Case 3341719

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH

Maldon District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
7 November 2024
Authority
Maldon District Council
Inspector
Smith J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Stephen Foster
LPA reference
23/01134/OUT
ONS LPA code
E07000074
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
15 May 2024

Summary AI

The appeal for a new 2-bedroom, 2-storey end-of-terrace house on Alamein Road was dismissed due to the proposed development's harm to the character and appearance of the area. The inspector found that the development would conflict with policies in the Maldon Local Plan and the Burnham-on-Crouch Neighbourhood Development Plan, as well as the National Planning Policy Framework. The proposal would also harm the European Sites, including the Blackwater Estuary and Dengie Special Protection Areas.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 23 October 2024 by Jane Smith MA MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 07 November 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/X1545/W/24/3341719 6 & 8 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch CM0 8JH • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant outline planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Stephen Foster against the decision of Maldon District Council. • The application Ref is OUT/MAL/23/01134. • The development proposed is described as ‘Construction of new 2 bedroom, 2 storey end of terrace house attached to no. 6 Alamein Road. New dwelling would be in keeping with existing houses in the terrace/street’. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Application for costs 2. An application for costs was made by Mr Stephen Foster against Maldon District Council. This application is the subject of a separate decision. Preliminary Matters 3. In the banner heading above, I have used the address given on the application form.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision The decision notice and appeal form refer only to 6 Alamein Road but, since the site also includes land currently within the boundary of 8 Alamein Road, the above address accurately describes the extent of the site. 4. The application was in outline with all matters reserved. Therefore, details of access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale would be reserved for future consideration. I have accordingly treated details indicating the scale, layout and appearance of the proposed dwelling as being indicative, while noting that the description of development specifies a two storey property of two bedrooms, attached to no. 6 Alamein Road. I have also noted that vehicular access would be from Alamein Road. Main Issue 5. The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 6. The appeal site is in a varied residential area including detached, semi- detached and terraced properties, mostly on two storeys but with some bungalows. Near the appeal site, most are on two storeys, of typical mid-20th https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X1545/W/24/3341719 Century appearance, and either semi-detached or in short terraces. That includes those to either side of the proposed dwelling. 7. Since the description of development specifies a two-storey end of terrace house, I have considered the appeal on that basis, while keeping in mind that its detailed layout, appearance and scale would be reserved matters. Various separation distances are mentioned in the appellant’s evidence, but the indicative plans show a gap of around 2.4m from the existing dwelling at 8 Alamein Road and the appellant’s evidence places some emphasis on this level of separation being achievable. I have accordingly had regard to this likely dimension when considering whether, in principle, the proposed dwelling could be satisfactorily accommodated. 8. Although the gaps between dwellings along Alamein Road vary, the list provided by the appellant shows that gaps of well over 2.4m are not uncommon. About half of the dimensions listed exceed that figure, in several cases by a substantial amount.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Of the others, many are corner properties, where the smaller gap on one side of the building is offset by more generous space around the building as a whole, resulting from its position at the end of a row, next to the highway. This applies to the new detached house opposite the appeal site, as well as the extension at 20 Alamein Road and the detached bungalows on either side of the junction with Normandy Avenue. 9. Between 32 and 34 Alamein Road there is a single storey, flat roofed extension and the gap at first floor level is significantly greater than the 1m listed. At 26 Alamein Road, the dwelling adjoins the driveway to Curlew House, so the total space across the boundary is greater than implied. Similarly, the dwelling under construction at 19A Alamein Road adjoins the gardens of the adjacent bungalows, providing additional space across the boundary. The pair of bungalows at 43 and 45 Alamein Road are grouped more closely, but collectively stand in a spacious setting, with the road on one side and a generous garden to the other. 10. Alamein Road is not of designated heritage or townscape value and could reasonably be described as an ordinary residential street typical of its era.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Nevertheless, the generally more generous spacing between the dwellings, particularly those not in corner locations, is a positive aspect of its character, which both Policy H4 and Policy D1 of the Maldon Local Plan1 (MLP) make clear should be taken into account. While Policy H4 is supportive of optimising the use of land through infill, it also requires that local circumstances, context and the overall merit of the proposal are considered on a site by site basis. 11. Currently, the gap between 6 and 8 Alamein Road is consistent with the surrounding context and provides domestic outbuildings and parking for the existing dwellings. As such, the site is not significantly underused, and the proposal does not fully satisfy the first criteria for infill development in Policy H4. The existing outbuildings are modest in scale with low roofs, providing a sense of space above, with trees visible at the rear. Therefore, at present the gap is not visually enclosed. Nor is the view through it unsightly. 12. Introduction of a two-storey property would create a significantly higher level of visual enclosure. The space between the dwellings would be amongst the smallest along the street.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Since the site is constrained between two existing 1 Maldon District Approved Local Development Plan 2014-2029, adopted 2017 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Since the site is constrained between two existing 1 Maldon District Approved Local Development Plan 2014-2029, adopted 2017 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X1545/W/24/3341719 buildings and not on a corner, no alleviating space would be available around the plot. Consequently, the proposed dwelling would look cramped, to a degree that would detract from the character and appearance of the street. 13. While terraces of four dwellings, or comparable scale, have become more prevalent as a result of various permitted additions, that does not indicate that all such terraces are inherently suitable to their sites. Nor would the slightly greater depth of the front gardens on this side of the road compensate for the limited space between the buildings. The dwellings permitted in Dorset Road are in a different street, which includes more intensively developed terraced properties, so the limited gaps are less inappropriate. The extension at 6 Orchard Road is also in a different street, and next to a building of a different form, so although the host dwelling is similar, it stands in a different context. 14. For the reasons given above, I conclude that the proposed development would be harmful to the character and appearance of the area.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision It would conflict with relevant requirements in Policies D1 and H4 of the MLP and Policies HC.2 and HO.8 of the Burnham-on-Crouch Neighbourhood Development Plan 2017 which require amongst other things that new development should respect and enhance character and local context. It would also conflict with relevant paragraphs in the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) which, while supporting more efficient use of previously developed land, also include that development should be visually attractive and sympathetic to local character, including the surrounding built environment. Other Matters 15. The Council has acknowledged that there were no discussions with the appellant prior to the application being refused. However, since the application relates to the principle of adding an additional dwelling within a plot which is of finite size, there is no clear indication that such discussions would have led to a different outcome. Nor was the Council’s decision inconsistent, or otherwise arbitrary or subjective, since I have found that the other sites nearby display different characteristics. 16.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision It has not been alleged that there would be any harm to living conditions for occupiers of neighbouring properties, or that there would be any shortfall in the provision of garden land, parking or refuse storage, subject to consideration of the reserved matters. The elevational treatment is not a matter for this appeal but could in principle reflect that of the existing properties. However, these are neutral factors which weigh neither for nor against the proposal. 17. The proposal would make a small contribution to the supply of housing, on a brownfield site in an urban area where the development plan is supportive of additional housing in principle. However, the support in the Framework for such proposals is not at the expense of ensuring that all development is well designed. Furthermore, the Council’s Officer Report states that the supply of housing land exceeds five years and no evidence has been presented to the contrary. Within that context, the small benefit from one additional home would not outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the area. 18. The appeal site is within the Zone of Influence of the Blackwater Estuary and Dengie Special Protection Areas.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision These are among several European Sites https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 3 · Chunk 11 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision These are among several European Sites https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 12 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X1545/W/24/3341719 along the Essex Coast which are recognised for their value as coastal habitats and support internationally important populations of breeding and non- breeding bird species. They have been identified by Natural England as being vulnerable to harm as a result of recreational disturbance, which would be exacerbated by an increase in the local population resulting from new residential development, including through the cumulative effect of small-scale developments such as the appeal proposal. 19. The European Sites are covered by the Essex Coast Recreational disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy (RAMS) and, in partnership with other affected local planning authorities, the Council has adopted a RAMS SPD2, which sets out measures for the avoidance and mitigation of recreational disturbance. The appellant has indicated willingness to provide mitigation by means of a financial contribution, as specified in the RAMS SPD and explained in the Council’s Officer Report. However, no Unilateral Undertaking or other legal mechanism has been provided to secure that contribution. 20. Had I been minded to allow the appeal, this is a matter which I could have raised with the parties.

