Case 3354861

Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY

North Yorkshire Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
24 March 2025
Authority
North Yorkshire Council
Inspector
Clark L
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Zest Eco
LPA reference
ZC24/02431/FUL
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
5 November 2024

Summary AI

The appeal for three rapid electric vehicle chargers was dismissed due to concerns over highway safety and parking provision. The inspector found that the proposal would displace available parking capacity, inhibit the free flow of traffic, and conflict with Policy T13 of the Harrogate District Local Plan 2020.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY — North Yorkshire Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 11 February 2025 by L Clark MSc MRTPI Decision by John Morrison BA (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 24 March 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/U2750/W/24/3354861 Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Zest Eco against the decision of North Yorkshire Council. • The application Ref is ZC24/02431/FUL. • The development proposed is the siting of 3.no rapid electric vehicle chargers together with ancillary electrical equipment serving 6.no EV charging bays. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Appeal Procedure 2. The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal. Main Issue 3. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with specific regard to parking provision and the free flow of traffic. Reasons for the Recommendation 4. The appeal site is an area of land situated alongside the River Nidd on Abbey Road which is a picturesque location.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY — North Yorkshire Council — Appeal Decision Roads along the river near to the site are narrow with only limited parking available. This section of Abbey Road serves a relatively small number of dwellings with no through traffic. At the time of my site visit, the appeal site was being used for the parking of seven vehicles albeit spaces were not demarcated. There are commercial and tourist facilities close to the site. 5. I have not been provided with any details of a mechanism to ensure that the parking would be available for all vehicles or limited solely to electric ones. Whilst it is alleged that any other vehicle would not be prevented from using the spaces, it would be reasonable to assume that users thereof would be dissuaded from doing so if they were marked up as Electric Vehicle (EV) charging points. More likely than not therefore, this would displace what appeared to be well used capacity elsewhere. 6. General parking, both restricted and unrestricted, in the area is at a premium and it can be particularly difficult to find suitable parking close to the appeal site along the River Nidd. I have no doubt that the need for parking would surge during the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY — North Yorkshire Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/U2750/W/24/3354861 summer months given the charming location and the tourist offer that is available. The loss of parking would result in more vehicles using other locations along the narrow streets close to the River Nidd which would inhibit the free flow of traffic and therefore harm highway safety. I do not disagree that there is an increasing demand for EV spaces but there are already provisions in the town, and I have not been provided with a compelling case to suggest why the EV charging bays need to be in this specific location. 7. Given the restriction for through traffic on Abbey Road, there would only be a relatively small number of vehicles that would pass the appeal site each day. The EV charging points would be in a similar location to the vehicles that were parked on the appeal site at the time of my site visit which would therefore still provide adequate space alongside the site for a driver of a vehicle to safely pass through. Combining both factors together, the proposal would not exacerbate the potential for vehicle collisions due to there still be adequate passing space available. 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY — North Yorkshire Council — Appeal Decision Nevertheless, given the harm that I have identified to highway safety above as a result of parking availability, the proposal would not meet the requirements of Policy T13 of the Harrogate District Local Plan 2020 which is concerned with providing convenient parking amongst other things. Conclusion and Recommendation 9. For the reasons given above, the appeal scheme would conflict with the development plan and there are no sufficiently weighty material considerations to indicate a decision other than in accordance therewith. I therefore recommend that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 L Clark

Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY — North Yorkshire Council — L Clark APPEAL PLANNING OFFICER Inspector’s Decision 10. I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 John Morrison

Parking area adjacent to Abbey Road, Knaresborough, HG5 8HY — North Yorkshire Council — John Morrison INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Highway safety
Against appellant
¶4

The inspector found that the proposal would displace available parking capacity, leading to a potential for more vehicles to use other locations along the narrow streets, inhibiting the free flow of traffic.

Parking
Against appellant
¶5

The inspector found that the proposal would displace available parking capacity, leading to a potential for more vehicles to use other locations along the narrow streets, inhibiting the free flow of traffic.

Planning obligations
Neutral
¶6

The inspector found that the need for parking would surge during the summer months, but noted that there are already provisions in the town and that the appellant had not provided a compelling case to suggest why the EV charging bays need to be in this specific location.

Planning obligations
Neutral
¶7

The inspector found that the proposal would not exacerbate the potential for vehicle collisions due to the availability of passing space.

Planning obligations
Neutral
¶8

The inspector found that the proposal would conflict with the development plan, specifically Policy T13 of the Harrogate District Local Plan 2020, which is concerned with providing convenient parking amongst other things.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
T13
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 24 March 2025 under the Open Government Licence.