Case 3356130

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX

London Borough of Barnet — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
1 May 2025
Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Inspector
Tinsley F
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Samia Mazhary
LPA reference
24/1067/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000003
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
13 December 2024

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the character and appearance of the area, which would be harmed by the extension beyond the established building line and the creation of a cramped appearance. The inspector found that the design and layout of the proposed development would not be sympathetic to local character, and would fail to secure a well-designed place contrary to paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 24 March 2025 by F P Tinsley MA (Hons) MBA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 1st May 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/N5090/W/24/3356130 51 Fernside Avenue, Mill Hill, Barnet, LONDON NW7 3AX. • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Samia Mazhary, against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Barnet. • The application reference number is: 24/1067/FUL. • The development proposed is described as ‘new 2 storey dwelling proposed which would be attached to the north elevation of the host building following demolition of the existing garage’. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The Council of the London Borough of Barnet adopted a new Local Plan on 4 March 2025. The Council has confirmed that the policies from Barnet’s Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (September 2012) and Barnet’s Local Plan (Development Management Policies) Development Plan Document (September 2012) referred to in the Decision Notice have been superseded by policies from the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036 (March 2025) (the Local Plan).

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision The main parties to this appeal were provided with the opportunity to comment on the new Local Plan as part of the appeal process. 3. Appeal decisions must be based on the policies from the development plan prevailing at the time of determination. Policies referred to in the reason for refusal, relating to the planning application subject to this appeal from the Barnet Local Plan 2012, are no longer in force. The corresponding policies in the Local Plan are Policies GSS01, CDH01 and HOU03. Main Issue 4. The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons Character & Appearance 5. The appeal site is located in a suburban area predominantly characterized by two- storey semi-detached houses surrounded by ample gardens and open spaces. Other types of dwellings, such as flats, are present, but they are designed as small blocks that mimic the appearance of large semi-detached houses and are similarly set back from the street and junctions. Trees lining the footpaths soften the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/24/3356130 relatively uniform built form of the dwellings in the street scene. Junctions between residential streets are typically open and dwellings are set back from the property boundary with the highway (footpath) to the side. This supports a sense of spaciousness and greenery underpinned by the deliberate ordered pattern of development. Overall, these factors result in a pleasant residential character and appearance. 6. The host dwelling no.51 reflects and typifies these factors and therefore, presently makes a positive contribution towards the character and appearance of the area at a prominent corner point with Westmere Drive 7. The proposal involves alterations to an existing two-storey dwelling and the construction of a new attached two-storey dwelling on land currently partially occupied by a garage serving the original house. The proposed development would extend the block of two semi-detached houses, including their elevations and roofline, toward Westmere Drive, which runs broadly perpendicular to Fernside Avenue, engaging a similar design approach. 8. The siting of the proposed dwelling would harmfully undermine the established pattern of development.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Although it would align with the building line of existing houses on Fernside Avenue, it would significantly extend laterally beyond the front building line of properties on Westmere Drive which are set back a considerable distance from the highway. 9. The appellant has pointed out that the building at 53–55 Fernside Avenue also extends beyond the established building line of Westmere Drive on the opposite side of the street junction from the appeal site. Nevertheless, the projection forward of the building line in that instance is less pronounced than in the appeal proposals. The building at 53–55 Fernside Avenue maintains an approximate two-metre setback from the property boundary, whereas the appeal proposals would see construction directly up to the property boundary (footpath) with Westmere Drive. 10. Furthermore, the existing projection forward of the building line at 53–55 Fernside Avenue, combined with the proposed projection at the appeal site, would result in a sense of enclosure at the junction, giving it a more urban rather than suburban character.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Such a configuration would starkly contrast with the spaciousness of street junctions prevalent in the surrounding area and would be out of keeping with, and detrimental to, the overall character and appearance of the locality. 11. In addition, the proposal would result in three dwellings being joined together as a single block. This represents a notable departure from the prevailing form of development, which is characterized by pairs of semi-detached properties or small blocks of flats mimicking this form. Even if suitable external materials were employed, the resulting scale and massing of this small, terraced block would appear somewhat incongruous within the surrounding context and would fail to align with the existing character and appearance of the area. 12. The triangular shape of the plot proposed for the new dwelling would result in a highly constrained frontage along Fernside Avenue. The tapering nature of the plot would mean that the frontage along the footpath would be significantly narrower than the frontage of the proposed dwelling at the building line.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision This would create a cramped appearance that contrasts sharply with the prevailing character of the area, where properties are generally fronted by spacious gardens or driveways. Amenity space to the rear of the dwelling would not mitigate the impact of the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision This would create a cramped appearance that contrasts sharply with the prevailing character of the area, where properties are generally fronted by spacious gardens or driveways. Amenity space to the rear of the dwelling would not mitigate the impact of the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/24/3356130 visually cramped area to the front at the most public point. The proposed development would therefore appear incongruous and cramped in a context where spaciousness is a defining feature of the area surrounding dwellings. 13. I have had regard to the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) and Sustainable Design and Construction SPD (2016), although their weight is diminished in the context of the adoption of the new Local Plan and the stated intention to prepare a new Sustainable Design & Development SPD. The guidance was largely generic and has had a limited bearing on my specific assessment of the merits of this case. 14. My attention has been drawn to an appeal decision for a proposal under Ref: APP/N5090/W/24/3345138. From the information provided, it does not appear to be directly comparable to the current appeal, given differences in the location and scale of the site, the number of units provided and the policies in place at the time of the decision. I have determined the current appeal based on the site-specific circumstances of this case and therefore, the findings of the Inspector in that case have little relevance. 15.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Overall, I find that the design and layout of the proposed development would not be sympathetic to local character, for the reasons outlined above. As such it would fail to secure a well-designed place contrary to paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). 16. For the reasons given, the proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area. There is conflict with Policies GSS01, CDH01 and HOU03 of the Local Plan insofar as they require development to respond sensitively to the distinctive local character and design, building form and patterns of development. Other Matters 17. Paragraph 78 of the Framework states that local planning authorities should identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide a minimum of five years’ worth of housing, against either the housing requirement set out in adopted strategic policies, or against their local housing need where the strategic policies are more than five years old. The Council have confirmed via a recently adopted local plan that they are able to demonstrate 5.09 years supply of deliverable housing sites including a 5% buffer.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision I have not seen substantive evidence to undermine that position nor that the balance in paragraph 11dii applies in this instance for any other reason. 18. The proposal would deliver one additional dwelling unit in a reasonably accessible location, contributing to Barnet’s housing supply and supporting the Government’s objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes. It would also make more efficient use of the land which is supported in local and national planning policies.. There would likely be a limited contribution towards the local economy by providing construction jobs and by supporting local services and facilities. Given the limited extent of such benefits derived from a single dwelling, they carry moderate weight in favour which would be insufficient to outweigh the harm identified. 19. I do not dispute that the proposed development would offer acceptable living conditions for future occupiers. Additionally, I acknowledge that several local residents have expressed support for the scheme. However, these considerations do not constitute benefits that weigh in favour of the development. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/24/3356130 Conclusion 20. For the reasons given above, I conclude that the proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole and there are no material considerations that indicate that the development should be determined otherwise than in accordance with it. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 11 F P Tinsley

