Case 3350442

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST

Castle Point Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
26 March 2025
Authority
Castle Point Borough Council
Inspector
Francis L
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Josh Pereira
LPA reference
24/0132/VAR
ONS LPA code
E07000069
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
18 September 2024

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the appeal proposal's conflict with the original description of development, as per the Finney judgment. A fresh planning application would be required for the proposed changes.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by L Francis BA (Hons) MA MRTPI

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — by L Francis BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 26 March 2025

Page 1 · Chunk 1 443 Rayleigh Road, Thundersley, Benfleet, Essex SS7 3ST

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — 443 Rayleigh Road, Thundersley, Benfleet, Essex SS7 3ST • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Mr Josh Pereira against the decision of Castle Point Borough Council. • The application Ref is 24/0132/VAR. • The application sought planning permission for the demolition of single storey rear extension and erection of single storey rear/side extension without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 23/0725FUL, dated 29 January 2024. • The conditions in dispute are Nos 2 and 3 which state that: 2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans listed on this decision notice. 3. The external surfaces of the development hereby approved shall be treated in accordance with the details specified on the submitted plans or shall be of similar appearance to the materials used in the construction of the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 443 Rayleigh Road, Thundersley, Benfleet, Essex SS7 3ST

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — 443 Rayleigh Road, Thundersley, Benfleet, Essex SS7 3ST • The reasons given for the conditions are: (2) For the avoidance of doubt and in order to achieve satisfactory development of the site and (3) In the interest of visual amenity.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision.

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision.

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 5 received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision.

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision. Appeal Decision APP/M1520/W/24/3350442 4. In light of the above, the main issues are: • whether the appeal proposal can be considered under section 73 of the Act; and, if so, • the effect of the appeal proposal on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to privacy, outlook and overshadowing. Reasons Section 73 5. The description of development on the original permission (Ref: 23/0725FUL) referred to the “demolition of single storey rear extension and erection of single storey rear/side extension”. The original description of development contained no reference to a first-floor terrace. The appeal proposal would therefore conflict with the original description of development. It follows that this particular amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 of the Act and a fresh planning application would be required. 6. I note the appellant’s point that the Council determined the application and did not consider the proposed changes to go to the heart of the development. Nevertheless, the Finney judgment is clear that an application under section 73 of the Act may not be used to obtain a permission that would require a variation to the operative part of the planning permission. 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision.

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — received from the appellant, which I have taken into account in my decision. Given my findings above, it is not necessary for me to go on to consider the appeal proposal’s effect upon the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers. Conclusion 8. For the reasons given above, the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 L Francis

443 Rayleigh Road, Benfleet, SS7 3ST — Castle Point Borough Council — L Francis INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶5

The original description of development contained no reference to a first-floor terrace, making the appeal proposal beyond the powers under section 73 of the Act.

Living conditions
Neutral
¶7

Given the previous finding, it was not necessary to consider the appeal proposal's effect on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Finney judgment
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 26 March 2025 under the Open Government Licence.