38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT
Southend-on-Sea City Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 21 May 2025
- Authority
- Southend-on-Sea City Council
- Inspector
- Grierson E
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Other
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Mr Mitch Nunn
- LPA reference
- 24/00985/AMDT
- ONS LPA code
- E06000033
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 28 November 2024
Summary AI
The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed variation to condition 7 being incompatible with the original planning permission.
PDF text
38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — by E Grierson BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 21 May 2025
38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — Lynton House, 38 Kilworth Avenue, Southend-on-Sea SS1 2DT • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Mr M Nunn against the decision of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council. • The application Ref is 24/00985/AMDT. • The application sought planning permission for a change of use from 6-person HMO (class C4) to 8- bedroom HMO (sui generis), infill window at ground floor level on side elevation and provide associated bin and cycle stores at rear without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 24/00441/FUL, dated 29 May 2024.
38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — Lynton House, 38 Kilworth Avenue, Southend-on-Sea SS1 2DT • The condition in dispute is No 7 which states that: Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) the development and use of the building as a House in Multiple Occupation subject of this permission shall not at any time be adapted to enable formation of more than eight (8) bedrooms and the property shall not be occupied by more than eight (8) residents at any one time with all eight (8) bedrooms for single occupancy only. • The reason given for the condition is: To ensure the use hereby approved accords with the development sought and so that it would offer acceptable living conditions for its occupiers in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Core Strategy (2007) Policies KP2 and CP4 and Development Management Document (2015) Policies DM1, DM3 and DM8.
38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made and a https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made and a https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/D1590/W/24/3355704 fresh planning application would be required. The consequence to this is that an amendment can only be made providing the new condition does not fundamentally alter the original planning proposal for which permission had been granted. 5. Applying these principles to the current appeal, planning permission was originally granted for a change of use from a 6-person HMO (class C4) to an 8-bedroom HMO (sui generis). Based on the submitted plans, and as a matter of fact, the proposed variation to condition 7 would result in a 10-bedroom HMO. Regardless of whether the original permission has been implemented, this variation would be incompatible with the description of development on the original decision notice, which cannot be varied using the mechanism of section 73. Conclusion 6. I have concluded that I cannot proceed to consider this appeal as it would be beyond my powers to do so under section 73 and on this basis, this appeal should be dismissed.
38 Kilworth Avenue, SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, SS1 2DT — Southend-on-Sea City Council — E Grierson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Conditions Against appellant ¶2
The proposed variation to condition 7 would result in a 10-bedroom HMO, which is incompatible with the original description of development.
Conditions Against appellant ¶3
The Court of Appeal held in the case of John Leslie Finney v Welsh Ministers & Carmarthenshire County Council that an application under section 73 may not be used to obtain a permission that would require a variation to the terms of the 'operative' part of the planning permission.
Conditions Against appellant ¶5
The proposed variation would result in a 10-bedroom HMO, which is incompatible with the description of development on the original decision notice.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Core Strategy (2007) Policies KP2 and CP4 and Development Management Document |
Moderate |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 21 May 2025 under the Open Government Licence.