Case 3351222

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL

Cheshire East — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
23 December 2024
Authority
Cheshire East
Inspector
Ashworth S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr David Lee
LPA reference
24/2158M
ONS LPA code
E06000049
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
7 October 2024

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed due to the inspector's finding that condition 6, which restricted permitted development rights, was neither reasonable nor necessary in the context of Green Belt policy. The condition was deemed to be a restriction on national permitted development rights without clear justification.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by S Ashworth BA (Hons) BPL MRTPI

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — by S Ashworth BA (Hons) BPL MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 23 December 2024

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 2LL

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 2LL • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Mr David Lee against the decision of Cheshire East Council. • The application Ref 24/2158M was dated 10 June 2024. • The application sought planning permission for rebuilding farmhouse without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 42202P, dated 17 April 1986. • The condition in dispute is No 6 which states that: ‘The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the conditions herein contained but save as aforesaid no development (as defined in Section 22(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971) shall at any time hereafter be undertaken in, on, over or under the said land without express consent of the local planning authority notwithstanding that any such development might otherwise have been permitted by virtue of the Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1977 and subsequent amendment thereto’.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 2LL

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 2LL • The reason given for the condition is: ‘Having regard to the particular circumstances of the applicant and the location of the site within the Rural Area where there is a presumption against development except where justified by long term agricultural or forestry need’.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/R0660/W/24/3351222 number of conditions including condition 6 which, in effect, withdrew permitted development rights. The appellant sought permission for the removal of the condition and the refusal of that application has resulted in this appeal. 4. The site lies within the Green Belt although this is not mentioned in the reason for imposing the condition. However, the reason for the refusal of the application to remove the condition does relate to the openness of the Green Belt and this matter has been addressed by the appellant. 5. Accordingly, the main issue in this case is whether the condition is reasonable and necessary having regard to the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it. Reasons 6. The Framework sets out at paragraph 56 that local planning authorities should consider whether otherwise unacceptable development could be made acceptable through the use of planning conditions. It goes on to say that planning conditions should be kept to a minimum and only imposed where they are necessary, relevant to planning and to the development permitted, enforceable, precise, and reasonable in all other respects. 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a There are few details of the original application or dwelling before me, no plans or officer assessment and the reason for the condition in this case is unclear. Whilst it refers to the location of the development in a rural area where there was a presumption against development, it is unclear how the personal circumstances of the appellant had a bearing on the removal of permitted development rights. Moreover, there is nothing before me to suggest that the existing house is more sizeable than the dwelling it replaced, or any other particular circumstances which might have justified the imposition of the condition at the time. 8. Notwithstanding that, the Council considers the condition to be necessary to control the spread of built form in order to preserve the openness of the Green Belt. The fundamental aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. That aim is reflected in Policy PG3 of the Cheshire Local Plan. 9. However, paragraph 55 of the Framework, states that planning conditions should not be used to restrict national permitted development rights unless there is clear justification to do so.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a Planning Practice Guidance (the PPG) states that conditions restricting the future use of permitted development rights or changes of use may not pass the test of reasonableness or necessity, and that blanket removal of freedoms to carry out small scale domestic and non- domestic alterations that would otherwise not require an application for planning permission are unlikely to meet the tests of reasonableness and necessity. 10. I understand that the house has already been extended and inevitably, if the property were extended again, or outbuildings erected, there would be some impact on the openness of the Green Belt. However, any such development would be limited by the requirements and conditions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (GPDO) and any application for full planning permission would be subject to national and local planning policy. Moreover, the GPDO does not place a restriction on extensions https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — dwelling following the grant of planning permission in 1986, subject to a Appeal Decision APP/R0660/W/24/3351222 to dwellings within the Green Belt as it does in other designated areas including National Parks and Conservation Areas. It seems to me that had the Government intended to remove or restrict permitted development rights in the Green Belt it would have done so. 11. Based on all I have seen and read, there are no specific circumstances in this particular case that would justify a stricter approach to permitted development than exists on other dwellings in the Green Belt. On that basis the condition is neither reasonable or necessary having regard to the openness of the Green Belt and accordingly it does not meet the tests for conditions as set out above. 12. For these reasons the appeal is allowed and the planning permission is varied by the removal of condition 6.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 S Ashworth

Faulkners Farm, Prestbury Road, WILMSLOW, SK9 2LL — Cheshire East — S Ashworth INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶10

The inspector noted that any development within the Green Belt would be subject to national and local planning policy, and that the GPDO does not place a restriction on extensions to dwellings within the Green Belt.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶11

The inspector found that there were no specific circumstances in this case that would justify a stricter approach to permitted development than exists on other dwellings in the Green Belt.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 56, PG3 of the Cheshire Local Plan
Substantial
Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 23 December 2024 under the Open Government Licence.