Case 3354986

Flat 3, 15 Aberdare Gardens, LONDON, NW6 3AJ

London Borough of Camden — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
25 February 2025
Authority
London Borough of Camden
Inspector
Butcher C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr K Bernstein
LPA reference
2024/2824/P
ONS LPA code
E09000007
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
3 December 2024

Summary AI

The Inspector found the Council's behaviour in refusing planning permission to be unreasonable, resulting in unnecessary expense for the appellant. A full award of costs is therefore warranted.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Flat 3, 15 Aberdare Gardens, LONDON, NW6 3AJ — London Borough of Camden — Costs Decision Site visit made on 5 February 2025 by C Butcher BSc MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 25 February 2025 Flat 3, 15 Aberdare Gardens, London NW6 3AJ Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/X5210/W/24/3354986 • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Keith Bernstein for a full award of costs against the Council of the London Borough of Camden. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the creation of roof terrace with railings with associated roof alterations and skylights. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is allowed in the terms set out below. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. Matters relating to character and appearance are generally quite subjective. However, in this instance, the external changes to No.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Flat 3, 15 Aberdare Gardens, LONDON, NW6 3AJ — London Borough of Camden — Costs Decision 15 would be very minor and largely unnoticeable from the street. Furthermore, the Council seemingly failed to sufficiently consider that such schemes are already a feature of the street scape in the immediate area, particularly at No. 4 which is opposite the appeal site. It therefore seems to me that refusing the original application was unreasonable. 4. For these reasons, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has occurred and a full award of costs is therefore warranted. Costs Order 5. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Council of the London Borough of Camden shall pay to Mr Keith Bernstein, the costs of the appeal proceedings described in the heading of this decision; such costs are to be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Flat 3, 15 Aberdare Gardens, LONDON, NW6 3AJ — London Borough of Camden — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/X5210/W/24/3354986 The applicant is now invited to submit to the Council of the London Borough of Camden to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 C Butcher

Flat 3, 15 Aberdare Gardens, LONDON, NW6 3AJ — London Borough of Camden — C Butcher INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶3

The external changes to the property would be very minor and largely unnoticeable from the street.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶4

The Council's refusal was unreasonable due to their failure to sufficiently consider the existing schemes in the area.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 25 February 2025 under the Open Government Licence.