Case 3355704

38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT

Southend-on-Sea City Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
21 May 2025
Authority
Southend-on-Sea City Council
Inspector
Grierson E
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Mitch Nunn
LPA reference
24/00985/AMDT
ONS LPA code
E06000033
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
28 November 2024

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed variation to condition 7 being incompatible with the original planning permission.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by E Grierson BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI

38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — by E Grierson BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 21 May 2025

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Lynton House, 38 Kilworth Avenue, Southend-on-Sea SS1 2DT

38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — Lynton House, 38 Kilworth Avenue, Southend-on-Sea SS1 2DT • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Mr M Nunn against the decision of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council. • The application Ref is 24/00985/AMDT. • The application sought planning permission for a change of use from 6-person HMO (class C4) to 8- bedroom HMO (sui generis), infill window at ground floor level on side elevation and provide associated bin and cycle stores at rear without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 24/00441/FUL, dated 29 May 2024.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Lynton House, 38 Kilworth Avenue, Southend-on-Sea SS1 2DT

38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — Lynton House, 38 Kilworth Avenue, Southend-on-Sea SS1 2DT • The condition in dispute is No 7 which states that: Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) the development and use of the building as a House in Multiple Occupation subject of this permission shall not at any time be adapted to enable formation of more than eight (8) bedrooms and the property shall not be occupied by more than eight (8) residents at any one time with all eight (8) bedrooms for single occupancy only. • The reason given for the condition is: To ensure the use hereby approved accords with the development sought and so that it would offer acceptable living conditions for its occupiers in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Core Strategy (2007) Policies KP2 and CP4 and Development Management Document (2015) Policies DM1, DM3 and DM8.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made and a

38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made and a https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made and a

38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made and a https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/D1590/W/24/3355704 fresh planning application would be required. The consequence to this is that an amendment can only be made providing the new condition does not fundamentally alter the original planning proposal for which permission had been granted. 5. Applying these principles to the current appeal, planning permission was originally granted for a change of use from a 6-person HMO (class C4) to an 8-bedroom HMO (sui generis). Based on the submitted plans, and as a matter of fact, the proposed variation to condition 7 would result in a 10-bedroom HMO. Regardless of whether the original permission has been implemented, this variation would be incompatible with the description of development on the original decision notice, which cannot be varied using the mechanism of section 73. Conclusion 6. I have concluded that I cannot proceed to consider this appeal as it would be beyond my powers to do so under section 73 and on this basis, this appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 E Grierson

38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — E Grierson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Conditions
Against appellant
¶2

The proposed variation to condition 7 would result in a 10-bedroom HMO, which is incompatible with the original description of development.

Conditions
Against appellant
¶3

The Court of Appeal held in the case of John Leslie Finney v Welsh Ministers & Carmarthenshire County Council that an application under section 73 may not be used to obtain a permission that would require a variation to the terms of the 'operative' part of the planning permission.

Conditions
Against appellant
¶5

The proposed variation would result in a 10-bedroom HMO, which is incompatible with the description of development on the original decision notice.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Core Strategy (2007) Policies KP2 and CP4 and Development Management Document
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 21 May 2025 under the Open Government Licence.