Case 3340278

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP

Warrington Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
9 August 2024
Authority
Warrington Borough Council
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Stephen Farthing
LPA reference
2022/42763
ONS LPA code
E06000007
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
28 March 2024

Summary AI

The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for 9 detached houses and formation of access from Stretton Road. The applicant sought costs against the Council on substantive grounds, alleging unreasonable behaviour. However, the Inspector found that the Council's decision stood scrutiny relative to the statutory approach to decision-taking and that the dispute was a matter of planning judgement, rather than unreasonable behaviour.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP — Warrington Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 24 July 2024 by M Ollerenshaw BSc (Hons) MTPl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 09 August 2024 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/M0655/W/24/3340278 North View, Stretton Road, Warrington WA4 4NP • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Stephen Farthing for a full award of costs against Warrington Borough Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for ‘proposed development of 9 detached houses and formation of access from Stretton Road’. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, costs may only be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably, in either a substantive or procedural way, and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary expense in the appeal process. It is an accepted principle that parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. 3. The applicant seeks costs against the Council on substantive grounds.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP — Warrington Borough Council — Costs Decision It is the applicant’s contention that the Council acted unreasonably by failing to give significant weight to the emerging Warrington Local Plan (LP) having particular regard to the proposed removal of the site from the Green Belt. It is claimed that the Council failed to produce evidence to substantiate the reasons for refusal on appeal; made vague, generalised or inaccurate assertions about the proposal’s impact; and prevented and delayed development which should clearly have been permitted, having regard to its accordance with the development plan, national policy and any other material considerations. 4. The planning application was refused by the Council in September 2023 when the statutory development plan for the area was the Warrington Local Plan Core Strategy (2014). The appeal site was within the Green Belt at that time. 5. Emerging LP Policy GB1 proposed to remove land from the Green Belt, including the site. The applicant claims that, as the Inspector raised no proposed main modifications in terms of Green Belt release for this site, there was no reason to suggest how further consultation on these modifications would have altered this position.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP — Warrington Borough Council — Costs Decision With the adoption of the LP, the site was removed from the Green Belt. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP — Warrington Borough Council — Costs Decision With the adoption of the LP, the site was removed from the Green Belt. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Costs Decision

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP — Warrington Borough Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/M0655/W/24/3340278 6. Although at the time the application was refused the emerging LP was at an advanced stage, the Inspector’s final recommendation was not received until after the application had been refused and the LP was not adopted until December 2023. It could not be guaranteed that the site would be removed from the Green Belt as this matter was for the full Council to formally agree. 7. Given the emerging LP was still in examination, remained to be adopted and would have still been subject to a period for legal challenge, the degree of weight to be given to the emerging LP was one for the decision maker in accordance with paragraph 48 of the National Planning Policy Framework. As such at the time of the decision it may have been reasonable to ascribe only limited weight to the emerging LP, insufficient to indicate a decision other than in accordance with the extant development plan. The Council set out its position on the weight to be given to the emerging LP and this was a matter of judgement. At appeal the Council has not defended this reason for refusal. 8. The Council’s decision stands scrutiny relative to the statutory approach to decision-taking.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Costs Decision

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP — Warrington Borough Council — Costs Decision The dispute was a matter of planning judgement, rather than the applicant being forced into an appeal by consequence of unreasonable behaviour. It therefore follows that I cannot agree that the Council behaved unreasonably in preventing or delaying a development which should clearly have been permitted, having regard to its accordance with the adopted development plan at that time. As such there can be no question that the applicant was put to unnecessary or wasted expense. Conclusion 9. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the PPG, has not been demonstrated. An award of costs is therefore not justified.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 M Ollerenshaw

North View, Stretton Road, Warrington, WA4 4NP — Warrington Borough Council — M Ollerenshaw INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶3

The applicant's contention that the Council acted unreasonably by failing to give significant weight to the emerging Warrington Local Plan was not demonstrated, as the Council's decision was in accordance with the extant development plan and the Inspector found that the Council's behaviour was reasonable.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶7-8

The Inspector found that the Council's decision to ascribe limited weight to the emerging LP was reasonable, and that the dispute was a matter of planning judgement rather than unreasonable behaviour.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
National Planning Policy Framework 48
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 9 August 2024 under the Open Government Licence.