Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham, CB7 5LX
East Cambridgeshire District Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Authority
- East Cambridgeshire District Council
- Inspector
- Simms S
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Mr Alan Nash
- LPA reference
- 24/00441/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E07000009
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 27 November 2024
Summary AI
The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the character and appearance of the area, contravening local plan policies.
PDF text
Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham, CB7 5LX — East Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 4 March 2025 by S Simms BSc (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 27 March 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/V0510/W/24/3355673 Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham CB7 5LX • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Alan Nash against the decision of East Cambridgeshire District Council. • The application Ref is 24/00441/FUL. • The development proposed is a 5 bar timber entrance gate and associated walls. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. It was evident at the site visit that walls and gates have already been installed, which would appear to be different to those shown on the proposed drawings. In any event, this decision is based on the proposed drawings and description of development for which the appellant applied. Main Issue 3. The effect of the walls and gates on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 4. The site is the entrance to a recent development of bungalows on Fordham Moor, a narrow lane that leads from the village of Fordham into open fields immediately beyond the site.
Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham, CB7 5LX — East Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision The walls are in flint render with brickwork quoins and copings, like those of houses further along the lane and elsewhere within the village. The gates presently on site appear to be of powder coated metal and have thick posts containing motors and access controls. 5. Policy ENV 1 of the East Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2015 (ECLP) requires proposals to complement existing development and protect their wider landscape setting. ECLP Policy ENV 2 requires designs to have regard to local context, preserve character, appearance and quality and be of a scale and form which relates sympathetically to the surrounding area. Fordham Neighbourhood Plan (FNP) Policy 2 requires proposals to respond to characteristics of the area. 6. Whilst the walls are in materials found elsewhere in the village and wider area, they appear unusual as a boundary treatment in this location and would remain so, even at the reduced height proposed. This is exacerbated by their juxtaposition adjacent to open fields, from which they appear as an uncharacteristic feature.
Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham, CB7 5LX — East Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Whilst they complement the materials of existing development, they harm their landscape setting, fail to have regard to the totality of the local context and do not https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham, CB7 5LX — East Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Whilst they complement the materials of existing development, they harm their landscape setting, fail to have regard to the totality of the local context and do not https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham, CB7 5LX — East Cambridgeshire District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V0510/W/24/3355673 relate sympathetically to the surrounding area. These are harms, contrary to ECLP Policies ENV 1 and ENV 2 and FNP Policy 2. 7. Whilst both the form and the materials of the proposed gates are acceptable as characteristic of the area, it is not clear that they would be freestanding. Indeed, it appears that they would be hung from the walls and therefore not severable from the rest of the proposed development. Other Matters 8. I acknowledge that, if the walls were set further back from the highway, they may be permitted development. However, their height in proximity to the lane causes at least part of their impact to its character and that of the wider landscape, so I attach limited weight to this as a material consideration. Conclusion 9. The proposal would appear out of keeping in this location and harm its landscape setting, contrary to the development plan. This is not outweighed by other material considerations, including the potential fall-back of setting the walls further back from the road, and so the appeal is dismissed.
Land at the entrance of Arthurs Way, Fordham, CB7 5LX — East Cambridgeshire District Council — S Simms INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶6
The walls are in materials found elsewhere in the village, but appear unusual as a boundary treatment in this location, harming the landscape setting and failing to have regard to the local context.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶6
The walls harm the landscape setting, failing to have regard to the local context and not relating sympathetically to the surrounding area, contravening policy ENV 1 and ENV 2 of the East Cambridgeshire Local Plan.
Living conditions Neutral
The gates would appear acceptable as characteristic of the area, but their form and materials may not be clear in the proposed design.
Parking Neutral ¶8
Setting the walls further back from the road may be permitted development, but their height in proximity to the lane causes at least part of their impact, so limited weight is attached to this as a material consideration.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| ECLP Policy ENV 1 |
Substantial |
| ECLP Policy ENV 2 |
Substantial |
| FNP Policy 2 |
Substantial |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 27 March 2025 under the Open Government Licence.