Case 3343353

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY

West Lancashire District Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
10 September 2024
Authority
West Lancashire District Council
Inspector
Hockenhull H
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
United Utilities
LPA reference
2023/1002/PIP
ONS LPA code
E07000127
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
27 June 2024

Summary AI

The appeal for permission in principle to build two dwellings on a site in Wrightington, Lancashire, was allowed. The Inspector considered the site's location, proposed land use, and amount of development, and found it to be suitable for residential development, in accordance with policies SP1, GN1, and RS1 of the Local Plan.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 20 August 2024 by Helen Hockenhull BA (Hons) B.Pl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 10 September 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/P2365/W/24/3343353 Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant permission in principle. • The appeal is made by United Utilities against the decision of West Lancashire Borough Council. • The application Ref is 2023/1002/PIP. • The development proposed is Application for Permission in Principle - Erection of a maximum of two dwellings. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and permission in principle is granted for the erection of a maximum of two dwellings at land north of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, WN6 9RY in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2023/1002/PIP, dated 2 November 2023. Applications for costs 2. An application for costs was made by United Utilities against West Lancashire Borough Council. This application is the subject of a separate Decision. Preliminary Matters 3. The proposal is for permission in principle (PiP).

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that this is an alternative way of obtaining planning permission for housing-led development. The permission in principle consent route has two stages: the first stage (or permission in principle stage) establishes whether a site is suitable in-principle and the second (‘technical details consent’) stage is when the detailed development proposals are assessed. This appeal relates to the first of these two stages. 4. The scope of the considerations for permission in principle is limited to location, land use and the amount of development permitted. All other matters are considered as part of a subsequent Technical Details Consent application if permission in principle is granted. I have determined the appeal accordingly. 5. The original planning application refers to the appellant as United Utilities, however the appeal form states the appellant is United Utilities Property Services. For clarity, I have used that stated on the original application form in the banner heading above. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/P2365/W/24/3343353

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision Main Issues 6. The main issue is whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development. Reasons 7. The appeal site forms a greenfield plot of around 0.15 hectares to the east of Mossy Lea Road in Wrightington Bar. It lies in a residential area within the settlement boundary of the village. 8. Wrightington Bar is defined in West Lancashire Local Plan Policy SP1 as a Small Rural Village. Policy RS1 permits limited infill, up to 4 dwellings within such settlements. The proposal is for two dwellings on an infill site within the settlement and is therefore compliant with the above policy. Policy RS1 also sets out a minimum density of 30 dwellings per hectare subject to specific site context. The appeal proposal equates to a density of around 13 dwellings per hectare. However, giving consideration to the rural village location of the site, and the need to consider topography and the amenity of adjoining residential dwellings, I am satisfied that the amount of development proposed is acceptable and therefore policy compliant. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision The site is in an accessible location with Mossy Lea Road forming a bus route; a bus stop lies immediately adjacent to the site. Local facilities are available in Wrightington village centre and in the nearby village of Heskin. 10. The Council’s reason for refusal states that the proposal conflicts with Policy EN3 (v) and (vi). This Policy seeks to provide green infrastructure and open recreation space. In paragraph 9.28, the Plan defines green infrastructure as including parks, sports facilities, play areas, natural and semi natural open spaces, footpaths, green corridors, allotments and the inland waterways and canal network. The main focus of the policy is to enhance and safeguard existing green links, create new and accessible green infrastructure, protect open space and facilities with a recreational value, provide open space in new development and protect designated countryside recreation sites. 11. Part v) of the policy seeks to prevent development on open spaces that contribute to the distinctive form, character and setting of a settlement. Part vi) aims to safeguard open space which is a focal point within the built-up area. 12. The appeal site is a small piece of vacant land in the settlement.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision It is not publicly accessible and has no recreational value. Furthermore, it does not meet the definition of open space in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, which describes open space as any land laid out as public garden, or used for the purpose of public recreation, or land which is a disused burial ground. The appellant has commented that the appeal site is not denoted as being subject to Policy EN3 in the Local Plan Policies Map, unlike the Mossy Lea children’s play park approximately 400 metres to the south. I therefore conclude that Policy EN3 does not apply in this case. 13. Notwithstanding the above, if it were to apply, Wrightington Bar forms a linear settlement along a main spine road. The development of the appeal site for two dwellings would be consistent with the character of the settlement. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/P2365/W/24/3343353