51 Fernside Avenue, LONDON, NW7 3AX — London Borough of Barnet — F P Tinsley INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶5

The appeal site is located in a suburban area predominantly characterized by two-storey semi-detached houses surrounded by ample gardens and open spaces.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The host dwelling no.51 reflects and typifies these factors and therefore, presently makes a positive contribution towards the character and appearance of the area at a prominent corner point with Westmere Drive

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶10

The existing projection forward of the building line at 53–55 Fernside Avenue, combined with the proposed projection at the appeal site, would result in a sense of enclosure at the junction, giving it a more urban rather than suburban character.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶11

The proposal would result in three dwellings being joined together as a single block, which represents a notable departure from the prevailing form of development.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶12

The triangular shape of the plot proposed for the new dwelling would result in a highly constrained frontage along Fernside Avenue.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶13

The proposed development would appear incongruous and cramped in a context where spaciousness is a defining feature of the area surrounding dwellings.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶15

The design and layout of the proposed development would not be sympathetic to local character.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶16

The proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶null

The inspector found that the proposed development would conflict with Policies GSS01, CDH01 and HOU03 of the Local Plan insofar as they require development to respond sensitively to the distinctive local character and design.

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶18

The proposal would deliver one additional dwelling unit in a reasonably accessible location, contributing to Barnet’s housing supply and supporting the Government’s objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes.

Living conditions
Neutral
¶19

The proposed development would offer acceptable living conditions for future occupiers.

Other
Neutral
¶14

An appeal decision for a proposal under Ref: APP/N5090/W/24/3345138 was considered, but found to be directly comparable to the current appeal.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policies GSS01, CDH01 and HOU03 of the Local Plan
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 1 May 2025 under the Open Government Licence.