Case 3332359

Land adjacent to 1 Ball Knapp, Dunkeswell, Devon, EX14 4QQ

East Devon District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
28 August 2024
Authority
East Devon District Council
Inspector
Kent R
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Anthony Watts
LPA reference
23/1111/OUT
ONS LPA code
E07000040
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
16 January 2024

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs against East Devon District Council was refused because the Council's behaviour in the appeal process was not considered unreasonable. The Inspector found that the Council was concerned with the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, which was an appropriate matter to consider.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land adjacent to 1 Ball Knapp, Dunkeswell, Devon, EX14 4QQ — East Devon District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 4 June 2024 by R Kent BA (Hons) MTP DipM MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 28th August 2024 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/U1105/W/23/3332359 Land adjacent to 1 Ball Knapp, Dunkeswell, Honiton, Devon EX14 4QQ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Anthony Watts for a full award of costs against East Devon District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of the Council to grant planning permission for an Outline Application with all matters reserved for the erection of one dwelling. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land adjacent to 1 Ball Knapp, Dunkeswell, Devon, EX14 4QQ — East Devon District Council — Costs Decision In setting out the background to the reason for refusal, the planning officer’s report made clear that it was an outline application with all matters reserved. It explained that it was necessary to consider whether the plot could accommodate a dwelling in a manner which would not detract from its surroundings. The report accepted that the plans were illustrative but also referred to them in assessing whether the plot could accommodate a development which would avoid appearing unduly cramped. Whilst the Council clearly did use the illustrative material to inform its judgement, I am satisfied that it did not base its decision on them. It further substantiated this in its letter of 20th February 2024 providing additional observations in response to the appellant’s Statement of Case. 4. I am therefore satisfied from the evidence that the Council was concerned with the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area rather than the detailed design or appearance of the proposed dwelling. This was an appropriate matter to consider as part of establishing the principle of development on the site. 5.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land adjacent to 1 Ball Knapp, Dunkeswell, Devon, EX14 4QQ — East Devon District Council — Costs Decision Therefore, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not occurred and an award of costs is not warranted.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 R Kent

Land adjacent to 1 Ball Knapp, Dunkeswell, Devon, EX14 4QQ — East Devon District Council — R Kent INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶4

The Inspector found that the Council's decision to refuse planning permission was based on the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, rather than the detailed design or appearance of the proposed dwelling.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Planning Practice Guidance (PPG)
Unclear

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 28 August 2024 under the Open Government Licence.