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision The site does not make a significant contribution to the setting of the village, which is defined by the open countryside which surrounds it. The proposal therefore does not in my view conflict with part v) of Policy EV3. During my site visit, I struggled to identify a focal point for the village, though it could possibly be argued that the public house serves this purpose. Nevertheless, the appeal site itself does not form a focal point within the built up area. Part vi) of the policy is therefore not relevant. 14. The Council advises that their Open Space Study conducted in 2018 found a shortage of open green space in the Eastern Parishes of the Borough. However, the study goes on to state that the Parish Council in Wrightington considers there is sufficient open space to meet the needs of the community. Having regard to the site’s lack of recreational value, its loss would not be unacceptable in terms of open space provision in the village. 15. Given the above, I find that the appeal site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development proposed.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision The development complies with Policies SP1, GN1 and RS1 of the Local Plan which seek to achieve sustainable development. Other Matters 16. The Council’s reason for refusal references paragraph 135b) of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) which requires planning policies and decisions to ensure that developments are visually attractive as a result of good architecture, layout and appropriate and effective landscaping. The appeal relates to a PiP where details of design and layout form matters for the Technical Details Consent. This paragraph in the Framework is therefore not applicable at this stage where the principles of development are being considered. 17. I acknowledge that the Council’s concern relates to the impact on the visual character and appearance of Mossy Lea Road. Such matters are relevant to whether the site is suitable for development. The site is well screened by existing hedgerow, trees and shrubs on the site boundary with Mossy Lea Road and also on the southern boundary along the access to the electricity sub station.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision The retention of these features, to maintain the visual amenity of the area can be addressed at the Technical Details Consent stage and secured by appropriate conditions. 18. I note that there is a milestone on the site boundary with Mossy Lea Road which forms a Grade II Listed structure. Whilst the development does not affect it directly, it will have an impact on its setting. This can be addressed at the Technical Details stage to ensure its significance is not harmed. Conditions 19. Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) makes clear that it is not possible for conditions to be attached to a grant of permission in principle, whose terms may only include the site location, the type and amount of development. The PPG sets out that where permission in principle is granted, the default duration of that permission is three years. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/P2365/W/24/3343353

Page 4 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Appeal Decision Conclusion 20. For the reasons given above, and having had regard to all matters raised, I allow this appeal.

Page 4 · Chunk 9 Helen Hockenhull

Land North of Electricity Substation, Mossy Lea Road, Wrightington, Lancashire, WN6 9RY — West Lancashire District Council — Helen Hockenhull INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/P2365/W/24/3343353

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
For appellant
¶10

The appeal site is a small piece of vacant land in the settlement, not publicly accessible, and has no recreational value, so it does not meet the definition of open space in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

Heritage impact
For appellant
¶18

The development does not affect the Grade II Listed structure directly, and its impact on the setting can be addressed at the Technical Details Consent stage.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶9

The site is in an accessible location with a bus route, and local facilities are available in the nearby village centre and in Heskin.

Parking
For appellant
¶null

No mention of parking in the decision letter.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶17

The site is well screened by existing hedgerow, trees, and shrubs on the site boundary with Mossy Lea Road, and these features can be retained to maintain the visual amenity of the area.

Other
For appellant
¶null

The Inspector struggled to identify a focal point for the village, but the appeal site itself does not form a focal point within the built-up area.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
SP1
Determinative
GN1
Determinative
RS1
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 10 September 2024 under the Open Government Licence.