Case 3345706

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE

East Devon District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
24 October 2024
Authority
East Devon District Council
Inspector
Reed D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr David Selway
LPA reference
23/2373/PIP
ONS LPA code
E07000040
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
18 July 2024

Summary AI

The appeal for a permission in principle (PIP) for 4 dwellings on a site in Northleigh was dismissed due to the unsustainable location, impact on the character and appearance of the area, and potential harm to the local landscape and conservation area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 5 September 2024 by David Reed BSc DipTP DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 24 October 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/U1105/W/24/3345706 Land to the west of Backwells Mead, Northleigh EX24 6DE • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant permission in principle. • The appeal is made by Mr David Selway against the decision of East Devon District Council. • The application Ref 23/2373/PIP, dated 12 October 2023, was refused by notice dated 5 December 2023. • The development proposed is the erection of 4 dwellings. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The appeal statement suggests that the proposal could deliver affordable or self-build & custom housing. However, Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) is clear that planning conditions cannot be attached to a permission in principle (PIP), nor can a planning obligation be entered into1. In the absence of any mechanism to secure such housing these suggestions can only be given limited weight. The proposal must therefore be assessed as most likely to deliver market housing. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision A similar proposal for four dwellings on the site was dismissed on appeal in 20152. Main Issues 4. The scope of an application for PIP is limited to location, land use and amount of development. The main issues therefore are: • whether the proposal would be in a sustainable location; and • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons Sustainable location 5. The proposal is for 4 dwellings on a small rectangular grass field to the south of Colyton Road and west of Backwells Mead, a cul-de-sac of bungalows on the western side of the small village of Northleigh. To the west and south the site 1 PPG Paragraph 020 Reference ID 58-020-20180615 & Paragraph 022 Reference ID: 58-022-20180615 2 Reference APP/U1105/A/14/2221520 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/U1105/W/24/3345706 adjoins open countryside whilst across Colyton Road to the north lies the village hall. The site is screened by hedgerows on all four boundaries. 6. Unlike the larger villages, the East Devon Local Plan 2016 (the LP) does not include a built-up area boundary for Northleigh which consequently lies in the countryside for planning policy purposes. As such LP Policy S7 applies which limits development to that specifically permitted by other local plan policies, none of which are directly relevant in this case. 7. The village offers only limited services and facilities for its residents, namely a church, village hall and one bus a week, but no school, shop or public house. Most needs would need to be met at Honiton or Colyton some 3-4 miles away by narrow rural lanes with the local primary school at Farway some 1.9 miles away. Inevitably, new residents would depend for most journeys on use of the private car, and whilst some may be electric, the scheme would not lead to a sustainable pattern of development overall.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision This would conflict with LP Policies S5B and TC2 which support proposals in locations that promote sustainable modes of transport including walking, cycling and public transport. Character and appearance 8. The proposal would involve a new access through the hedgerow on Colyton Road and introduce new buildings and driveways into an unspoilt green field which currently forms part of the rural surroundings of the village. This would fundamentally change the character and appearance of the area and represent an erosion of the open countryside designated as part of the East Devon National Landscape (NL) where great weight should be given to conserving landscape and enhancing scenic beauty3. The proposal would conflict with LP Policies S7 and S46 which seek to protect distinctive landscape, amenity and environmental qualities, and to conserve and enhance landscape character, particularly in the NL. Whilst listed in the reasons for refusal, should a scheme be justified on the site, it would be possible to deliver high quality design to satisfy LP Policy D1. Other Matters 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision The appellant understandably points to the planning permission granted in 2022 for six affordable dwellings on a site in the countryside at Chilcombe Cross, a few hundred metres to west of the appeal site and further from the main built-up part of the village4. In the same way as the current proposal, that scheme raised the issues set out above. However, importantly, the scheme was promoted by the Upper Coly Community Land Trust to deliver affordable housing to meet a specific need that had been identified within a group of villages, none of which have a defined built-up area boundary. A site search process was undertaken and it is not clear whether the appeal site was identified as a possibility. In any event, the scheme was secured by a S106 legal agreement to deliver the affordable housing which, as explained in paragraph 2, would not be possible in this case. 10. The appellant argues that the identified need has not been fully delivered, but this is not accurately quantified.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision There appears to be a need for self-build & custom housing across the district, but it is not clear how much relates to this area, and again the need to secure such housing would not be possible through 3 NPPF paragraph 182 4 Reference 20/1234/FUL https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision There appears to be a need for self-build & custom housing across the district, but it is not clear how much relates to this area, and again the need to secure such housing would not be possible through 3 NPPF paragraph 182 4 Reference 20/1234/FUL https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/U1105/W/24/3345706 a PIP. It is apparent that the Chilcombe Cross scheme was properly justified and considered as a rural exception site which does not apply here. 11. The Council claims 4.5 years deliverable housing land supply, a figure that appears to be accepted by the appellant. Since a new local plan is under preparation and draft proposals have been published under Regulation 185, the Council need only demonstrate four years supply under the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) paragraph 2266. The presumption in favour of sustainable development consequently does not apply. 12. On 30 July 2024 a written ministerial statement, draft versions of a revised NPPF and standard method for assessing local housing need were published, all of which place greater importance on the need to deliver more housing. However, the draft policies are subject to consultation and their definitive implications not yet known. 13. The site lies within the zone around the Beer Quarry and Caves Special Area of Conservation (SAC) where impacts on certain habitat may disrupt the foraging patterns of protected bat species.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — Appeal Decision As such the proposal, in combination with other plans and projects, may adversely affect the integrity of the SAC. In the absence of an appropriate assessment and potential mitigation measures the proposal may be ‘habitats development’ and it is not possible to grant PIP7. Conclusion 14. The proposal would provide 4 additional dwellings (potentially affordable and/or self-build & custom housing) which would contribute to local housing needs and bring social and economic benefits to the village. However, these material considerations do not outweigh the conclusions reached in relation to the two main issues and the associated conflict with the development plan. The outcome of the appeal is the same as that in 2015. 15. For these reasons the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 David Reed

Land West Of Backwells Mead , Northleigh, EX24 6DE — East Devon District Council — David Reed INSPECTOR 5 From November 2022 to January 2023 and secondly from May 2024 to June 2024 6 December 2023 version 7 PPG Paragraph 005 Reference ID 58-005-20190315 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Other
Against appellant
¶5

The site is in an unsustainable location, as it is in the countryside and lacks access to services and facilities, making it reliant on private transport.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The proposal would fundamentally change the character and appearance of the area, introducing new buildings and driveways into an unspoilt green field, and eroding the open countryside.

Ecology and biodiversity
Against appellant
¶13

The proposal may adversely affect the integrity of the Beer Quarry and Caves Special Area of Conservation, and its impacts on protected bat species.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
LP Policy S7
Determinative
LP Policy S5B
Substantial
NPPF 226
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 24 October 2024 under the Open Government Licence.