Case 3347918

Kimmins Moor, Skilgate, Taunton, Somerset, TA4 2DL

Somerset West and Taunton * — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
26 June 2025
Authority
Somerset West and Taunton *
Inspector
Nicholson D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Peter Govier
LPA reference
3/30/23/001
ONS LPA code
E07000246
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
16 October 2024

Summary AI

The Inspector refused the application for an award of costs against Somerset Council, citing that the Appellant's costs were unavoidable due to the Council's delay, but not resulting from unnecessary or wasted expense.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Kimmins Moor, Skilgate, Taunton, Somerset, TA4 2DL — Somerset West and Taunton * — Costs Decision Site visit made on 9 June 2025 by D Nicholson RIBA IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 26 June 2025 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/W3330/W/24/3347918 Kimmins Moor, Skilgate, Taunton, Somerset, TA4 2DL • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Peter Govier for a full award of costs against Somerset Council. • The appeal was against the failure of the Council to issue a notice of their decision within the prescribed period on an application for planning permission for: Erection of 1 No. dwelling with associated works. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The Council failed to determine the application within a reasonable time period, obliging the Appellant to take it to appeal.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Kimmins Moor, Skilgate, Taunton, Somerset, TA4 2DL — Somerset West and Taunton * — Costs Decision The extent of delay was unreasonable. I acknowledge that during this time the Councils were in the process of merging, but while this may be a reason it is not an excuse. On the other hand, the Council’s statement explains why it would have refused the application, meaning that an appeal would have been inevitable in any case. Consequently, the costs of the appeal were unavoidable. 4. Therefore, while unreasonable behaviour may have occurred, this did not result in unnecessary or wasted expense and an award of costs is not warranted.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 D Nicholson

Kimmins Moor, Skilgate, Taunton, Somerset, TA4 2DL — Somerset West and Taunton * — D Nicholson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Other
Against appellant
¶3

The Council's delay was unreasonable, but did not result in unnecessary or wasted expense for the Appellant.

Other
For appellant
¶4

An award of costs is not warranted, as the Appellant's costs were unavoidable due to the Council's delay.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 26 June 2025 under the Open Government Licence.