Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP
Herefordshire Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 12 August 2024
- Authority
- Herefordshire Council
- Inspector
- Plenty B
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Other
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Allison White
- LPA reference
- 230681
- ONS LPA code
- E06000019
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 9 April 2024
Summary AI
The appeal to remove a condition related to Permitted Development rights from a planning permission was dismissed. The condition was deemed necessary to protect the character and amenity of the locality and comply with policy RA5 and SD1 of the Herefordshire Local Plan– Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
PDF text
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — by Ben Plenty BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12 August 2024
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire HR4 7HP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a grant of planning permission subject to conditions. • The appeal is made by Allison White against the decision of Herefordshire Council. • The application Ref 230681 was approved on 8 November 2023 and planning permission was granted subject to conditions. • The development permitted is “Proposed removal of condition 2 of planning permission 82/575 (Conversion of first floor of outbuilding to a first floor flat) - to regularise the current arrangements. The barn has been let as a full-time home since 2002 and in separate ownership”. • The condition in dispute is No 2 which states that: Notwithstanding the provisions of article 3(1) and Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015,(or any order revoking or re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no development which would otherwise be permitted under Classes A, AA, B, C, D, E and H of Part 1 and of Schedule 2, shall be carried out.
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire HR4 7HP • The reason given for the condition is: In order to protect the character and amenity of the locality and to ensure the character of the original conversion scheme is maintained and to comply with Policy RA5 and SD1 of the Herefordshire Local Plan– Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — character and significance of any redundant or disused buildings, to make https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — character and significance of any redundant or disused buildings, to make https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/W1850/W/23/3333453 provision for protected species, to be compatible with neighbouring uses, to be of permanent and substantial construction and to be capable of being converted without the need for substantial alteration or extension. A footnote of the policy explains that any approved conversions will be subject to the removal of PD Rights. 5. Also, CS Policy SD1, concerning sustainable design and energy efficiency, seeks to ensure that distinctive features of existing buildings and their settings are safeguarded. 6. The Council’s reason for the imposition of the condition is to ensure the proposal would comply with the above policies, to protect the character and amenity of the locality and to ensure the character of the original building is maintained. The barn is an attractive rural building with a timber frame, and consisting of traditional materials, creating both interest and charm. The barn has a traditional, simple form that complements its rural setting. The Appellant asserts that the barn was re-erected on site in 1980, but this does not materially erode the appearance of the barn or the correct application of the Council’s policies.
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — character and significance of any redundant or disused buildings, to make The addition of poorly considered PD extensions and alterations could fundamentally alter the appearance of this traditional building. This would lead to harm to the character of both the barn and the surrounding area. 7. Although the barn may have been in separate residential use since around 2002, it has not been lawfully in use as such until the condition was agreed to be removed by the Council in 2023. Consequently, the imposition of the condition, when the barn became capable of being used as an open market dwelling, was reasonable in satisfaction of CS policies RA5 and SD1. 8. The Appellant suggests that as the barn has been used as a separate dwelling since 2002, the use became immune from enforcement action in 2006. Whether the barn is immune from enforcement action and/or would satisfy a Certificate of Lawfulness has not been adequately demonstrate in this case. In any event, my consideration of the merits of the imposition of the condition, in consideration of a S73 application, is primarily concerned with the relevant policy position. This is because planning decisions must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 9.
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — character and significance of any redundant or disused buildings, to make For the Council to not remove PD rights, even if applied retrospectively, would give developers an avenue to bypass important policy requirements. Accordingly, the condition to remove PD rights in this case was reasonable and necessary. 10. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Cork and Bottle Barn, Mansel Lacy, Herefordshire, HR4 7HP — Herefordshire Council — Ben Plenty INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Living conditions Against appellant ¶4-5
The development would comply with policy RA5 of the Core Strategy, relating to the re-use of rural buildings, as it respects the character and significance of the redundant or disused building, makes provision for protected species, is compatible with neighbouring uses, is of permanent and substantial construction, and can be converted without substantial alteration or extension.
Living conditions Against appellant ¶4-5
The development would also comply with policy SD1, concerning sustainable design and energy efficiency, as it seeks to ensure that distinctive features of existing buildings and their settings are safeguarded.
Living conditions Against appellant ¶7
The barn has been used as a separate dwelling since 2002, but the imposition of the condition, when the barn became capable of being used as an open market dwelling, was reasonable in satisfaction of CS policies RA5 and SD1.
Living conditions Against appellant ¶9
For the Council to not remove PD rights, even if applied retrospectively, would give developers an avenue to bypass important policy requirements, making the condition to remove PD rights necessary.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| RA5 and SD1 of the Herefordshire Local Plan– Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework |
Substantial |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 12 August 2024 under the Open Government Licence.