Case 3332012

2a Vigor Road, Bristol, BS13 9QH

Bristol City Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
19 March 2024
Authority
Bristol City Council
Inspector
Bore J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
J Cook
LPA reference
22/04759/F
ONS LPA code
E06000023
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
17 January 2024

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to concerns about the impact of the development on the character of the area and the living conditions of existing and prospective occupiers. The inspector found that the development would be too cramped and would conflict with local development plan policies.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

2a Vigor Road, Bristol, BS13 9QH — Bristol City Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 5 March 2024 by Jonathan Bore MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 19 March 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/Z0116/W/23/3332012 2a Vigor Road, Hartcliffe, Bristol BS13 9QH • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by J Cook against the decision of Bristol City Council. • The application ref is 22/04759/F. • The development proposed is the conversion of a double garage into a 1 bed dwelling. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issues 2. The main issues are, firstly, the effect of the development on the character of the area; secondly, the effect on the living conditions of existing and prospective occupiers; and thirdly, the contribution of the scheme to housing supply and housing choice. Reasons The effect of the development on the character of the area 3. 2a Vigor Road and the garage to the rear were built under planning permission 7/02651/F. In the appeal scheme, the newly built garage would be converted to a small 2 storey dwelling, and part of the garden to the rear of 2 Vigor Road would be separated off to create a garden area for the converted garage.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

2a Vigor Road, Bristol, BS13 9QH — Bristol City Council — Appeal Decision 4. Policy BCS20 of the adopted Bristol Core Strategy encourages efficiency in the use of land and allows for higher densities in certain circumstances, taking account of the characteristics of the site and its context and the need to achieve high quality, well-designed environments. 5. However, the scheme would not achieve a high quality, well-designed environment. The dwelling would be very close to the rear of 2 and 2a Vigor Road and it would be necessary to carve out part of the garden area to provide outside space for the new occupants. Whilst the erection of the garage has already caused the loss of some of the rear garden area, the scheme would leave both 2 Vigor Road and the new residential unit with extremely small gardens. 6. This area is characterised by a relatively spacious development pattern of two storey houses fronting estate roads, with reasonable-sized rear gardens. The residential use of what was originally designed to be a rear garage, and the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

2a Vigor Road, Bristol, BS13 9QH — Bristol City Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Z0116/W/23/3332012 very small gardens that would be a consequence of the development, would appear incongruous here. 7. The scheme would be a cramped form of residential development out of keeping with the character of the area, and would conflict with Policies BCS20 and BCS21 of the Core Strategy and Policy DM26 of the adopted Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Document, which together seek to ensure that development is sympathetic to local character, provides high quality living environments and retains local distinctiveness. The effect on the living conditions of existing and prospective occupiers 8. The upper floor of the proposed dwelling would be lit by rooflights, and substantial garden walls have been erected in an attempt to create privacy. Nevertheless, the proposed dwelling would simply be too close to its neighbours to allow for an adequate level of privacy or satisfactory external space for existing and prospective residents. The upper floor windows in Vigor Road would look at close range towards the rear of the proposed dwelling and its garden.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

2a Vigor Road, Bristol, BS13 9QH — Bristol City Council — Appeal Decision The small rear garden of the proposed dwelling would be dominated by its boundary walls and by the adjacent buildings and would provide poor quality amenity space. 9. The scheme would create unsatisfactory living conditions for both existing and prospective occupiers and would conflict with Policy BCS21 of the Core Strategy and Policies DM27 and DM30 of the Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Document which require development to safeguard the amenity of existing occupiers, maintain adequate levels of privacy and provide adequate, appropriate and useable amenity space. The contribution of the scheme to housing supply and housing choice 10. Core Strategy Policies BCS1 and BCS5 seek to promote new development and regeneration and encourage development in built up areas. There is a need for new homes in the area, which has less than 5 years housing land supply, and the proposed dwelling would provide a different form of accommodation from those prevalent in the area, and would potentially meet the needs of a different kind of household. 11. However, the scheme would make only a very minor contribution towards housing land supply and housing choice.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

2a Vigor Road, Bristol, BS13 9QH — Bristol City Council — Appeal Decision Although there is a housing land supply shortfall, that does not diminish the importance of those development plan policies designed to protect local character and ensure good living conditions. The benefits of providing the additional dwelling would be significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm that would arise from the scheme. Conclusion 12. I have taken into account all the other matters raised but they do not alter the balance of my conclusions. For the reasons given above, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Jonathan Bore

2a Vigor Road, Bristol, BS13 9QH — Bristol City Council — Jonathan Bore INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The residential use of what was originally designed to be a rear garage, and the very small gardens that would be a consequence of the development, would appear incongruous here.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The scheme would be a cramped form of residential development out of keeping with the character of the area.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶8

The proposed dwelling would simply be too close to its neighbours to allow for an adequate level of privacy or satisfactory external space for existing and prospective residents.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶9

The scheme would create unsatisfactory living conditions for both existing and prospective occupiers.

Housing land supply
For appellant
¶10

There is a need for new homes in the area, which has less than 5 years housing land supply, and the proposed dwelling would provide a different form of accommodation from those prevalent in the area.

Housing land supply
Against appellant
¶11

The scheme would make only a very minor contribution towards housing land supply and housing choice.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
BCS20
Limited
BCS21
Determinative
BCS1
Moderate
BCS5
Moderate
DM26
Determinative
DM27
Determinative
DM30
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 19 March 2024 under the Open Government Licence.