barbeque area. The remainder of its garden and an outbuilding is located to the north, albeit the majority of this is in use as a parking space accessed from its rear. 16. The eaves and ridgeline of the proposed dwelling would be higher than the existing building on site.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision In addition, a first-floor window serving a bedroom would face south. This would afford occupiers a clear view into the courtyard area associated with No. 143 as well as facilitating indirect views into the living space of the dwelling at close range. This first floor window would introduce new overlooking into the neighbours currently private courtyard and habitable rooms from an elevated position that is not currently possible. This would adversely affect their privacy. 17. Support for my findings is set out in the ‘Design Guide: Residential Extensions, New Dwellings and Small Infill Developments’ Supplementary Design Guidance (2000) (SPG). Design Code N5 (Privacy) guides that where a primary window of a habitable room directly overlooks another property or garden, a 9m privacy distance is required. The distance between the first-floor window and the boundary in this case is significantly less than the guidance. 18. The appellant has advanced alternative drawings which they assert would address the harm by angling the first-floor window away from the neighbour. They have asked that I deal with this as a condition.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision I am not satisfied that the alternative plan fully demonstrates that the harm would be sufficiently negated. Furthermore, it would still leave occupiers of No. 143 vulnerable to perceived overlooking at close range. A condition to secure an alternative, more angled window would not be acceptable given that it would create uncertainty for third parties and their ability to properly engage in the planning process. 19. In terms of its relationship with No. 143, the siting of the appeal dwelling would be similar to the existing building, albeit it would also be pulled in slightly from the eastern boundary. The footprint would be smaller and the increased building height is relatively modest. However, taking into account the close proximity of the neighbouring property, even this modest increase in height would be noticeable, materially worsening the outlook for the occupiers of No. 143. Therefore, I find that the proposed dwelling would have a dominating effect on the neighbours, adversely affecting their outlook. 20. For the reasons set out above, the development would result in an adverse effect on the privacy and outlook of the occupiers of No.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision 143 which conflicts with Policy 32 of the Local Plan and BE2 of the Neighbourhood Plan. Amongst other things, https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 3 · Chunk 11 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision 143 which conflicts with Policy 32 of the Local Plan and BE2 of the Neighbourhood Plan. Amongst other things, https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 12 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K0235/W/25/3358335 these policies require developments to minimise the effects on neighbours including from privacy which this scheme fails to achieve. Other Matters 21. As an existing use, and one which the Neighbourhood Plan has sought to actively retain, I do not find that the existing use is non-conforming and therefore give this limited weight. 22. The Council confirm they are unable to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites (5YHLS) in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). The level of shortfall is unknown. 23. An inability to demonstrate a 5YHLS warrants the application of paragraph 11(d) of the Framework which relates to the presumption in favour of sustainable development. In this case it means granting permission unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, having particular regard to key policies for directing development to sustainable locations, making effective use of land, securing well-designed places and providing affordable homes, individually or in combination. 24.

Page 4 · Chunk 13 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Paragraph 88 of the Framework sets out that decisions should enable the retention of community facilities, including places of worship which this scheme would not achieve. Moreover, I have found that the development would have a significant adverse effect on the living conditions of existing occupiers. Paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework requires me to have particular regard to securing well-designed places which includes, at Paragraph 135, a high standard of amenity for existing users, which I have concluded this scheme does not achieve. 25. The scheme would provide housing for a dwelling within a location where occupants would be able to access local services and facilities. This weighs in favour of the scheme. However, weighed against the benefits of a scheme for just one dwelling, I find the adverse effects to significantly and demonstrably outweigh these, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole. As a result, the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply. Conclusion 26. The proposal would conflict with the development plan taken as a whole.

Page 4 · Chunk 14 Appeal Decision

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision There are no material considerations of sufficient weight, including the approach of the Framework in regard to housing supply, that would indicate a decision other than in accordance with the development plan. Therefore, for the reasons given above, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 15 C Walker

141 Wilstead Evangelical Church, Cotton End Road, Wilstead, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 3DD — Bedford Borough Council — C Walker INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Other
Against appellant
¶10

The inspector found that the proposed development would result in the loss of a valued community facility, but the appellant failed to demonstrate that the continued use of the building was no longer viable. The inspector also gave more weight to the Neighbourhood Plan, which requires evidence of the property being actively marketed for disposal before the facility can be lost.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶20

The inspector found that the proposed development would have a significant adverse effect on the living conditions of existing occupiers, including the loss of privacy and outlook for the occupiers of No. 143 Cotton End Road.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy 99 of the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030 (2020)
Limited
Policy CF1 of the Wilshamstead Neighbourhood Plan 2021-2035 (2022)
Determinative
Policy 32 of the Local Plan
Moderate
BE2 of the Neighbourhood Plan
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 2 June 2025 under the Open Government Licence.