Page 4 · Chunk 13 Appeal Decision

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Appeal Decision It would also have been necessary for me to complete an Appropriate Assessment as required by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, to determine whether the appeal proposal would result in a significant effect, either alone or in combination with other development, on the European Sites. However, since I am dismissing the appeal for other reasons, it is not necessary to address the effect on European Sites in any further detail. Conclusion 21. The proposed development is contrary to the development plan and no material considerations indicate that a decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 14 Jane Smith

6 Alamein Road, Burnham on Crouch, Essex, CM0 8JH — Maldon District Council — Jane Smith INSPECTOR 2 Essex Coast Recreational disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy Supplementary Planning Document, May 2020 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶12

The proposed development would create a significantly higher level of visual enclosure, detracting from the character and appearance of the street.

Planning obligations
Neutral

The elevational treatment is not a matter for this appeal, but could in principle reflect that of the existing properties.

Living conditions
Neutral

No harm to living conditions for occupiers of neighbouring properties was alleged, and there would be no shortfall in the provision of garden land, parking, or refuse storage.

Ecology and biodiversity
Against appellant
¶19

The proposed development would exacerbate recreational disturbance of the European Sites, including the Blackwater Estuary and Dengie Special Protection Areas.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
MLP H4
Substantial
MLP D1
Substantial
BNC NDP HC.2
Moderate
BNC NDP HO.8
Moderate
NPPF
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 7 November 2024 under the Open Government Licence.